Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market
Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market

Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Comprehensive Study by Type (Systems (Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System), Accessories and Consumables (Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others)), End-Users (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Diagnostic Centers, Specialty Clinics), Mode (Portable Devices, Cart-based Devices) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2021- 2026  

Apr 2021 Edition 200 Pages 216 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
What is Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market Scope?
Blood flow to the skin is recognized as one of the important factors in the assessment of wound healing potential. Over the past few years, skin perfusion pressure testing has emerged as an accurate technique to evaluate the blood flow to impaired tissue. Skin perfusion pressure testing devices are} non-invasive tube testing devices that are accustomed to measure blood flow speed and verify segmental blood pressures, like ankle-brachial index (ABI). Skin perfusion pressure is a pressure required for the restoration of microcirculatory blood flow in the skin. The skin perfusion pressure devices are used in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial diseases such as critical limb ischemia, and to determine wound healing potential, optimum amputation level, etc. Typically, 20% of critical limb ischemia patients develop tissue loss or unresolved pain, 30% of patients develop the risk of amputation within the first year of diagnosis, and 25% die within a year. Skin perfusion pressure testing can be used to avoid these complications by examining the microcirculatory system. The chronic lower extremity wound leaves a huge clinical and financial burden on the patients and skin perfusion pressure testing devices offer the best possible prediction of wound healing success to such patients, and conjointly offer objective input to guide treatment choices. Lower extremity wounds are common in patients with the polygenic disease and early assessment of diabetic foot ulcers may forestall the chance of amputation. The market for skin perfusion pressure testing devices has seen quick growth in the last few years because skin perfusion pressure testing is nowadays used irreplaceably for toe pressure measurement.

The Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices market study is being classified by Type (Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System] and Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others]) and major geographies with country level break-up.

The companies are exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new service launches, and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are exploring new geographies through expansions and acquisitions to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Research Analyst at AMA predicts that Players from United States will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices market throughout the predicted period.

Vasamed Incorporated (United States), Moor Instruments (United Kingdom), Perimed AB (Sweden), CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC (United States), ELCAT (Germany), Promed Group Co., Ltd. (China), Shenzhen Ricso Technology Co., Ltd. (China), Shenzhen Bestman Instrument Co., Ltd. (China), Viasonix (Australia) and Biomedix (Collaborative Care Diagnostics, LLC) (United States) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are Koven Technology, Inc. (United States) and Newman Medical (United States).

Segmentation Analysis
Analyst at AMA have segmented the market study of Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico).


According to the FDA Modernization Act, devices that fall under Class I and II are exempt from market approval. This reduces the time required for regulatory approval, which lowers costs. It is required to apply for a 510 (k) Premarket Notification with the FDA, which proves that the device is safe, effective, and complies with a legally marketed device.

Influencing Market Trend
  • Adoption of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices over Conventional Techniques

Market Drivers
  • Growing Penetration of These Devices in Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgical Centres
  • Growing Prevalence of Diabetic Patients

Opportunities
  • Growing Advancement in the Healthcare Centres

Restraints
  • High Cost of the Devices

Challenges
  • Lack of Skilled and Trained Professional


Key Target Audience
New Entrants/Investors, Analysts and Strategic Business Planners, Manufacturers of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, Suppliers and Distributors of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms and End-Use Industry

Customization available in this Study:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.

To compete effectively, companies also require quantitative estimates of the future growth and qualitative nature of the market. AMA Research & Media features not just specific market sizing estimates, but also include significant value-added commentary on Technological Trends and Innovations, Regulatory Policies, Market Maturity Indicators, Market Share Movements, New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers, Consumer Demographics, Supporting Company Financial and Cash Flow Planning, Open Up New Markets , To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities, Key Decision in Planning and to Further Expand Market Share, Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis.
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System]
  • Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others]
By End-Users
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Diagnostic Centers
  • Specialty Clinics

By Mode
  • Portable Devices
  • Cart-based Devices

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing Penetration of These Devices in Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgical Centres
      • 3.2.2. Growing Prevalence of Diabetic Patients
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Skilled and Trained Professional
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Adoption of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices over Conventional Techniques
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type, End-Users, Mode and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System]
        • 5.2.1.2. Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others]
      • 5.2.2. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: End-Users (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Hospitals
        • 5.2.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
        • 5.2.2.3. Diagnostic Centers
        • 5.2.2.4. Specialty Clinics
      • 5.2.3. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: Mode (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Portable Devices
        • 5.2.3.2. Cart-based Devices
      • 5.2.4. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Vasamed Incorporated (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Moor Instruments (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Perimed AB (Sweden)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. ELCAT (Germany)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Promed Group Co., Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Shenzhen Ricso Technology Co., Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Shenzhen Bestman Instrument Co., Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Viasonix (Australia)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Biomedix (Collaborative Care Diagnostics, LLC) (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Sale, by Type, End-Users, Mode and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System]
        • 7.2.1.2. Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others]
      • 7.2.2. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: End-Users (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Hospitals
        • 7.2.2.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
        • 7.2.2.3. Diagnostic Centers
        • 7.2.2.4. Specialty Clinics
      • 7.2.3. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices by: Mode (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Portable Devices
        • 7.2.3.2. Cart-based Devices
      • 7.2.4. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by End-Users(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Ambulatory Surgical Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Diagnostic Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Specialty Clinics , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Mode(USD Million)
  • Table 10. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Portable Devices , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Cart-based Devices , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 96. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 106. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Systems [Laser Doppler SPP System, Photoplethysmography System, Ultrasound System] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 107. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Accessories and Consumables [Pressure Cuffs, Electrodes, Probes, Others] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 108. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by End-Users(USD Million)
  • Table 109. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 110. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Ambulatory Surgical Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 111. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Diagnostic Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 112. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Specialty Clinics , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 113. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Mode(USD Million)
  • Table 114. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Portable Devices , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Cart-based Devices , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 118. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 119. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 120. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. Brazil Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 124. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. Argentina Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. Rest of South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. China Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. Japan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. India Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. South Korea Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Taiwan Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Australia Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Rest of Asia-Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Germany Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. France Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Italy Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. United Kingdom Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Netherlands Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Rest of Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Middle East Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Africa Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. United States Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Canada Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Mexico Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices, by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 200. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 201. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by End-Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Mode USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Vasamed Incorporated (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Vasamed Incorporated (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. Moor Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Moor Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Perimed AB (Sweden) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Perimed AB (Sweden) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. ELCAT (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. ELCAT (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. Promed Group Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Promed Group Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Shenzhen Ricso Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Shenzhen Ricso Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Shenzhen Bestman Instrument Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Shenzhen Bestman Instrument Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Viasonix (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Viasonix (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. Biomedix (Collaborative Care Diagnostics, LLC) (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Biomedix (Collaborative Care Diagnostics, LLC) (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 37. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by End-Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices: by Mode USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. South America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. Asia Pacific Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Europe Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. MEA Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. North America Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Vasamed Incorporated (United States)
  • Moor Instruments (United Kingdom)
  • Perimed AB (Sweden)
  • CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC (United States)
  • ELCAT (Germany)
  • Promed Group Co., Ltd. (China)
  • Shenzhen Ricso Technology Co., Ltd. (China)
  • Shenzhen Bestman Instrument Co., Ltd. (China)
  • Viasonix (Australia)
  • Biomedix (Collaborative Care Diagnostics, LLC) (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Koven Technology, Inc. (United States) , Newman Medical (United States)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation