Global Mechanical DVT Device Market

Mechanical DVT Device Comprehensive Study by Application (Cardiovascular, Peripheral Vascular, Neurovascular), End User (Hospitals and Surgical Centers, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes, Others)

Mechanical DVT Device Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2020- 2025

Dec 2020 Edition 239 Pages 216 Tables & Figures

Summary
Market Segments
Table of Content
List of Tables & Figures
Companies Mentioned

Summary

Global Mechanical DVT Device Market Overview:

A deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot that forms in a vein deep inside the body. In most cases, this clot forms inside one of the deep veins of the thigh or lower leg. The rising number of minimally invasive procedures, the growing target patient population, ongoing technological advancements, favorable medical reimbursements, and increasing healthcare expenditure across emerging markets are some key factors propelling the growth of the global mechanical DVT device market.

Growth Drivers

Growing Target Patient Population
Increasing Healthcare Expenditure Across Emerging Markets

Market Trends

Favorable Medical Reimbursement Scenario

Roadblocks

Stringent Regulatory Scenario

Opportunities

Increasing Number of Research Activities in the Field of Thrombectomy
Expanding Application of Ultrasound in Vascular Treatment

Challenges

Limited Availability of Clinical Data to Validate the Therapeutic Efficacy of Clot Retrieval Devices

Competitive Landscape:

Some of the key players profiled in the report are Medtronic plc (Ireland), Boston Scientific Corporation (United States), Johnson & Johnson (United States), Terumo Corporation (Japan), Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Netherlands), Penumbra, Inc. (United States), Abbott Laboratories (United States), Acandis GmbH (Germany), AngioDynamics, Inc. (United States), Minnetronix Medical Inc. (United States), Penumbra (United States) and Stryker (United States). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Mechanical DVT Device market by 2025. Considering Market by End User, the sub-segment i.e. Hospitals and Surgical Centers will boost the Mechanical DVT Device market.

In May 2020, Control Medical Technology announced the FDA cleared the Aspire MAX 7 � 11F Mechanical Thrombectomy platform to remove blood clots from a peripheral vessel.

Available Customization:

Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**
** Confirmation on availability of data would be provided prior to purchase

Research Methodology:

The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Mechanical DVT Device market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Mechanical DVT Device market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes Mechanical DVT Device Manufacturers, Mechanical DVT Device Companies, Potential Technology Investors, Regulatory & Government Bodies, Downstream Vendors, End Users and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.

Market Segments

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Application

Cardiovascular
Peripheral Vascular
Neurovascular

By End User

Hospitals and Surgical Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes
Others

By Regions

Table of Content

1. Market Overview
- 1.1. Introduction
- 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
  - 1.2.1. Research Objective
2. Executive Summary
- 2.1. Introduction
3. Market Dynamics
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. Market Drivers
  - 3.2.1. Growing Target Patient Population
  - 3.2.2. Increasing Healthcare Expenditure Across Emerging Markets
- 3.3. Market Challenges
  - 3.3.1. Limited Availability of Clinical Data to Validate the Therapeutic Efficacy of Clot Retrieval Devices
- 3.4. Market Trends
  - 3.4.1. Favorable Medical Reimbursement Scenario
4. Market Factor Analysis
- 4.1. Porters Five Forces
- 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
- 4.3. PESTEL analysis
- 4.4. Market Entropy
- 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
5. Global Mechanical DVT Device, by Application and End User (value, volume and price ) (2014-2019)
- 5.1. Introduction
- 5.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Value)
  - 5.2.1. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: Application (Value)
    - 5.2.1.1. Cardiovascular
    - 5.2.1.2. Peripheral Vascular
    - 5.2.1.3. Neurovascular
  - 5.2.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: End User (Value)
    - 5.2.2.1. Hospitals and Surgical Centers
    - 5.2.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    - 5.2.2.3. Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes
    - 5.2.2.4. Others
- 5.3. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Volume)
  - 5.3.1. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: Application (Volume)
    - 5.3.1.1. Cardiovascular
    - 5.3.1.2. Peripheral Vascular
    - 5.3.1.3. Neurovascular
  - 5.3.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: End User (Volume)
    - 5.3.2.1. Hospitals and Surgical Centers
    - 5.3.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    - 5.3.2.3. Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes
    - 5.3.2.4. Others
- 5.4. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Price)
6. Mechanical DVT Device: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
- 6.1. Competitive Landscape
  - 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
    - 6.1.1.1. Top 3
    - 6.1.1.2. Top 5
- 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2019)
- 6.3. BCG Matrix
- 6.4. Company Profile
  - 6.4.1. Medtronic plc (Ireland)
    - 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.2. Boston Scientific Corporation (United States)
    - 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.3. Johnson & Johnson (United States)
    - 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.4. Terumo Corporation (Japan)
    - 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.5. Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Netherlands)
    - 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.6. Penumbra, Inc. (United States)
    - 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.7. Abbott Laboratories (United States)
    - 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.8. Acandis GmbH (Germany)
    - 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.9. AngioDynamics, Inc. (United States)
    - 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.10. Minnetronix Medical Inc. (United States)
    - 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.11. Penumbra (United States)
    - 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
  - 6.4.12. Stryker (United States)
    - 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
    - 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
    - 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
    - 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
7. Global Mechanical DVT Device Sale, by Application and End User (value, volume and price ) (2020-2025)
- 7.1. Introduction
- 7.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Value)
  - 7.2.1. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: Application (Value)
    - 7.2.1.1. Cardiovascular
    - 7.2.1.2. Peripheral Vascular
    - 7.2.1.3. Neurovascular
  - 7.2.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: End User (Value)
    - 7.2.2.1. Hospitals and Surgical Centers
    - 7.2.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    - 7.2.2.3. Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes
    - 7.2.2.4. Others
- 7.3. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Volume)
  - 7.3.1. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: Application (Volume)
    - 7.3.1.1. Cardiovascular
    - 7.3.1.2. Peripheral Vascular
    - 7.3.1.3. Neurovascular
  - 7.3.2. Global Mechanical DVT Device by: End User (Volume)
    - 7.3.2.1. Hospitals and Surgical Centers
    - 7.3.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    - 7.3.2.3. Research Laboratories & Academic Institutes
    - 7.3.2.4. Others
- 7.4. Global Mechanical DVT Device (Price)
8. Appendix
- 8.1. Acronyms
9. Methodology and Data Source
- 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
  - 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
  - 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
  - 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
- 9.2. Data Source
  - 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
  - 9.2.2. Primary Sources
- 9.3. Disclaimer

List of Tables & Figures

List of Tables

Table 1. Mechanical DVT Device: by Application(USD Million)
Table 2. Mechanical DVT Device: by End User(USD Million)
Table 3. Mechanical DVT Device Sales: by Application(K Unit)
Table 4. Mechanical DVT Device Sales: by End User(K Unit)
Table 5. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 6. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 7. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 8. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 9. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 10. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 11. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 12. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 13. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 14. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 15. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 16. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
Table 17. Mechanical DVT Device: by Application(USD Million)
Table 18. Mechanical DVT Device: by End User(USD Million)
Table 19. Mechanical DVT Device Sales: by Application(K Unit)
Table 20. Mechanical DVT Device Sales: by End User(K Unit)
Table 21. Research Programs/Design for This Report
Table 22. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
Table 23. Key Data Information from Primary Sources

List of Figures

Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
Figure 4. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by Application USD Million (2014-2019)
Figure 5. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by End User USD Million (2014-2019)
Figure 6. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by Application K Unit (2014-2019)
Figure 7. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by End User K Unit (2014-2019)
Figure 8. Global Mechanical DVT Device share by Players 2019 (%)
Figure 9. Global Mechanical DVT Device share by Players (Top 3) 2019(%)
Figure 10. Global Mechanical DVT Device share by Players (Top 5) 2019(%)
Figure 11. BCG Matrix for key Companies
Figure 12. Medtronic plc (Ireland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 13. Medtronic plc (Ireland) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 14. Boston Scientific Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 15. Boston Scientific Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 16. Johnson & Johnson (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 17. Johnson & Johnson (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 18. Terumo Corporation (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 19. Terumo Corporation (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 20. Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 21. Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 22. Penumbra, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 23. Penumbra, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 24. Abbott Laboratories (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 25. Abbott Laboratories (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 26. Acandis GmbH (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 27. Acandis GmbH (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 28. AngioDynamics, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 29. AngioDynamics, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 30. Minnetronix Medical Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 31. Minnetronix Medical Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 32. Penumbra (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 33. Penumbra (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 34. Stryker (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
Figure 35. Stryker (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
Figure 36. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by Application USD Million (2020-2025)
Figure 37. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by End User USD Million (2020-2025)
Figure 38. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by Application K Unit (2020-2025)
Figure 39. Global Mechanical DVT Device: by End User K Unit (2020-2025)