Global Plant Phenotyping Market
Global Plant Phenotyping Market

Plant Phenotyping Comprehensive Study by Type (Equipment, Software (Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others), Sensors (Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others)), Application (High-throughput Screening, Trait Identification, Photosynthetic Performance, Morphology and Growth Assessment, Others), Site (Laboratory, Greenhouse, Field), Analysis Systems (Image Analysis Systems, Multispectral Scientific Cameras, Canopy Analysis Systems, Fluorometers, Others), Platform (Conveyor-based/modular systems, Bench-based systems, Handheld/Portable systems, Drones), Level of Automation (Fully automated, Semi-automated, Manual) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2024

Plant Phenotyping Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2019- 2024  

May 2019 Edition 222 Pages 223 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Global Plant Phenotyping Market Overview:
According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FOO), it is anticipated that there is a need to double the production of cereals before 2050 to meet rising demand for food and to curb growing competition for crops as sources of industrial, fiber, and bio-energy purposes. Plant Phenotyping is a quantitative elucidation of a plantís physiological, biochemical, ontogenetical, and anatomical properties. It assists in a complete assessment of complex plant traits. Phenotypic data assists in detecting Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) and in understanding gene functions. Moreover, it also provides insights into how pathogens and pests influence phenotypes, how they respond to CO2 or light, and how plants cope with limitations of nutrients and water. Further, rising demand for increasing the production of food grains and other crops and factual experiments to increase their production is driving the Global plant phenotyping market. Some of the key players profiled in the study are LemnaTec (Germany), CropDesign - BASF SE (Germany), Heinz Walz (Germany), Photon Systems Instruments (Czech Republic), Qubit Systems (Canada), KeyGene (Netherlands), Delta-T Devices (UK), Phenospex (Netherlands), WPS (Netherlands), Rothamsted Research (UK), The Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (Austria) and Phenomix (France).

On the basis of geography, the market of Plant Phenotyping has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Site, the sub-segment i.e. Laboratory will boost the Plant Phenotyping market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Analysis Systems, the sub-segment i.e. Image Analysis Systems will boost the Plant Phenotyping market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Platform, the sub-segment i.e. Conveyor-based/modular systems will boost the Plant Phenotyping market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Level of Automation , the sub-segment i.e. Fully automated will boost the Plant Phenotyping market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Rising Needs to Grow High Yielding Crops to Meet Global Food Security Needs
  • Improving Crop Varieties That Yield Higher Than Traditional Crops Resulting in Plant Phenotyping
  • Increasing Prevalence of Seed-Borne Diseases

Market Trend
  • Advancement in Imaging Sensor for High Throughput Data
  • Rise in demand for quantitative analysis of plant traits Adapted Soil and Environmental conditions

Restraints
  • Lack of Technical, Conceptual Awareness & Skilled Professionals
  • Limited Players Available for Products & Services for Plant Phenotyping Market

Opportunities
  • Remote Sensing Tools Used for Plant Phenotyping Market

Challenges
  • Lower Adoption in Emerging Economies Due To Limited Funding
  • Unpredictable Change in Climatic Conditions


Major Market Developments:

In May 2019, A LiDAR (Velodyne HDL64-S3) on a mobile robot was launched, making the robot a phenomobile used for maize plant which is a high throughput phenotyping technique. Software for data collection and analysis under the Robotic Operating System using open source components and algorithm libraries was developed
In August 2018, Springer link Journal discovered, Phenomics or automated phenotyping (AP) is an emerging approach was identified as a priority for future crop breeding research. This approach promises to provide accurate, precise, fast, large-scale, and accumulated phenotyping data which when integrated with corresponding genomic and environmental data is expected to trigger a great leap forward in plant breeding.

The global plant phenotyping market is moderately fragmented. The players are leveraging advanced technologies to offer high-quality products to meet the evolving needs of the end-user industries.

Target Audience:
Plant Phenotyping Equipment and Conveyor System Manufacturers, Plant Phenotyping Service Providers, Technology Providers, Lab Analytical Instrument Manufacturers, Plant Phenotyping Research Associations and Industry Bodies, Public and Commercial Research Institutions/Agencies/Laboratories, Government Regulatory Authorities, Plant Breeders and Seed Companies, Biotechnology Companies and Crop Farmer Associations and Cooperative Societies

Major Objectives Focused through this Study
• To define, describe, and forecast the Global Plant Phenotyping market on the basis of product [Equipment, Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others] and Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others]] , application [High-throughput Screening, Trait Identification, Photosynthetic Performance, Morphology and Growth Assessment and Others], key regions and end user
• To provide in-depth information regarding major influencing factors affecting the growth of the market (trends, drivers, restraints, opportunities, and industry-centric and regional challenges)
• To strategically analyse the micro-markets and important business segments with respect to individual growth drivers , market trends and potential, and historical contributions to the total market
• Identifying the opportunities in the market for key stakeholders and detailing the competitive landscape for market leaders
• To provide market size for various segments of the Plant Phenotyping market with respect to major geographies, namely, South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico)
• To strategically profile the key players and analyzing their market shares and core competencies in the Plant Phenotyping industry
• To track key developments such as product launches, expansions, agreements, partnerships, mergers & acquisitions, and R&D activities that are key factors in shaping the market

Available Customization:
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**. Additionally, the Vendors which are also part of the research are .
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase

While framing the research framework, major and emerging players operating in the Plant Phenotyping market in various regions have been profiled, and their offerings, geographic footprints, and distribution/sales channels have been analysed through in-depth discussions. Top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to determine the overall market size. Sizes of the other individual markets have been estimated using the percentage splits obtained through secondary sources such as Hoovers, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, and Dow Jones (Factiva), along with primary respondents. The complete methodology includes the study of the annual and financial reports of the key market players and extensive interviews with industry experts such as CEOs, VPs, directors, and marketing executives for key insights (both qualitative and quantitative) related to the market.
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Equipment
  • Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others]
  • Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others]
By Application
  • High-throughput Screening
  • Trait Identification
  • Photosynthetic Performance
  • Morphology and Growth Assessment
  • Others
By Site
  • Laboratory
  • Greenhouse
  • Field

By Analysis Systems
  • Image Analysis Systems
  • Multispectral Scientific Cameras
  • Canopy Analysis Systems
  • Fluorometers
  • Others

By Platform
  • Conveyor-based/modular systems
  • Bench-based systems
  • Handheld/Portable systems
  • Drones

By Level of Automation
  • Fully automated
  • Semi-automated
  • Manual

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Rising Needs to Grow High Yielding Crops to Meet Global Food Security Needs
      • 3.2.2. Improving Crop Varieties That Yield Higher Than Traditional Crops Resulting in Plant Phenotyping
      • 3.2.3. Increasing Prevalence of Seed-Borne Diseases
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lower Adoption in Emerging Economies Due To Limited Funding
      • 3.3.2. Unpredictable Change in Climatic Conditions
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Advancement in Imaging Sensor for High Throughput Data
      • 3.4.2. Rise in demand for quantitative analysis of plant traits Adapted Soil and Environmental conditions
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Plant Phenotyping, by Type, Application, Site, Analysis Systems, Platform, Level of Automation and Region (value) (2013-2018)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Plant Phenotyping (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Equipment
        • 5.2.1.2. Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others]
        • 5.2.1.3. Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others]
      • 5.2.2. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. High-throughput Screening
        • 5.2.2.2. Trait Identification
        • 5.2.2.3. Photosynthetic Performance
        • 5.2.2.4. Morphology and Growth Assessment
        • 5.2.2.5. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Site (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Laboratory
        • 5.2.3.2. Greenhouse
        • 5.2.3.3. Field
      • 5.2.4. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Analysis Systems (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Image Analysis Systems
        • 5.2.4.2. Multispectral Scientific Cameras
        • 5.2.4.3. Canopy Analysis Systems
        • 5.2.4.4. Fluorometers
        • 5.2.4.5. Others
      • 5.2.5. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Platform (Value)
        • 5.2.5.1. Conveyor-based/modular systems
        • 5.2.5.2. Bench-based systems
        • 5.2.5.3. Handheld/Portable systems
        • 5.2.5.4. Drones
      • 5.2.6. Global Plant Phenotyping Region
        • 5.2.6.1. South America
          • 5.2.6.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.6.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.6.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.6.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.6.2.1. China
          • 5.2.6.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.6.2.3. India
          • 5.2.6.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.6.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.6.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.6.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.6.3. Europe
          • 5.2.6.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.6.3.2. France
          • 5.2.6.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.6.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.6.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.6.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.6.4. MEA
          • 5.2.6.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.6.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.6.5. North America
          • 5.2.6.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.6.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.6.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Plant Phenotyping: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2018)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. LemnaTec (Germany)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. CropDesign - BASF SE (Germany)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Heinz Walz (Germany)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Photon Systems Instruments (Czech Republic)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Qubit Systems (Canada)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. KeyGene (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Delta-T Devices (UK)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Phenospex (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. WPS (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Rothamsted Research (UK)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. The Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (Austria)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Phenomix (France)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Plant Phenotyping Sale, by Type, Application, Site, Analysis Systems, Platform, Level of Automation and Region (value) (2019-2024)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Plant Phenotyping (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Equipment
        • 7.2.1.2. Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others]
        • 7.2.1.3. Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others]
      • 7.2.2. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. High-throughput Screening
        • 7.2.2.2. Trait Identification
        • 7.2.2.3. Photosynthetic Performance
        • 7.2.2.4. Morphology and Growth Assessment
        • 7.2.2.5. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Site (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Laboratory
        • 7.2.3.2. Greenhouse
        • 7.2.3.3. Field
      • 7.2.4. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Analysis Systems (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Image Analysis Systems
        • 7.2.4.2. Multispectral Scientific Cameras
        • 7.2.4.3. Canopy Analysis Systems
        • 7.2.4.4. Fluorometers
        • 7.2.4.5. Others
      • 7.2.5. Global Plant Phenotyping by: Platform (Value)
        • 7.2.5.1. Conveyor-based/modular systems
        • 7.2.5.2. Bench-based systems
        • 7.2.5.3. Handheld/Portable systems
        • 7.2.5.4. Drones
      • 7.2.6. Global Plant Phenotyping Region
        • 7.2.6.1. South America
          • 7.2.6.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.6.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.6.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.6.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.6.2.1. China
          • 7.2.6.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.6.2.3. India
          • 7.2.6.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.6.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.6.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.6.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.6.3. Europe
          • 7.2.6.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.6.3.2. France
          • 7.2.6.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.6.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.6.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.6.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.6.4. MEA
          • 7.2.6.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.6.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.6.5. North America
          • 7.2.6.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.6.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.6.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Plant Phenotyping: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Plant Phenotyping Equipment , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 3. Plant Phenotyping Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others] , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 4. Plant Phenotyping Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others] , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 5. Plant Phenotyping: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Plant Phenotyping High-throughput Screening , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 7. Plant Phenotyping Trait Identification , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 8. Plant Phenotyping Photosynthetic Performance , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 9. Plant Phenotyping Morphology and Growth Assessment , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 10. Plant Phenotyping Others , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 11. Plant Phenotyping: by Site(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Plant Phenotyping Laboratory , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 13. Plant Phenotyping Greenhouse , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 14. Plant Phenotyping Field , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 15. Plant Phenotyping: by Analysis Systems(USD Million)
  • Table 16. Plant Phenotyping Image Analysis Systems , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 17. Plant Phenotyping Multispectral Scientific Cameras , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 18. Plant Phenotyping Canopy Analysis Systems , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 19. Plant Phenotyping Fluorometers , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 20. Plant Phenotyping Others , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 21. Plant Phenotyping: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 22. Plant Phenotyping Conveyor-based/modular systems , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 23. Plant Phenotyping Bench-based systems , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 24. Plant Phenotyping Handheld/Portable systems , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 25. Plant Phenotyping Drones , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 26. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 27. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 28. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 29. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 30. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 31. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 32. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 33. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 34. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 35. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 36. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 37. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 38. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 39. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 40. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 41. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 42. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 43. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 44. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 45. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 46. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 47. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 48. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 49. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 50. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 51. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 52. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 53. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 54. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 55. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 56. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 57. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 58. China Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 59. China Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 60. China Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 61. China Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 62. China Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 63. China Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 64. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 65. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 66. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 67. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 68. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 69. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 70. India Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 71. India Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 72. India Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 73. India Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 74. India Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 75. India Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 76. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 77. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 78. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 79. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 80. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 81. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 82. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 83. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 84. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 85. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 86. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 87. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 88. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 89. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 90. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 91. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 92. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 93. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 94. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 95. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 96. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 97. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 98. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 99. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 100. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 101. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 102. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 103. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 104. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 105. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 106. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 107. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 108. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 109. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 110. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 111. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 112. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 113. France Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 114. France Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 115. France Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 116. France Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 117. France Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 118. France Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 119. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 120. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 121. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 122. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 123. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 124. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 125. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 126. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 127. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 128. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 129. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 130. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 131. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 132. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 133. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 134. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 135. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 136. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 137. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 138. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 139. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 140. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 141. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 142. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 143. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 144. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 145. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 146. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 147. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 148. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 149. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 150. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 151. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 152. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 153. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 154. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 155. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 156. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 157. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 158. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 159. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 160. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 161. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 162. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 163. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 164. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 165. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 166. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 167. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 168. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 169. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 170. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 171. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 172. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 173. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 174. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 175. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 176. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 177. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 178. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 179. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 180. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 181. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 182. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 183. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 184. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 185. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 186. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 187. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 188. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 189. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 190. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 191. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 192. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 193. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 194. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 195. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 196. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 197. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 198. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 199. Plant Phenotyping: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 200. Plant Phenotyping Equipment , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 201. Plant Phenotyping Software [Data acquisition, Image analysis, System control, others] , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 202. Plant Phenotyping Sensors [Image sensors, NDVI sensors, Temperature sensors, others] , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 203. Plant Phenotyping: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 204. Plant Phenotyping High-throughput Screening , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 205. Plant Phenotyping Trait Identification , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 206. Plant Phenotyping Photosynthetic Performance , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 207. Plant Phenotyping Morphology and Growth Assessment , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 208. Plant Phenotyping Others , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 209. Plant Phenotyping: by Site(USD Million)
  • Table 210. Plant Phenotyping Laboratory , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 211. Plant Phenotyping Greenhouse , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 212. Plant Phenotyping Field , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 213. Plant Phenotyping: by Analysis Systems(USD Million)
  • Table 214. Plant Phenotyping Image Analysis Systems , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 215. Plant Phenotyping Multispectral Scientific Cameras , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 216. Plant Phenotyping Canopy Analysis Systems , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 217. Plant Phenotyping Fluorometers , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 218. Plant Phenotyping Others , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 219. Plant Phenotyping: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 220. Plant Phenotyping Conveyor-based/modular systems , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 221. Plant Phenotyping Bench-based systems , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 222. Plant Phenotyping Handheld/Portable systems , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 223. Plant Phenotyping Drones , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 224. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 225. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 226. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 227. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 228. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 229. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 230. South America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 231. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 232. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 233. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 234. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 235. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 236. Brazil Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 237. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 238. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 239. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 240. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 241. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 242. Argentina Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 243. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 244. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 245. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 246. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 247. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 248. Rest of South America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 249. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 250. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 251. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 252. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 253. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 254. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 255. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 256. China Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 257. China Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 258. China Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 259. China Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 260. China Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 261. China Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 262. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 263. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 264. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 265. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 266. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 267. Japan Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 268. India Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 269. India Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 270. India Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 271. India Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 272. India Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 273. India Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 274. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 275. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 276. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 277. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 278. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 279. South Korea Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 280. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 281. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 282. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 283. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 284. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 285. Taiwan Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 286. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 287. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 288. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 289. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 290. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 291. Australia Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 292. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 293. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 294. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 295. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 296. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 297. Rest of Asia-Pacific Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 298. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 299. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 300. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 301. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 302. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 303. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 304. Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 305. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 306. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 307. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 308. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 309. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 310. Germany Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 311. France Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 312. France Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 313. France Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 314. France Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 315. France Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 316. France Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 317. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 318. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 319. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 320. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 321. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 322. Italy Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 323. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 324. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 325. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 326. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 327. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 328. United Kingdom Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 329. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 330. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 331. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 332. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 333. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 334. Netherlands Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 335. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 336. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 337. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 338. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 339. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 340. Rest of Europe Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 341. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 342. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 343. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 344. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 345. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 346. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 347. MEA Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 348. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 349. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 350. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 351. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 352. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 353. Middle East Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 354. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 355. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 356. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 357. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 358. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 359. Africa Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 360. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 361. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 362. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 363. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 364. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 365. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 366. North America Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 367. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 368. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 369. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 370. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 371. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 372. United States Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 373. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 374. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 375. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 376. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 377. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 378. Canada Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 379. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 380. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 381. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 382. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 383. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 384. Mexico Plant Phenotyping, by Level of Automation USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 385. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 386. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 387. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 5. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 6. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Site USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 7. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Analysis Systems USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 8. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Platform USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 9. South America Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. Europe Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. MEA Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. North America Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 14. Global Plant Phenotyping share by Players 2018 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Plant Phenotyping share by Players (Top 3) 2018(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Plant Phenotyping share by Players (Top 5) 2018(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. LemnaTec (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. LemnaTec (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 20. CropDesign - BASF SE (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. CropDesign - BASF SE (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 22. Heinz Walz (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Heinz Walz (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 24. Photon Systems Instruments (Czech Republic) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Photon Systems Instruments (Czech Republic) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 26. Qubit Systems (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Qubit Systems (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 28. KeyGene (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. KeyGene (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 30. Delta-T Devices (UK) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Delta-T Devices (UK) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 32. Phenospex (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Phenospex (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 34. WPS (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. WPS (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 36. Rothamsted Research (UK) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Rothamsted Research (UK) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 38. The Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (Austria) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. The Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (Austria) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 40. Phenomix (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. Phenomix (France) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 42. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 43. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 44. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Site USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 45. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Analysis Systems USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 46. Global Plant Phenotyping: by Platform USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 47. South America Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 48. Asia Pacific Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. Europe Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 50. MEA Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 51. North America Plant Phenotyping Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • LemnaTec (Germany)
  • CropDesign - BASF SE (Germany)
  • Heinz Walz (Germany)
  • Photon Systems Instruments (Czech Republic)
  • Qubit Systems (Canada)
  • KeyGene (Netherlands)
  • Delta-T Devices (UK)
  • Phenospex (Netherlands)
  • WPS (Netherlands)
  • Rothamsted Research (UK)
  • The Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (Austria)
  • Phenomix (France)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation