Global Computer Assisted Coding

Computer Assisted Coding Comprehensive Study by Application (Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding, Clinical Coding Auditing, Management Reporting and Analytics), End Users (Academic Medical Centers, Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers, Hospitals, Physician Practices, Payers, Other Healthcare Providers), Deployment (On-premise, Cloud) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Computer Assisted Coding Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
What is Computer Assisted Coding Market?

Computer assisted coding operate differently than those of developed manually. It produces medical codes for particular terms in the document. Computer assisted coding has multiple advantages over the manual ones as it increases the efficiency and productivity. However, earlier it was done manually but increasing data had caused it to automate the process. Due to the shift towards the technologically advanced health care systems, there is rise in demand for medical coding. Additionally the integrated computer assisted coding is growing continuously in the market.

The market study is being classified, by Application (Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding, Clinical Coding Auditing and Management Reporting and Analytics) and major geographies with country level break-up.

Optum, Inc. (United States), McKesson Corporation (United States), Nuance Communications Inc. (United States), Cerner Corporation (United States), Precyse Solutions, LLC (United States), Trucode (United States), Craneware Plc. (United Kingdom), Epic Systems Corporation (United States), M-Scribe Technologies, LLC (United States) and ezDI, Inc (United States) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are Coding Strategies, Inc. (United States), Alpha II, LLC (United States), ID GmbH & Co. (Germany), iMedx (United States) and ZyDoc (United States).

Research Analyst at AMA predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Computer Assisted Coding market throughout the predicted period.

Segment Analysis
Analyst at AMA have segmented the market study of Global Computer Assisted Coding market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Computer Assisted Coding has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Increased Accuracy and Reduced Cost of Maintenance
  • Growing Need of Patients Data Management

Market Trend
  • Increasing Adoption of CAC Solutions in Health Care
  • Rapid Implementation of Electronic Health Record

Restraints
  • High Implementation Costs may Hamper the Market
  • Lack of Support of CAC on Site

Opportunities
  • Increasing Adoption of Cloud Based Solutions
  • High Demand in Developing Countries Owing to Rising Investments on Health Care

Challenges
  • Lack of Awareness and Reluctance of CAC Solutions in Emerging Economies


Market Leaders and some development strategies
In 2019, Optum completes acquisition of Davita Medical group due to which Davita Medical group’s care practice will become Intermountain healthcare



Key Target Audience
Manufacturers, Distributors and Traders, Research Organizations, Government Agencies and Organizations

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Application
  • Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding
  • Clinical Coding Auditing
  • Management Reporting and Analytics
By End Users
  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers
  • Hospitals
  • Physician Practices
  • Payers
  • Other Healthcare Providers

By Deployment
  • On-premise
  • Cloud

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increased Accuracy and Reduced Cost of Maintenance
      • 3.2.2. Growing Need of Patients Data Management
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Awareness and Reluctance of CAC Solutions in Emerging Economies
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Adoption of CAC Solutions in Health Care
      • 3.4.2. Rapid Implementation of Electronic Health Record
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Computer Assisted Coding, by Application, End Users, Deployment and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Computer Assisted Coding (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding
        • 5.2.1.2. Clinical Coding Auditing
        • 5.2.1.3. Management Reporting and Analytics
      • 5.2.2. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: End Users (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Academic Medical Centers
        • 5.2.2.2. Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers
        • 5.2.2.3. Hospitals
        • 5.2.2.4. Physician Practices
        • 5.2.2.5. Payers
        • 5.2.2.6. Other Healthcare Providers
      • 5.2.3. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: Deployment (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. On-premise
        • 5.2.3.2. Cloud
      • 5.2.4. Global Computer Assisted Coding Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Computer Assisted Coding: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Optum, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. McKesson Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Nuance Communications Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Cerner Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Precyse Solutions, LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Trucode (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Craneware Plc. (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Epic Systems Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. M-Scribe Technologies, LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. EzDI, Inc (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Computer Assisted Coding Sale, by Application, End Users, Deployment and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Computer Assisted Coding (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding
        • 7.2.1.2. Clinical Coding Auditing
        • 7.2.1.3. Management Reporting and Analytics
      • 7.2.2. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: End Users (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Academic Medical Centers
        • 7.2.2.2. Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers
        • 7.2.2.3. Hospitals
        • 7.2.2.4. Physician Practices
        • 7.2.2.5. Payers
        • 7.2.2.6. Other Healthcare Providers
      • 7.2.3. Global Computer Assisted Coding by: Deployment (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. On-premise
        • 7.2.3.2. Cloud
      • 7.2.4. Global Computer Assisted Coding Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Computer Assisted Coding: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Computer Assisted Coding Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Computer Assisted Coding Clinical Coding Auditing , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Computer Assisted Coding Management Reporting and Analytics , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Computer Assisted Coding: by End Users(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Computer Assisted Coding Academic Medical Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Computer Assisted Coding Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Computer Assisted Coding Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Computer Assisted Coding Physician Practices , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Computer Assisted Coding Payers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Computer Assisted Coding Other Healthcare Providers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Computer Assisted Coding: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 13. Computer Assisted Coding On-premise , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Computer Assisted Coding Cloud , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. China Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. China Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. China Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. India Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. India Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. India Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. France Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. France Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. France Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Computer Assisted Coding: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 109. Computer Assisted Coding Automated Computer-Assisted Encoding , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 110. Computer Assisted Coding Clinical Coding Auditing , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 111. Computer Assisted Coding Management Reporting and Analytics , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 112. Computer Assisted Coding: by End Users(USD Million)
  • Table 113. Computer Assisted Coding Academic Medical Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 114. Computer Assisted Coding Clinical Laboratories and Diagnostic Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Computer Assisted Coding Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. Computer Assisted Coding Physician Practices , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. Computer Assisted Coding Payers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 118. Computer Assisted Coding Other Healthcare Providers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 119. Computer Assisted Coding: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 120. Computer Assisted Coding On-premise , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. Computer Assisted Coding Cloud , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 124. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. Brazil Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Argentina Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. Rest of South America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. China Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. China Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. China Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. Japan Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. India Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. India Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. India Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. South Korea Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Taiwan Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Australia Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Rest of Asia-Pacific Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Germany Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. France Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. France Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. France Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Italy Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. United Kingdom Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Netherlands Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Rest of Europe Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. MEA Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Middle East Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Africa Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. North America Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. United States Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Canada Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Mexico Computer Assisted Coding, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 206. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 207. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Computer Assisted Coding share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Computer Assisted Coding share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Computer Assisted Coding share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Optum, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Optum, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. McKesson Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. McKesson Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Nuance Communications Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Nuance Communications Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Cerner Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Cerner Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Precyse Solutions, LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Precyse Solutions, LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. Trucode (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Trucode (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Craneware Plc. (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Craneware Plc. (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Epic Systems Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Epic Systems Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. M-Scribe Technologies, LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. M-Scribe Technologies, LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. EzDI, Inc (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. EzDI, Inc (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 37. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Computer Assisted Coding: by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. South America Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. Asia Pacific Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Europe Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. MEA Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. North America Computer Assisted Coding Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Optum, Inc. (United States)
  • McKesson Corporation (United States)
  • Nuance Communications Inc. (United States)
  • Cerner Corporation (United States)
  • Precyse Solutions, LLC (United States)
  • Trucode (United States)
  • Craneware Plc. (United Kingdom)
  • Epic Systems Corporation (United States)
  • M-Scribe Technologies, LLC (United States)
  • ezDI, Inc (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Coding Strategies, Inc. (United States) , Alpha II, LLC (United States) , ID GmbH & Co. (Germany) , iMedx (United States) , ZyDoc (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Sep 2021 250 Pages 69 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Computer Assisted Coding Quantitative research analysis
Global Computer Assisted Coding Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

"Increased Accuracy and Reduced Cost of Maintenance " is seen as one of major growth factors of Computer Assisted Coding Market in years to come.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
United States will lead Computer Assisted Coding Market in coming years.

Know More About Global Computer Assisted Coding Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Web Content Filtering Comprehensive Study by Type (Client-Side Filters, Content Limited ISPs, Server-Side Filters, Search-Engine Filters), Application (Business Organizations, Schools and Institution...
$ 3350
Tax Management Software Comprehensive Study by Application (Retail, BFSI, Telecommunication and IT, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Others), Platform (Web, Mobile), End-User (Individual, Commercial Enterp...
$ 3650
Corporate Performance Management Comprehensive Study by Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premises), Organization Size (Small and Medium Size Organizations, Large Size Organizations), Industry Vertica...
$ 3650
Social Collaboration Software Comprehensive Study by Application (Project Management, Social Networking, Conferencing, Others), Category (Enterprise Communication, Enterprise Content Management, Emb...
$ 3750
Contract Lifecycle Management Comprehensive Study by Type (Cloud based, On-premises), Application (Attorneys, Paralegals, Procurement Professionals, Sales Operations Professionals, Other), CLM offeri...
$ 3650
Machine Vision Technology Comprehensive Study by Type (PC Based Machine Vision Technology, Embedded Machine Vision Technology, Smart Cameras Based Machine Vision Technology, Frame Grabber, Lighting, ...
$ 3750