Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market

Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Comprehensive Study by Type (Low-level Waste, Intermediate-level Waste, High-level Waste), Form (Liquid, Solid, Gas), Reactor (Boiling Water Reactor, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor, Gas Cooled Reactor, Other), Source (Nuclear Power Reactors, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities, Research, Medical, and Industrial Source, Military and Defence Programs, Other Sources) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2030

Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2024-2030 | CAGR: 1.5%  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
About Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management
Spent fuel is nuclear fuel that has been removed from a nuclear power or research reactor after it has been irradiated. It is a mix of plutonium, uranium, and waste that can no longer be used as fuel. It is extremely radioactive and produces a lot of heat, so it must be handled carefully. Nuclear waste is also referred to as reactor waste. Nuclear waste is the material that remains after nuclear fuel has been used in a reactor. Nuclear waste is classified into three types: low-level waste, high-level waste, and intermediate-level waste. Increasing energy demands, as well as a growing reliance on fossil fuels, will contribute to the growth of the global nuclear waste management market. There are several types of reactors used for nuclear waste management such as Pressurized Water Reactor, Boiling Water Reactor, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor, and Gas-Cooled Reactor.

AttributesDetails
Study Period2018-2030
Base Year2023
High Growth MarketAsia Pacific
UnitValue (USD Million)
CAGR1.5%


The market of Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management is fragmented as it consists of major as well as emerging players. They are looking for a new product launches or expansions to gain a competitive advantage in upcoming years. Analyst at AMA Research estimates that United States Manufacturers will contribute the maximum growth to Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market throughout the forecasted period. Established and emerging Manufacturers should take a closer view at their existing organizations and reinvent traditional business and operating models to adapt to the future.

Fluor Corporation (United States), Areva SA (France), Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States), Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan), Holtec International Inc., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan), Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Bechtel Group Inc. (United States), Chase Environmental Group (United States) and Perma-Fix Environmental Services are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research coverage are Magnox Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Veolia Environment SA, Studsvik AB, Enercon Services Inc., EnergySolutions, Stericycle, Inc. and Pangea Resources.

Segmentation Overview
AMA Research has segmented the market of Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market by Type (Low-level Waste, Intermediate-level Waste and High-level Waste) and Region. On the basis of Type, Low-level Waste are dominating the market in the year 2023



On the basis of geography, the market of Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Form, the sub-segment i.e. Liquid will boost the Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Reactor, the sub-segment i.e. Boiling Water Reactor will boost the Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Source, the sub-segment i.e. Nuclear Power Reactors will boost the Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Influencing Trend:
High Installation of Pressurized Water Reactors and Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources

Market Growth Drivers:
Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources and Rising Demand Due to Growing Environmental Concerns

Challenges:
Growing Risk-Related With Transportation of Nuclear Waste

Restraints:
High Cost of Nuclear Waste Management System

Opportunities:
Rising Demand Due To Growing Environmental Concerns and Huge Demand Due To Regulations for Better Usage of Efficient Fuels

Market Leaders and their expansionary development strategies
In January 2018, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has collaborated with the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA) to advance a variety of technologies including the commercialization of Perma-Fix Medical, S.A.'s process to produce Technetium-99 (Tc-99m), the most widely used medical isotope in the world.
In August 2020, The US Department of Energy announced that it authorized the start of radioactive operations at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at its Savannah River Site (SRS). The first-of-a-kind facility is expected to process 31 million gallons of radioactive salt waste currently stored in underground tanks at the South Carolina location.


Key Target Audience
Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Providers, Industry Association, Downstream Vendors, Government Regularity Bodies, Private and Government Research Organization and Others

About Approach
To evaluate and validate the market size various sources including primary and secondary analysis is utilized. AMA Research follows regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have a better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with the purpose to understand the companies positioning regarding the market value, volume, and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply a number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders, etc., and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, the analyst team keeps preparing a set of questionnaires, and after getting the appointee list; the target audience is then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connections that including email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey, etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Low-level Waste
  • Intermediate-level Waste
  • High-level Waste
By Form
  • Liquid
  • Solid
  • Gas

By Reactor
  • Boiling Water Reactor
  • Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
  • Gas Cooled Reactor
  • Other

By Source
  • Nuclear Power Reactors
  • Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
  • Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities
  • Research, Medical, and Industrial Source
  • Military and Defence Programs
  • Other Sources

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources
      • 3.2.2. Rising Demand Due to Growing Environmental Concerns
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Growing Risk-Related With Transportation of Nuclear Waste
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. High Installation of Pressurized Water Reactors
      • 3.4.2. Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type, Form, Reactor, Source and Region (value) (2018-2023)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Low-level Waste
        • 5.2.1.2. Intermediate-level Waste
        • 5.2.1.3. High-level Waste
      • 5.2.2. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Form (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Liquid
        • 5.2.2.2. Solid
        • 5.2.2.3. Gas
      • 5.2.3. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Reactor (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Boiling Water Reactor
        • 5.2.3.2. Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
        • 5.2.3.3. Gas Cooled Reactor
        • 5.2.3.4. Other
      • 5.2.4. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Source (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Nuclear Power Reactors
        • 5.2.4.2. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
        • 5.2.4.3. Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities
        • 5.2.4.4. Research, Medical, and Industrial Source
        • 5.2.4.5. Military and Defence Programs
        • 5.2.4.6. Other Sources
      • 5.2.5. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2023)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Fluor Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Areva SA (France)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Holtec International Inc.
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Bechtel Group Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Chase Environmental Group (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Perma-Fix Environmental Services
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Sale, by Type, Form, Reactor, Source and Region (value) (2025-2030)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Low-level Waste
        • 7.2.1.2. Intermediate-level Waste
        • 7.2.1.3. High-level Waste
      • 7.2.2. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Form (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Liquid
        • 7.2.2.2. Solid
        • 7.2.2.3. Gas
      • 7.2.3. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Reactor (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Boiling Water Reactor
        • 7.2.3.2. Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
        • 7.2.3.3. Gas Cooled Reactor
        • 7.2.3.4. Other
      • 7.2.4. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management by: Source (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Nuclear Power Reactors
        • 7.2.4.2. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
        • 7.2.4.3. Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities
        • 7.2.4.4. Research, Medical, and Industrial Source
        • 7.2.4.5. Military and Defence Programs
        • 7.2.4.6. Other Sources
      • 7.2.5. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Low-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 3. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Intermediate-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 4. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management High-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 5. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Form(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Liquid , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 7. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Solid , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 8. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Gas , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 9. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor(USD Million)
  • Table 10. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Boiling Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 11. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 12. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Gas Cooled Reactor , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 13. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Other , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 14. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Source(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Nuclear Power Reactors , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 16. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 17. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 18. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Research, Medical, and Industrial Source , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 19. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Military and Defence Programs , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 20. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Other Sources , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 21. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 22. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 23. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 24. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 25. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 26. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 27. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 28. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 29. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 30. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 31. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 32. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 33. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 43. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 44. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 45. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 46. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 47. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 48. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 49. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 50. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 51. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 52. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 53. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 54. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 55. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 56. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 57. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 58. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 60. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 62. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 63. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 64. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 65. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 66. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 68. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 70. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 71. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 72. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 73. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 74. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 75. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 76. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 77. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 78. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 79. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 80. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 81. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 82. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 83. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 84. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 85. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 86. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 87. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 91. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 95. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 97. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 99. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 100. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 101. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 102. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 103. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 104. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 105. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 106. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 107. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 108. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 109. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 110. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 111. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 112. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 113. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 114. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 115. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 116. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 117. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 118. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 119. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 120. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 121. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 122. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 123. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 124. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 125. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 126. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 127. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 128. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 129. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 140. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 141. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Low-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 142. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Intermediate-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 143. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management High-level Waste , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 144. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Form(USD Million)
  • Table 145. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Liquid , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 146. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Solid , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 147. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Gas , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 148. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor(USD Million)
  • Table 149. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Boiling Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 150. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 151. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Gas Cooled Reactor , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 152. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Other , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 153. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Source(USD Million)
  • Table 154. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Nuclear Power Reactors , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 155. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 156. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Radioactive Mining, Milling, and Extracting Activities , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 157. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Research, Medical, and Industrial Source , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 158. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Military and Defence Programs , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 159. Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Other Sources , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 160. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 161. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 162. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 163. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 164. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 165. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 166. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 167. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 168. Brazil Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 169. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 170. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 171. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 172. Argentina Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 173. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 174. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 175. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 176. Rest of South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 177. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 178. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 179. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 180. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 181. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 182. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 183. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 184. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 185. China Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 186. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 187. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 188. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 189. Japan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 190. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 191. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 192. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 193. India Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 194. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 195. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 196. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 197. South Korea Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 198. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 199. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 200. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 201. Taiwan Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 202. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 203. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 204. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 205. Australia Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 206. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 207. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 208. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 209. Rest of Asia-Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 210. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 211. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 212. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 213. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 214. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 215. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 216. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 217. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 218. Germany Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 219. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 220. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 221. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 222. France Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 223. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 224. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 225. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 226. Italy Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 227. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 228. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 229. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 230. United Kingdom Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 231. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 232. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 233. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 234. Netherlands Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 235. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 236. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 237. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 238. Rest of Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 239. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 240. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 241. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 242. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 243. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 244. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 245. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 246. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 247. Middle East Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 248. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 249. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 250. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 251. Africa Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 252. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 253. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 254. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 255. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 256. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 257. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 258. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 259. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 260. United States Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 261. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 262. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 263. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 264. Canada Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 265. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 266. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 267. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 268. Mexico Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management, by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 269. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 270. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 271. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 5. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Form USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 6. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 7. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Source USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 8. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management share by Players 2023 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management share by Players (Top 3) 2023(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management share by Players (Top 5) 2023(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. Fluor Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Fluor Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 19. Areva SA (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Areva SA (France) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 21. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 23. Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 25. Holtec International Inc. Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Holtec International Inc. Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 27. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 29. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 31. Bechtel Group Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Bechtel Group Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 33. Chase Environmental Group (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Chase Environmental Group (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 35. Perma-Fix Environmental Services Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Perma-Fix Environmental Services Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 37. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 38. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Form USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 39. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 40. Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management: by Source USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 41. South America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Fluor Corporation (United States)
  • Areva SA (France)
  • Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States)
  • Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan)
  • Holtec International Inc.
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan)
  • Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
  • Bechtel Group Inc. (United States)
  • Chase Environmental Group (United States)
  • Perma-Fix Environmental Services
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Magnox Technologies Pvt. Ltd. , Veolia Environment SA , Studsvik AB , Enercon Services Inc. , EnergySolutions , Stericycle, Inc. , Pangea Resources
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Feb 2024 240 Pages 61 Tables Base Year: 2023 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The standard version of the report profiles players such as Fluor Corporation (United States), Areva SA (France), Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States), Hitachi Zosen Corporation (Japan), Holtec International Inc., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan), Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Bechtel Group Inc. (United States), Chase Environmental Group (United States) and Perma-Fix Environmental Services etc.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
"High Installation of Pressurized Water Reactors " is seen as one of major influencing trends for Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market during projected period 2023-2030.
The Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management market study includes a random mix of players, including both market leaders and some top growing emerging players. Connect with our sales executive to get a complete company list in our research coverage.

Know More About Global Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste Management Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Retail Bags Comprehensive Study by Type (T-Shirt Bags, Paper Bags, Plastic Shopping Bag, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Re-usable Bags, Others), End User (Grocery Stores, Retail Stores, Supermarket, O...
$ 3800
Waste Processing Plants Construction Comprehensive Study by Type (Sorting and bailing plant for sorted waste, Bailing and wrapping the plant, Type shredding plant, Other), Application (Waste compacti...
$ 3800
Industrial Wastewater Treatment Equipment - Comprehensive Study by Type (Inorganic Industrial Wastewater, Organic Industrial Wastewater), Equipment (Trash Rakes, Filters, Centrifuges, Others), Proces...
$ 3500
E- Waste Recycle and Reuse Services Comprehensive Study by Industry Vertical (IT and Telecom, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer Electronics, Others), Material Type (Metals and chemicals, Plastics, Gla...
$ 3800
Industrial Water Market Comprehensive Study by Treatment (Oil & Grease Removal (Gravity Separation and Skimming, Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF), Others), Solids Removal (Sedimentation Techniques, Flo...
$ 3800
Recycled Ocean Plastics Comprehensive Study by Application (Plastic, Textile, Construction, Electronic, Others), Dimension Type (Microplastic, Mesoplastic), Source Type (Plastic Bottles, Plastic Bag,...
$ 3800