Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market

Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Comprehensive Study by Enterprise Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises), End-user (Researchers, Scientists, Pharmaceuticals, BFSI, Aviation, Transportation & Logistics, Others) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2027

Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market Overview:

AttributesDetails
Study Period2017-2027
Base Year2021
Forecast Period2022-2027
Historical Period2017-2021
UnitValue (USD Million)
Customization ScopeAvail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility


Influencing Trend:
Increased Focus on Quantum Computing Research by Global Key Players

Market Growth Drivers:
Increasing Demand for Quantum Computing as s Service to Solve Complex Problems of Business and Huge Investment by Government Towards the Mission on Development of Quantum Technologies and Applications

Restraints:
High Cost of Quantum Computing as a Service Platforms

Opportunities:
Growing Popularity of Quantum Computing To Solve Real-World Problems

Competitive Landscape:
The key manufacturers are targeting the innovations of the service with better quality, better technical characteristics, and also assist in providing and humanizing the after-sale service to the consumers. The key players are probable to keep a stronghold on the market over the anticipated period. The key players are accepting strategic decisions and are thinking upon mergers and acquisitions in order to maintain their presence in the market
Some of the key players profiled in the report are IBM (United States), AWS (United States), Google (United States), Microsoft (United States), Honeywell (United States), D‑Wave Systems (Canada), IonQ (United States), Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada), Rigetti Computing (United States) and Canbridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market by 2027. Considering Market by Enterprise Size, the sub-segment i.e. SMEs will boost the Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market. Considering Market by End-user, the sub-segment i.e. Researchers will boost the Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market.

What Can be Explored with the Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market Study
 Gain Market Understanding
 Identify Growth Opportunities
 Analyze and Measure the Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market by Identifying Investment across various Industry Verticals
 Understand the Trends that will drive Future Changes in Quantum Computing-as-a-Service
 Understand the Competitive Scenario
- Track Right Markets
- Identify the Right Verticals

Research Methodology:
The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes New Entrants/Investors, Analysts and Strategic Business Planners, Quantum Computing as a Service Providers, Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms, Government Regulatory and Research Organizations, End-Users and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Enterprise Size
  • SMEs
  • Large Enterprises

By End-user
  • Researchers
  • Scientists
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • BFSI
  • Aviation
  • Transportation & Logistics
  • Others

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing Demand for Quantum Computing as s Service to Solve Complex Problems of Business
      • 3.2.2. Huge Investment by Government Towards the Mission on Development of Quantum Technologies and Applications
    • 3.3. Market Trends
      • 3.3.1. Increased Focus on Quantum Computing Research by Global Key Players
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size, End-user and Region (value) (2016-2021)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service by: Enterprise Size (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. SMEs
        • 5.2.1.2. Large Enterprises
      • 5.2.2. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service by: End-user (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Researchers
        • 5.2.2.2. Scientists
        • 5.2.2.3. Pharmaceuticals
        • 5.2.2.4. BFSI
        • 5.2.2.5. Aviation
        • 5.2.2.6. Transportation & Logistics
        • 5.2.2.7. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Region
        • 5.2.3.1. South America
          • 5.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.3.2.1. China
          • 5.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.3.2.3. India
          • 5.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.3.2.5. Australia
          • 5.2.3.2.6. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.3.3. Europe
          • 5.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.3.3.2. France
          • 5.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.3.4. MEA
          • 5.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.3.5. North America
          • 5.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.3.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2021)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. IBM (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. AWS (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Google (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Microsoft (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Honeywell (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. D‑Wave Systems (Canada)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. IonQ (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Rigetti Computing (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Canbridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Sale, by Enterprise Size, End-user and Region (value) (2022-2027)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service by: Enterprise Size (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. SMEs
        • 7.2.1.2. Large Enterprises
      • 7.2.2. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service by: End-user (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Researchers
        • 7.2.2.2. Scientists
        • 7.2.2.3. Pharmaceuticals
        • 7.2.2.4. BFSI
        • 7.2.2.5. Aviation
        • 7.2.2.6. Transportation & Logistics
        • 7.2.2.7. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Region
        • 7.2.3.1. South America
          • 7.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.3.2.1. China
          • 7.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.3.2.3. India
          • 7.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.3.2.5. Australia
          • 7.2.3.2.6. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.3.3. Europe
          • 7.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.3.3.2. France
          • 7.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.3.4. MEA
          • 7.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.3.5. North America
          • 7.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.3.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service SMEs , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 3. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Large Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 4. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by End-user(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Researchers , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 6. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Scientists , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 7. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Pharmaceuticals , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 8. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service BFSI , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 9. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Aviation , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 10. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Transportation & Logistics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 11. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Others , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 12. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 13. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 14. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 15. Brazil Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 16. Brazil Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 17. Argentina Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 18. Argentina Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 19. Rest of South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 20. Rest of South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 21. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 22. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 23. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 24. China Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 25. China Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 26. Japan Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 27. Japan Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 28. India Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 29. India Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 30. South Korea Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 31. South Korea Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 32. Australia Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 33. Australia Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 34. Rest of Asia-Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 35. Rest of Asia-Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 36. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 37. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 38. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 39. Germany Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 40. Germany Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 41. France Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 42. France Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 43. Italy Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 44. Italy Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 45. United Kingdom Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 46. United Kingdom Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 47. Netherlands Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 48. Netherlands Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 49. Rest of Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 50. Rest of Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 51. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 52. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 53. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 54. Middle East Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 55. Middle East Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 56. Africa Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 57. Africa Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 58. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 59. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 60. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 61. United States Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 62. United States Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 63. Canada Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 64. Canada Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 65. Mexico Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 66. Mexico Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 67. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 68. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 69. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 70. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 71. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 72. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 73. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 74. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 75. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 76. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 77. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size(USD Million)
  • Table 78. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service SMEs , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 79. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Large Enterprises , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 80. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by End-user(USD Million)
  • Table 81. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Researchers , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 82. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Scientists , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 83. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Pharmaceuticals , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 84. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service BFSI , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 85. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Aviation , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 86. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Transportation & Logistics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 87. Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Others , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 88. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 89. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 90. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 91. Brazil Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 92. Brazil Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 93. Argentina Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 94. Argentina Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 95. Rest of South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 96. Rest of South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 97. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 98. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 99. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 100. China Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 101. China Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 102. Japan Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 103. Japan Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 104. India Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 105. India Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 106. South Korea Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 107. South Korea Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 108. Australia Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 109. Australia Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 110. Rest of Asia-Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 111. Rest of Asia-Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 112. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 113. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 114. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 115. Germany Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 116. Germany Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 117. France Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 118. France Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 119. Italy Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 120. Italy Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 121. United Kingdom Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 122. United Kingdom Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 123. Netherlands Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 124. Netherlands Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 125. Rest of Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 126. Rest of Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 127. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 128. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 129. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 130. Middle East Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 131. Middle East Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 132. Africa Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 133. Africa Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 134. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 135. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 136. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 137. United States Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 138. United States Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 139. Canada Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 140. Canada Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 141. Mexico Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 142. Mexico Quantum Computing-as-a-Service, by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 143. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 144. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 145. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 5. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by End-user USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 6. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 7. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service share by Players 2021 (%)
  • Figure 12. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service share by Players (Top 3) 2021(%)
  • Figure 13. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service share by Players (Top 5) 2021(%)
  • Figure 14. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 15. IBM (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 16. IBM (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 17. AWS (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. AWS (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 19. Google (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Google (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 21. Microsoft (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Microsoft (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 23. Honeywell (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Honeywell (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 25. D‑Wave Systems (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. D‑Wave Systems (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 27. IonQ (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. IonQ (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 29. Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 31. Rigetti Computing (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Rigetti Computing (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 33. Canbridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Canbridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 35. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 36. Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service: by End-user USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 37. South America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. Asia Pacific Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 39. Europe Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. MEA Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. North America Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • IBM (United States)
  • AWS (United States)
  • Google (United States)
  • Microsoft (United States)
  • Honeywell (United States)
  • D‑Wave Systems (Canada)
  • IonQ (United States)
  • Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada)
  • Rigetti Computing (United States)
  • Canbridge Quantum Computing (United Kingdom)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jun 2023 203 Pages 76 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Top performing companies in the Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service market are IBM (United States), AWS (United States), Google (United States), Microsoft (United States), Honeywell (United States), D&
"Increased Focus on Quantum Computing Research by Global Key Players" is seen as one of major influencing trends for Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market during projected period 2021-2027.

Know More About Global Quantum Computing-as-a-Service Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Computer Numerical Control Machine Comprehensive Study by Type (Lathe Machines, Milling Machines, Welding Machines, Laser Machines, Grinding Machines, Others), Application (Healthcare, Automobiles, E...
$ 3650
AV Over IP Software Comprehensive Study by Type (1G, 10G), Connectivity (Extension, Distribution, Switching, Matrixing, Streaming), End-User (Business & Corporate, Entertainment, Healthcare, Educati...
$ 3450
Motion Graphics Comprehensive Study by Type (3D Modeling, Visual Effects), Deployment Mode (On-premise, Cloud), Component (Software, Services), End User (Media & Entertainment, Architecture & Constru...
$ 3650
Geology & Mine Planning Software Comprehensive Study by Type (Geology (Geological Model), Mine Design, Plan and Scheduling, Others), Deployment Mode (Cloud Based, On-Premises), Organization Size (Sma...
$ 3450
UI Test Automation Software Comprehensive Study by Application (Mobile, Web, Desktop, Apps), Size (Small and Medium Enterprise, Large Enterprise), Deployment (On-Premise, Cloud-based) Players and Reg...
$ 3500
Preventive Risk Analytics Comprehensive Study by Application (Large Enterprises, Small & Medium Enterprises), Risk (Financial risk (Delinquency Modeling, Credit Worthiness, Transaction Fraud, Billin...
$ 3750