Laboratory Proficiency Testing Comprehensive Study by Type (Pharmaceuticals, Biologics, Clinical Diagnostics, Microbiology, Cosmetics, Cannabis/Opioids, Food and Animal Feed, Commercial Beverages, Water, Environmental, Dietary Supplements, Nutraceuticals), Technology (Spectrophotometry, Chromatography, ELISA, PCR, Cell Culture, Others), End Use (Hospitals, Contract Research Organizations, Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies, Academic Research, Diagnostic Laboratories) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2027

Laboratory Proficiency Testing Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027 | CAGR: 6.72%  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
Laboratory Proficiency Testing is used to show evidence of their performance and to ensure that their analytical results can be trusted. Several companies such as Bio-Rad constantly introduce innovations in the testing programs. These programs are efficient and help the laboratories to maintain their quality according to standards set by international associations. Increasing demand for packaged food products and increasing focus on water testing as it contains a wide range of inorganic and organic analytes including routine and toxic metals are the major driving factors for the global laboratory proficiency testing market. The growing biosimilars market has projected the growth of the global laboratory proficiency testing market in the forecast period. According to AMA Research, the market for Laboratory Proficiency Testing is expected to register a CAGR of 6.72% during the forecast period to 2027. This growth is primarily driven by Stringent safety and Quality Regulations for Food and Pharmaceutical Products .

AttributesDetails
Study Period2017-2027
Base Year2021
Forecast Period2022-2027
Volume UnitN
Value UnitUSD (Million)
Key Companies in StudyLGC Limited (United Kingdom), Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States), Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom), Merck (Germany), College of American Pathologists (United States), American Proficiency Institute (United States), Waters Corporation (United States), QACS (Greece), FAPAS (United Kingdom), AOAC (United States), Phenova Inc. (United States), Weqas (United Kingdom) and Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom)
Customization ScopeAvail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility


The Life Sciences Tools & Services sector in the region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Players, such as LGC Limited (United Kingdom), Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States), Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom), Merck (Germany), College of American Pathologists (United States), American Proficiency Institute (United States), Waters Corporation (United States), QACS (Greece), FAPAS (United Kingdom), AOAC (United States), Phenova Inc. (United States), Weqas (United Kingdom) and Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom), etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Key Developments in the Market:
In 2022, Fera Science Ltd. - Fapas (UK) has partnered with BioFront Technologies to serve as Fapas' proficiency testing service agent in the US., In 2021, Waters Corporation (USA) has partnered with Sartorius AG (Germany) with the goal of giving bioprocess experts direct access to high-quality mass spectrometer (MS) data to speed up and improve the accuracy of biopharmaceutical process development., In 2021, Waters Corporation (USA) has partnered with the University of Delaware (USA) to develop novel analytical solutions for bioprocessing and biomanufacturing., Recently, LGC has expanded its immunosuppressant-certified reference materials portfolio with the launch of Human blood-sirolimus (ERM-DA111a). and In March 2018, Fera Science has launched the world’s most thorough wine proficiency testing scheme in partnership with Isvea srl (Italy) and Fera’s agent in Italy—StarEcotronics.
In 2021, LGC Limited has announced the development of a new business group to provide intelligent assurance across supply chain assurance solutions covering critical touchpoints with a focus on manufacturing, laboratory, ingredient and nutritional supplement sectors. and In February 2018, Randox and Qnostics have entered into a strategic partnership under which Randox will have access to the Qnostics molecular range of products for sales and distribution, while Qnostics will have access to Randox’s commercial capabilities to increase the market penetration of Molecular Quality Controls and custom services.

Laboratory Proficiency Testing Market Dynamics:
AttributesDetails
Growth Drivers
  • Stringent safety and Quality Regulations for Food and Pharmaceutical Products
  • Proficiency Testing as an Essential Precondition for Operational Excellence
Influencing Trends
  • Rising Inclination and Focus on Water Testing
Restraints
  • High Capital Investments for Accurate and Sensitive Testing
Road Blocks / Challenges
  • Logistical and Data Interpretation Challenges
  • Dearth of Skilled Professionals
Gaps & Opportunities
  • Technological Advancements and Development in the Testing Industry
  • Growing Opportunities in Emerging Economies


AMA Research follows a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mainly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcases the spontaneously changing Players landscape impacting the market's growth. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyze the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Data Sources of Laboratory Proficiency Testing Market Study

Primary Collection: InMail, LinkedIn Groups, Survey Monkey, Google, and Other professional Forums are some of the medium utilized to gather primary data through key industry participants and appointees, subject-matter experts, C-level executives of Laboratory Proficiency Testing Industry, among others including independent industry consultants, experts, to obtain and verify critical qualitative commentary and opinion and quantitative statistics, to assess future market prospects.

The primary interviews and data collected as per the below protocols:
• By Designation: C-Level, D-Level, Others
• By Company Type: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3

Secondary Data Sources such as Annual reports, Press releases, Analyst meetings, Conference calls, Investor presentations, Management statements, SEC filings of Laboratory Proficiency Testing players along with Regulatory Sites, Association, World bank, etc were used as sources secondary set of data.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts but also includes significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Laboratory Proficiency Testing Study Sheds Light on
— The Laboratory Proficiency Testing Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analysts at AMA organize and took surveys of the Laboratory Proficiency Testing industry Players. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Laboratory Proficiency Testing industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey, and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Players can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold the value they currently claim or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Biologics
  • Clinical Diagnostics
  • Microbiology
  • Cosmetics
  • Cannabis/Opioids
  • Food and Animal Feed
  • Commercial Beverages
  • Water
  • Environmental
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Nutraceuticals
By Technology
  • Spectrophotometry
  • Chromatography
  • ELISA
  • PCR
  • Cell Culture
  • Others

By End Use
  • Hospitals
  • Contract Research Organizations
  • Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
  • Academic Research
  • Diagnostic Laboratories

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Stringent safety and Quality Regulations for Food and Pharmaceutical Products
      • 3.2.2. Proficiency Testing as an Essential Precondition for Operational Excellence
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Logistical and Data Interpretation Challenges
      • 3.3.2. Dearth of Skilled Professionals
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Rising Inclination and Focus on Water Testing
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type, Technology, End Use and Region (value) (2016-2021)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Pharmaceuticals
        • 5.2.1.2. Biologics
        • 5.2.1.3. Clinical Diagnostics
        • 5.2.1.4. Microbiology
        • 5.2.1.5. Cosmetics
        • 5.2.1.6. Cannabis/Opioids
        • 5.2.1.7. Food and Animal Feed
        • 5.2.1.8. Commercial Beverages
        • 5.2.1.9. Water
        • 5.2.1.10. Environmental
        • 5.2.1.11. Dietary Supplements
        • 5.2.1.12. Nutraceuticals
      • 5.2.2. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: Technology (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Spectrophotometry
        • 5.2.2.2. Chromatography
        • 5.2.2.3. ELISA
        • 5.2.2.4. PCR
        • 5.2.2.5. Cell Culture
        • 5.2.2.6. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: End Use (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Hospitals
        • 5.2.3.2. Contract Research Organizations
        • 5.2.3.3. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
        • 5.2.3.4. Academic Research
        • 5.2.3.5. Diagnostic Laboratories
      • 5.2.4. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2021)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. LGC Limited (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Merck (Germany)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. College of American Pathologists (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. American Proficiency Institute (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Waters Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. QACS (Greece)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. FAPAS (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. AOAC (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. Phenova Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Weqas (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing Sale, by Type, Technology, End Use and Region (value) (2022-2027)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Pharmaceuticals
        • 7.2.1.2. Biologics
        • 7.2.1.3. Clinical Diagnostics
        • 7.2.1.4. Microbiology
        • 7.2.1.5. Cosmetics
        • 7.2.1.6. Cannabis/Opioids
        • 7.2.1.7. Food and Animal Feed
        • 7.2.1.8. Commercial Beverages
        • 7.2.1.9. Water
        • 7.2.1.10. Environmental
        • 7.2.1.11. Dietary Supplements
        • 7.2.1.12. Nutraceuticals
      • 7.2.2. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: Technology (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Spectrophotometry
        • 7.2.2.2. Chromatography
        • 7.2.2.3. ELISA
        • 7.2.2.4. PCR
        • 7.2.2.5. Cell Culture
        • 7.2.2.6. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing by: End Use (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Hospitals
        • 7.2.3.2. Contract Research Organizations
        • 7.2.3.3. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
        • 7.2.3.4. Academic Research
        • 7.2.3.5. Diagnostic Laboratories
      • 7.2.4. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Pharmaceuticals , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 3. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Biologics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 4. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Clinical Diagnostics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 5. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Microbiology , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 6. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cosmetics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 7. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cannabis/Opioids , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 8. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Food and Animal Feed , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 9. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Commercial Beverages , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 10. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Water , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 11. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Environmental , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 12. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Dietary Supplements , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 13. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Nutraceuticals , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 14. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Technology(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Spectrophotometry , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 16. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Chromatography , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 17. Laboratory Proficiency Testing ELISA , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 18. Laboratory Proficiency Testing PCR , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 19. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cell Culture , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 20. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Others , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 21. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by End Use(USD Million)
  • Table 22. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 23. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Contract Research Organizations , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 24. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 25. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Academic Research , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 26. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Diagnostic Laboratories , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 27. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 28. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 29. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 30. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 31. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 32. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 33. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 34. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 35. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 36. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 38. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 39. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 43. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 44. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 45. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 46. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 47. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 48. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 49. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 50. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 51. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 52. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 53. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 54. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 55. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 56. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 57. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 58. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 59. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 60. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 61. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 62. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 63. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 64. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 65. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 66. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 67. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 68. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 69. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 70. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 71. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 72. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 73. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 74. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 75. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 76. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 77. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 78. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 79. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 80. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 81. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 82. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 83. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 84. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 85. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 86. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 87. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 88. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 89. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 90. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 91. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 92. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 93. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 94. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 95. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 96. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 97. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 98. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 99. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 100. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 101. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 102. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 103. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 104. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 105. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 106. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 107. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 108. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 109. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 110. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 111. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 112. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 113. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 114. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 115. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 116. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 117. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 118. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 119. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 120. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 121. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 122. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 123. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 124. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Pharmaceuticals , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 125. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Biologics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 126. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Clinical Diagnostics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 127. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Microbiology , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 128. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cosmetics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 129. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cannabis/Opioids , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 130. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Food and Animal Feed , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 131. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Commercial Beverages , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 132. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Water , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 133. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Environmental , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 134. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Dietary Supplements , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 135. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Nutraceuticals , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 136. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Technology(USD Million)
  • Table 137. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Spectrophotometry , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 138. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Chromatography , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 139. Laboratory Proficiency Testing ELISA , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 140. Laboratory Proficiency Testing PCR , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 141. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Cell Culture , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 142. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Others , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 143. Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by End Use(USD Million)
  • Table 144. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 145. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Contract Research Organizations , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 146. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 147. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Academic Research , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 148. Laboratory Proficiency Testing Diagnostic Laboratories , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 149. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 150. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 151. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 152. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 153. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 154. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 155. Brazil Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 156. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 157. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 158. Argentina Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 159. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 160. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 161. Rest of South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 162. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 163. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 164. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 165. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 166. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 167. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 168. China Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 169. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 170. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 171. Japan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 172. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 173. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 174. India Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 175. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 176. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 177. South Korea Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 178. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 179. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 180. Taiwan Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 181. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 182. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 183. Australia Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 184. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 185. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 186. Rest of Asia-Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 187. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 188. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 189. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 190. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 191. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 192. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 193. Germany Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 194. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 195. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 196. France Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 197. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 198. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 199. Italy Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 200. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 201. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 202. United Kingdom Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 203. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 204. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 205. Netherlands Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 206. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 207. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 208. Rest of Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 209. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 210. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 211. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 212. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 213. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 214. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 215. Middle East Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 216. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 217. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 218. Africa Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 219. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 220. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 221. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 222. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 223. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 224. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 225. United States Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 226. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 227. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 228. Canada Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 229. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 230. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 231. Mexico Laboratory Proficiency Testing, by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 232. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 233. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 234. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 5. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Technology USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 6. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by End Use USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 7. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing share by Players 2021 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing share by Players (Top 3) 2021(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing share by Players (Top 5) 2021(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. LGC Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. LGC Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 18. Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 20. Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 22. Merck (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Merck (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 24. College of American Pathologists (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. College of American Pathologists (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 26. American Proficiency Institute (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. American Proficiency Institute (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 28. Waters Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Waters Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 30. QACS (Greece) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. QACS (Greece) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 32. FAPAS (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. FAPAS (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 34. AOAC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. AOAC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 36. Phenova Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Phenova Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 38. Weqas (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. Weqas (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 40. Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 42. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 43. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by Technology USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 44. Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing: by End Use USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 45. South America Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. Asia Pacific Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. Europe Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 48. MEA Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. North America Laboratory Proficiency Testing Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • LGC Limited (United Kingdom)
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States)
  • Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom)
  • Merck (Germany)
  • College of American Pathologists (United States)
  • American Proficiency Institute (United States)
  • Waters Corporation (United States)
  • QACS (Greece)
  • FAPAS (United Kingdom)
  • AOAC (United States)
  • Phenova Inc. (United States)
  • Weqas (United Kingdom)
  • Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Bipea (France) , Absolute Standards Inc. (United States) , NSI Lab Solutions (united States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Aug 2022 159 Pages 71 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2017-2021; Base year: 2021; Forecast period: 2022 to 2027
Companies that are profiled in Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing Market are LGC Limited (United Kingdom), Bio-Rad Laboratories (United States), Randox Laboratories (United Kingdom), Merck (Germany), College of American Pathologists (United States), American Proficiency Institute (United States), Waters Corporation (United States), QACS (Greece), FAPAS (United Kingdom), AOAC (United States), Phenova Inc. (United States), Weqas (United Kingdom) and Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC (United Kingdom) etc.
AMA Research predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing market throughout the forecasted period.

Know More About Global Laboratory Proficiency Testing Report?