Global Monitoring As A Service Market
Global Monitoring As A Service Market

Monitoring As A Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Hybrid Cloud), Application (Server Monitoring, Website Monitoring, Network Monitoring, Application Monitoring, Others), Component (Solution, Service) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Monitoring As A Service Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2021- 2026  

Sep 2021 Edition 223 Pages 218 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Global Monitoring As A Service Market Overview:
Monitoring-as-a-Service is an outsourced service to provide security mainly to platforms that are run on the Internet for conducting business. Maas became highly popular in the last decade. Since the advent of Cloud hosting, its popularity has increased even more. Safe monitoring involves protecting a company or other institution from cyber threats, in which a team prepared is crucial to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and access to IT assets. However, time and resources constrain the limits of security operations and their effectiveness for the vast majority of companies. With this, it is vital to continue vigilance on security infrastructure and information.

Growth Drivers
  • Rising essential of cost-effective management and security solutions

Roadblocks
  • High technological expertise and high costs

Opportunities
  • Rising demand for Internet of things (IoT) technology

Challenges
  • Limited Visibility


Competitive Landscape:
The global market is highly competitive and consists of a limited number of providers who compete with each other. The intense competition, changing consumer-spending patterns, demographic trends, and frequent changes in consumer preferences pose significant opportunities for market growth.
Some of the key players profiled in the report are Sematext (United States), Netreo (United States), CloudMonix (United States), Datadog (United States), New Relic (United States), Zenoss (United States), Microsoft (United States), Broadcom (United States), Dynatrace (United States) and Amazon (AWS) (United States). Additionally, following companies can also be profiled that are part of our coverage like CloudRadar (Germany), Paessler (Germany) and LogicMonitor (United States). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Monitoring As A Service market by 2026. Considering Market by Component, the sub-segment i.e. Solution will boost the Monitoring As A Service market.

On 1 December 2020 Amazon Web Services, Inc. (AWS), an Amazon.com company, announced Amazon Monitron, Amazon Lookout for Equipment, the AWS Panorama Appliance, the AWS Panorama SDK, and Amazon Lookout for Vision., and On 21 Jun 2021 Nihon Kohden America, a U.S. market leader in precision medical products and services,announced the launch of its NK Network CareSM Service Program, an all-inclusive solution that bundles critical maintenance and security systems together to help monitor, maintain and secure network systems using Nihon Kohden hardware and software.

What Can be Explored with the Monitoring As A Service Market Study
 Gain Market Understanding
 Identify Growth Opportunities
 Analyze and Measure the Global Monitoring As A Service Market by Identifying Investment across various Industry Verticals
 Understand the Trends that will drive Future Changes in Monitoring As A Service
 Understand the Competitive Scenario
- Track Right Markets
- Identify the Right Verticals

Research Methodology:
The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Monitoring As A Service market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Monitoring As A Service market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes Monitoring As A Service Providers, New Entrants and Investors, Venture Capitalists, Government Bodies, Corporate Entities, Government and Private Research Organizations and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

1. What is the growth rate predicted for the Global Monitoring As A Service Market?
The Monitoring As A Service market is expected to see a CAGR of % during projected year 2020 to 2026.

2. Who are the top performing companies in Monitoring As A Service Market?
Top performing companies in the Global Monitoring As A Service market are Sematext (United States), Netreo (United States), CloudMonix (United States), Datadog (United States), New Relic (United States), Zenoss (United States), Microsoft (United States), Broadcom (United States), Dynatrace (United States) and Amazon (AWS) (United States), to name a few.

3. What trending factors would impact Monitoring As A Service Market growth most?
"Increased adoption of Monitoring As A Service in various industries" is seen as one of major influencing trends for Monitoring As A Service Market during projected period 2020-2026.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Public Cloud
  • Private Cloud
  • Hybrid Cloud
By Application
  • Server Monitoring
  • Website Monitoring
  • Network Monitoring
  • Application Monitoring
  • Others
By Component
  • Solution
  • Service

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Rising essential of cost-effective management and security solutions
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Limited Visibility
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increased adoption of Monitoring As A Service in various industries
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Monitoring As A Service, by Type, Application, Component and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Monitoring As A Service (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Public Cloud
        • 5.2.1.2. Private Cloud
        • 5.2.1.3. Hybrid Cloud
      • 5.2.2. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Server Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.2. Website Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.3. Network Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.4. Application Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.5. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Component (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Solution
        • 5.2.3.2. Service
      • 5.2.4. Global Monitoring As A Service Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Monitoring As A Service (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Monitoring As A Service: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Sematext (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Netreo (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. CloudMonix (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Datadog (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. New Relic (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Zenoss (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Microsoft (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Broadcom (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Dynatrace (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Amazon (AWS) (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Monitoring As A Service Sale, by Type, Application, Component and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Monitoring As A Service (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Public Cloud
        • 7.2.1.2. Private Cloud
        • 7.2.1.3. Hybrid Cloud
      • 7.2.2. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Server Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.2. Website Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.3. Network Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.4. Application Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.5. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Component (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Solution
        • 7.2.3.2. Service
      • 7.2.4. Global Monitoring As A Service Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Monitoring As A Service (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Monitoring As A Service by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Monitoring As A Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Monitoring As A Service Public Cloud , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Monitoring As A Service Private Cloud , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Monitoring As A Service Hybrid Cloud , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Monitoring As A Service: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Monitoring As A Service Server Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Monitoring As A Service Website Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Monitoring As A Service Network Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Monitoring As A Service Application Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Monitoring As A Service Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Monitoring As A Service: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Monitoring As A Service Solution , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Monitoring As A Service Service , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. China Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. China Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. China Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. India Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. India Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. India Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. France Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. France Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. France Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Monitoring As A Service: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Monitoring As A Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 109. Monitoring As A Service Public Cloud , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 110. Monitoring As A Service Private Cloud , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 111. Monitoring As A Service Hybrid Cloud , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 112. Monitoring As A Service: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 113. Monitoring As A Service Server Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 114. Monitoring As A Service Website Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Monitoring As A Service Network Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. Monitoring As A Service Application Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. Monitoring As A Service Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 118. Monitoring As A Service: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 119. Monitoring As A Service Solution , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 120. Monitoring As A Service Service , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 124. South America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. Brazil Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. Argentina Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. Rest of South America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. China Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. China Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. China Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Japan Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. India Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. India Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. India Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. South Korea Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Taiwan Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Australia Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Rest of Asia-Pacific Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Germany Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. France Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. France Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. France Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Italy Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. United Kingdom Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Netherlands Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Rest of Europe Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. MEA Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Middle East Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Africa Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. North America Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. United States Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Canada Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Mexico Monitoring As A Service, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Monitoring As A Service: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 205. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 206. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 207. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Type USD/Units (2015-2020)
  • Figure 13. Global Monitoring As A Service share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Monitoring As A Service share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Monitoring As A Service share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. Sematext (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Sematext (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 19. Netreo (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Netreo (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 21. CloudMonix (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. CloudMonix (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 23. Datadog (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Datadog (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 25. New Relic (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. New Relic (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 27. Zenoss (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Zenoss (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 29. Microsoft (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Microsoft (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 31. Broadcom (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Broadcom (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 33. Dynatrace (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Dynatrace (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 35. Amazon (AWS) (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Amazon (AWS) (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 37. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. South America Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Asia Pacific Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Europe Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. MEA Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. North America Monitoring As A Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. Global Monitoring As A Service: by Type USD/Units (2021-2026)
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Sematext (United States)
  • Netreo (United States)
  • CloudMonix (United States)
  • Datadog (United States)
  • New Relic (United States)
  • Zenoss (United States)
  • Microsoft (United States)
  • Broadcom (United States)
  • Dynatrace (United States)
  • Amazon (AWS) (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
CloudRadar (Germany) , Paessler (Germany) , LogicMonitor (United States)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation