Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market
Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market

Automated Breach Attack Simulation Comprehensive Study by Application (Configuration management, Patch management, Threat intelligence, Other), Component (Software, Platform, Services), End User (Managed Service provider, Enterprises, Data Centers) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2021- 2026  

Oct 2021 Edition 245 Pages 218 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market Overview:
Automated breach and attack simulation (BAS) solution offers a novel and highly effective approach to testing and security. Automated breach and attack testing allows to measure and manage cybersecurity effectiveness and improve your security operations. BAS platforms are put to use by validating that security controls work as intended and at scale. Breach and attack simulation (BAS) is a relatively new IT security technology that can automatically spot vulnerabilities in an organization's cyber defenses, akin to continuous, automated penetration testing. As the industry develops, several vendors refer to advanced BAS solutions as security validation.

Growth Drivers
  • Increasing awareness related to advance cyber security technology

Roadblocks
  • BAS solutions fairly expensive and availability free or low-cost options

Opportunities
  • Increase adoption in banking and financial sector

Challenges
  • Technical issue and complexity of security controls


Competitive Landscape:
The global market is highly competitive and consists of a limited number of providers who compete with each other. The intense competition, changing consumer-spending patterns, demographic trends, and frequent changes in consumer preferences pose significant opportunities for market growth.
Some of the key players profiled in the report are AttackIQ (United States), CyCognito (United States), Cymulate (Israel), DXC Technology (United States), FireEye’s Mandiant (United States), FireMon (United States), Picus Security (United States), Qualys (United States), Rapid7 (United States), SafeBreach (Israel) and XM Cyber (Israel). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation market by 2026. Considering Market by Component, the sub-segment i.e. Software will boost the Automated Breach Attack Simulation market. Considering Market by End User, the sub-segment i.e. Managed Service provider will boost the Automated Breach Attack Simulation market.

What Can be Explored with the Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market Study
 Gain Market Understanding
 Identify Growth Opportunities
 Analyze and Measure the Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market by Identifying Investment across various Industry Verticals
 Understand the Trends that will drive Future Changes in Automated Breach Attack Simulation
 Understand the Competitive Scenario
- Track Right Markets
- Identify the Right Verticals

Research Methodology:
The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Automated Breach Attack Simulation market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes Automated Breach Attack Simulation Provider, New Entrants and Investors, Venture Capitalists, Government Bodies, Corporate Entities, Government and Private Research Organizations and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

1. What is the growth rate predicted for the Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market?
The Automated Breach Attack Simulation market is expected to see a CAGR of % during projected year 2020 to 2026.

2. Who are the top performing companies in Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market?
Top performing companies in the Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation market are AttackIQ (United States), CyCognito (United States), Cymulate (Israel), DXC Technology (United States), FireEye’s Mandiant (United States), FireMon (United States), Picus Security (United States), Qualys (United States), Rapid7 (United States), SafeBreach (Israel) and XM Cyber (Israel), to name a few.

3. What trending factors would impact Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market growth most?
"Rise demand for prioritizing seucrity investments" is seen as one of major influencing trends for Automated Breach Attack Simulation Market during projected period 2020-2026.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Application
  • Configuration management
  • Patch management
  • threat intelligence
  • Other
By Component
  • Software
  • Platform
  • Services

By End User
  • Managed Service provider
  • Enterprises
  • Data Centers

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing awareness related to advance cyber security technology
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Technical issue and complexity of security controls
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Rise demand for prioritizing seucrity investments
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application, Component, End User and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Configuration management
        • 5.2.1.2. Patch management
        • 5.2.1.3. Threat intelligence
        • 5.2.1.4. Other
      • 5.2.2. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: Component (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Software
        • 5.2.2.2. Platform
        • 5.2.2.3. Services
      • 5.2.3. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: End User (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Managed Service provider
        • 5.2.3.2. Enterprises
        • 5.2.3.3. Data Centers
      • 5.2.4. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. AttackIQ (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. CyCognito (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Cymulate (Israel)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. DXC Technology (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. FireEye’s Mandiant (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. FireMon (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Picus Security (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Qualys (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Rapid7 (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. SafeBreach (Israel)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. XM Cyber (Israel)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Sale, by Application, Component, End User and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Configuration management
        • 7.2.1.2. Patch management
        • 7.2.1.3. Threat intelligence
        • 7.2.1.4. Other
      • 7.2.2. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: Component (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Software
        • 7.2.2.2. Platform
        • 7.2.2.3. Services
      • 7.2.3. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation by: End User (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Managed Service provider
        • 7.2.3.2. Enterprises
        • 7.2.3.3. Data Centers
      • 7.2.4. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Configuration management , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Patch management , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Threat intelligence , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Other , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Software , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Platform , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Services , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 11. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Managed Service provider , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Data Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 109. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Configuration management , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 110. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Patch management , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 111. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Threat intelligence , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 112. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Other , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 113. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 114. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Software , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Platform , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Services , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 118. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Managed Service provider , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 119. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 120. Automated Breach Attack Simulation Data Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 124. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. Brazil Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. Argentina Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. Rest of South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. China Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Japan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. India Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. South Korea Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Taiwan Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Australia Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Germany Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. France Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Italy Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. United Kingdom Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Netherlands Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Rest of Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Middle East Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Africa Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. United States Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Canada Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Mexico Automated Breach Attack Simulation, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 205. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 206. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Component USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. AttackIQ (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. AttackIQ (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. CyCognito (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. CyCognito (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Cymulate (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Cymulate (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. DXC Technology (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. DXC Technology (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. FireEye’s Mandiant (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. FireEye’s Mandiant (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. FireMon (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. FireMon (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Picus Security (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Picus Security (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Qualys (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Qualys (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Rapid7 (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Rapid7 (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. SafeBreach (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. SafeBreach (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. XM Cyber (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. XM Cyber (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by Component USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Automated Breach Attack Simulation: by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. South America Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Automated Breach Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • AttackIQ (United States)
  • CyCognito (United States)
  • Cymulate (Israel)
  • DXC Technology (United States)
  • FireEye’s Mandiant (United States)
  • FireMon (United States)
  • Picus Security (United States)
  • Qualys (United States)
  • Rapid7 (United States)
  • SafeBreach (Israel)
  • XM Cyber (Israel)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation