Unified Functional Testing Comprehensive Study by Application (Web, Mobile, API, RPA, Enterprise Application Software), Organisation Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises, Government Organizations), Deployment Model (Cloud-Based, On-Premise) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Unified Functional Testing Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Global Unified Functional Testing Market Overview:
For corporate quality assurance, unified functional testing automates functional, regression, and API tests for software applications and environments. Since UFT has a graphical user interface, it can test all three layers of an application, including the interface, service layer, and database layer, from a single console.

Growth Drivers
  • The Growing Popularity of Crowdsourced Testing
  • Need to Provide Seamless End-User Experience With Reduced Time-To-Market

Roadblocks
  • High Cost for Licensing and Maintenance

Opportunities
  • Continuous Development in the IT Sector Globally
  • Increase in Deployment of Mobile-Based Applications

Challenges
  • Lack of Skilled Professionals


Competitive Landscape:
The companies are now exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new developments in existing products, and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are also exploring new geographies and industries through expansions and acquisitions so as to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies.
Some of the key players profiled in the report are Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom), Tricentis (Austria), SmartBear Software (United States), Worksoft, Inc. (United States), IBM (United States), UiPath (United States), HP (United States), Katalon LLC. (United States), Oracle (United States) and BrowserStack (India). Additionally, following companies can also be profiled that are part of our coverage like Sauce Labs (United States) and Inflectra (United States). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Unified Functional Testing market by 2026. Considering Market by Organisation Size, the sub-segment i.e. SMEs will boost the Unified Functional Testing market. Considering Market by Deployment Model, the sub-segment i.e. Cloud-Based will boost the Unified Functional Testing market.

In July 2020, Micro Focus announced AI-powered enhancements to the intelligent testing capabilities of the UFT Family, a unified set of solutions designed to reduce the overall complexity of automating the functional testing processes.

What Can be Explored with the Unified Functional Testing Market Study
 Gain Market Understanding
 Identify Growth Opportunities
 Analyze and Measure the Global Unified Functional Testing Market by Identifying Investment across various Industry Verticals
 Understand the Trends that will drive Future Changes in Unified Functional Testing
 Understand the Competitive Scenario
- Track Right Markets
- Identify the Right Verticals

Research Methodology:
The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Unified Functional Testing market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Unified Functional Testing market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms, New Entrants/Investors, Analysts and Strategic Business Planners, Unified Functional Testing Providers, Technology Providers, Government and Private Organisation, End-User and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Application
  • Web
  • Mobile
  • API
  • RPA
  • Enterprise Application Software
By Organisation Size
  • SMEs
  • Large Enterprises
  • Government Organizations

By Deployment Model
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premise

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. The Growing Popularity of Crowdsourced Testing
      • 3.2.2. Need to Provide Seamless End-User Experience With Reduced Time-To-Market
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Skilled Professionals
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Automate Tests with AI-based Capabilities and Intelligent Automation
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Unified Functional Testing, by Application, Organisation Size, Deployment Model and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Unified Functional Testing (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Web
        • 5.2.1.2. Mobile
        • 5.2.1.3. API
        • 5.2.1.4. RPA
        • 5.2.1.5. Enterprise Application Software
      • 5.2.2. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Organisation Size (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. SMEs
        • 5.2.2.2. Large Enterprises
        • 5.2.2.3. Government Organizations
      • 5.2.3. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Deployment Model (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Cloud-Based
        • 5.2.3.2. On-Premise
      • 5.2.4. Global Unified Functional Testing Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Unified Functional Testing (Price)
  • 6. Unified Functional Testing: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Tricentis (Austria)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. SmartBear Software (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Worksoft, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. IBM (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. UiPath (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. HP (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Katalon LLC. (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Oracle (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. BrowserStack (India)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Unified Functional Testing Sale, by Application, Organisation Size, Deployment Model and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Unified Functional Testing (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Web
        • 7.2.1.2. Mobile
        • 7.2.1.3. API
        • 7.2.1.4. RPA
        • 7.2.1.5. Enterprise Application Software
      • 7.2.2. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Organisation Size (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. SMEs
        • 7.2.2.2. Large Enterprises
        • 7.2.2.3. Government Organizations
      • 7.2.3. Global Unified Functional Testing by: Deployment Model (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Cloud-Based
        • 7.2.3.2. On-Premise
      • 7.2.4. Global Unified Functional Testing Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Unified Functional Testing (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Unified Functional Testing: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Unified Functional Testing Web , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Unified Functional Testing Mobile , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Unified Functional Testing API , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Unified Functional Testing RPA , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Unified Functional Testing Enterprise Application Software , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Unified Functional Testing: by Organisation Size(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Unified Functional Testing SMEs , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Unified Functional Testing Large Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Unified Functional Testing Government Organizations , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Unified Functional Testing: by Deployment Model(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Unified Functional Testing Cloud-Based , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Unified Functional Testing On-Premise , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. China Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. China Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. China Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. India Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. India Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. India Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. France Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. France Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. France Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Unified Functional Testing: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 108. Unified Functional Testing Web , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 109. Unified Functional Testing Mobile , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 110. Unified Functional Testing API , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 111. Unified Functional Testing RPA , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 112. Unified Functional Testing Enterprise Application Software , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 113. Unified Functional Testing: by Organisation Size(USD Million)
  • Table 114. Unified Functional Testing SMEs , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Unified Functional Testing Large Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. Unified Functional Testing Government Organizations , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. Unified Functional Testing: by Deployment Model(USD Million)
  • Table 118. Unified Functional Testing Cloud-Based , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 119. Unified Functional Testing On-Premise , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 120. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. South America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 124. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Brazil Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. Argentina Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Rest of South America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. China Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. China Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. China Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Japan Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. India Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. India Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. India Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. South Korea Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Taiwan Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Australia Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Germany Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. France Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. France Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. France Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Italy Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. United Kingdom Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Netherlands Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Rest of Europe Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. MEA Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Middle East Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Africa Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. North America Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. United States Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Canada Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Mexico Unified Functional Testing, by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 204. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 205. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Organisation Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Deployment Model USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Unified Functional Testing share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Unified Functional Testing share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Unified Functional Testing share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. Tricentis (Austria) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Tricentis (Austria) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. SmartBear Software (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. SmartBear Software (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Worksoft, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Worksoft, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. IBM (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. IBM (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. UiPath (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. UiPath (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. HP (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. HP (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Katalon LLC. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Katalon LLC. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Oracle (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Oracle (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. BrowserStack (India) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. BrowserStack (India) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 37. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Organisation Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Unified Functional Testing: by Deployment Model USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. South America Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. Asia Pacific Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Europe Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. MEA Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. North America Unified Functional Testing Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom)
  • Tricentis (Austria)
  • SmartBear Software (United States)
  • Worksoft, Inc. (United States)
  • IBM (United States)
  • UiPath (United States)
  • HP (United States)
  • Katalon LLC. (United States)
  • Oracle (United States)
  • BrowserStack (India)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Sauce Labs (United States) , Inflectra (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jun 2021 211 Pages 83 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Unified Functional Testing market is expected to see a CAGR of % during projected year 2020 to 2026.
Top performing companies in the Global Unified Functional Testing market are Micro Focus International plc (United Kingdom), Tricentis (Austria), SmartBear Software (United States), Worksoft, Inc. (United States), IBM (United States), UiPath (United States), HP (United States), Katalon LLC. (United States), Oracle (United States) and BrowserStack (India), to name a few.
"Automate Tests with AI-based Capabilities and Intelligent Automation" is seen as one of major influencing trends for Unified Functional Testing Market during projected period 2020-2026.

Know More About Global Unified Functional Testing Report?