Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Market research
Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Market research

Marine Hybrid Propulsion Comprehensive Study by Type (Diesel-Electric, Parallel Electric, Serial Hybrid), Power Rating (0 To 300 KW, 301 To 500 KW, 501 To 800 kW, Above 801 kW), Stroke (Two Stroke, Four Stroke), End User (Tugboats, Offshore Support Vessels, Ferries, Defense Vessels, Yacht, Cruise Ships, Others) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2024

Marine Hybrid Propulsion Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2019- 2024  

May 2019 Edition 222 Pages 200 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Market Overview:
Mechanic and electric power work together in the propulsion train, optimizing the propulsion efficiency for ships through a flexible power demand. A mixture of electrical power delivered by electrical motors coupled with mechanical power which is provided by diesel engines delivers propulsion power, which ensures the ship a broad operational capability. Hence, it provide the right amount of power and torque to the propeller in each operation method. However, a diesel-mechanic propulsion system is often designed according to its maximum power demand. Some of the key players profiled in the study are Cummins Inc. (United States), AB Volvo Penta (Sweden), General Electric (United States), Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom), Nigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Japan), Fairbanks Morse Engine (United States), Caterpillar Inc. (United States), BAE Systems plc (United Kingdom), Wartsila Corporation (Finland) and MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (Germany).

On the basis of geography, the market of Marine Hybrid Propulsion has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Power Rating, the sub-segment i.e. 0 To 300 KW will boost the Marine Hybrid Propulsion market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Stroke, the sub-segment i.e. Two Stroke will boost the Marine Hybrid Propulsion market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by End User, the sub-segment i.e. Tugboats will boost the Marine Hybrid Propulsion market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • High Growth in Sales and Production of Ships across the World
  • Rising International Seaborne Trade

Market Trend
  • Increasing Usage of Inland Waterways Along With Technological Advancements

Restraints
  • Huge Capital Investments Needed To Install New Manufacturing Facilities

Opportunities
  • Rising Need of Resources Such As Coal, Crude Oil, Iron, and Steel from Emerging Economies

Challenges
  • Stringent Environmental Regulations & Rules


Major Market Developments:


On Feb 18, 2019 - MAN Energy Solutions unveiled its new TCT turbocharger series. Axial TCT series specifically optimised for Tier III operation, suitable for both conventional and dual-fueled, two- and four-stroke engines.

Target Audience:
Manufacturers of Marine Hybrid Propulsion, Suppliers of Marine Hybrid Propulsion Parts, Distributors of Marine Hybrid Propulsion, Marine Industry, Governmental Bodies and Research Firms

Major Objectives Focused through this Study
• To define, describe, and forecast the Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion market on the basis of product [Diesel-Electric, Parallel Electric and Serial Hybrid] , application [], key regions and end user
• To provide in-depth information regarding major influencing factors affecting the growth of the market (trends, drivers, restraints, opportunities, and industry-centric and regional challenges)
• To strategically analyse the micro-markets and important business segments with respect to individual growth drivers , market trends and potential, and historical contributions to the total market
• Identifying the opportunities in the market for key stakeholders and detailing the competitive landscape for market leaders
• To provide market size for various segments of the Marine Hybrid Propulsion market with respect to major geographies, namely, South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico)
• To strategically profile the key players and analyzing their market shares and core competencies in the Marine Hybrid Propulsion industry
• To track key developments such as product launches, expansions, agreements, partnerships, mergers & acquisitions, and R&D activities that are key factors in shaping the market

Available Customization:
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research are Steyr Motors GmbH (Austria), Torqeedo GmbH (Germany), Masson-Marine S.A.S (France) and Schottel Group (Germany).
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase

While framing the research framework, major and emerging players operating in the Marine Hybrid Propulsion market in various regions have been profiled, and their offerings, geographic footprints, and distribution/sales channels have been analysed through in-depth discussions. Top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to determine the overall market size. Sizes of the other individual markets have been estimated using the percentage splits obtained through secondary sources such as Hoovers, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, and Dow Jones (Factiva), along with primary respondents. The complete methodology includes the study of the annual and financial reports of the key market players and extensive interviews with industry experts such as CEOs, VPs, directors, and marketing executives for key insights (both qualitative and quantitative) related to the market.
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Diesel-Electric
  • Parallel Electric
  • Serial Hybrid
By Power Rating
  • 0 To 300 KW
  • 301 To 500 KW
  • 501 To 800 kW
  • Above 801 kW

By Stroke
  • Two Stroke
  • Four Stroke

By End User
  • Tugboats
  • Offshore Support Vessels
  • Ferries
  • Defense Vessels
  • Yacht
  • Cruise Ships
  • Others

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. High Growth in Sales and Production of Ships across the World
      • 3.2.2. Rising International Seaborne Trade
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Stringent Environmental Regulations & Rules
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Usage of Inland Waterways Along With Technological Advancements
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type, Power Rating, Stroke, End User and Region (value, volume and price ) (2013-2018)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Diesel-Electric
        • 5.2.1.2. Parallel Electric
        • 5.2.1.3. Serial Hybrid
      • 5.2.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Power Rating (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. 0 To 300 KW
        • 5.2.2.2. 301 To 500 KW
        • 5.2.2.3. 501 To 800 kW
        • 5.2.2.4. Above 801 kW
      • 5.2.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Stroke (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Two Stroke
        • 5.2.3.2. Four Stroke
      • 5.2.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: End User (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Tugboats
        • 5.2.4.2. Offshore Support Vessels
        • 5.2.4.3. Ferries
        • 5.2.4.4. Defense Vessels
        • 5.2.4.5. Yacht
        • 5.2.4.6. Cruise Ships
        • 5.2.4.7. Others
      • 5.2.5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Volume)
      • 5.3.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Volume)
        • 5.3.1.1. Diesel-Electric
        • 5.3.1.2. Parallel Electric
        • 5.3.1.3. Serial Hybrid
      • 5.3.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Power Rating (Volume)
        • 5.3.2.1. 0 To 300 KW
        • 5.3.2.2. 301 To 500 KW
        • 5.3.2.3. 501 To 800 kW
        • 5.3.2.4. Above 801 kW
      • 5.3.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Stroke (Volume)
        • 5.3.3.1. Two Stroke
        • 5.3.3.2. Four Stroke
      • 5.3.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: End User (Volume)
        • 5.3.4.1. Tugboats
        • 5.3.4.2. Offshore Support Vessels
        • 5.3.4.3. Ferries
        • 5.3.4.4. Defense Vessels
        • 5.3.4.5. Yacht
        • 5.3.4.6. Cruise Ships
        • 5.3.4.7. Others
      • 5.3.5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Region
        • 5.3.5.1. South America
          • 5.3.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.3.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.3.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.3.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.3.5.2.1. China
          • 5.3.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.3.5.2.3. India
          • 5.3.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.3.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.3.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.3.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.3.5.3. Europe
          • 5.3.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.3.5.3.2. France
          • 5.3.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.3.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.3.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.3.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.3.5.4. MEA
          • 5.3.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.3.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.3.5.5. North America
          • 5.3.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.3.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.3.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Price)
      • 5.4.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2018)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Cummins Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. AB Volvo Penta (Sweden)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. General Electric (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Nigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Japan)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Fairbanks Morse Engine (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Caterpillar Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. BAE Systems plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Wartsila Corporation (Finland)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (Germany)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sale, by Type, Power Rating, Stroke, End User and Region (value, volume and price ) (2019-2024)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Diesel-Electric
        • 7.2.1.2. Parallel Electric
        • 7.2.1.3. Serial Hybrid
      • 7.2.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Power Rating (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. 0 To 300 KW
        • 7.2.2.2. 301 To 500 KW
        • 7.2.2.3. 501 To 800 kW
        • 7.2.2.4. Above 801 kW
      • 7.2.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Stroke (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Two Stroke
        • 7.2.3.2. Four Stroke
      • 7.2.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: End User (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Tugboats
        • 7.2.4.2. Offshore Support Vessels
        • 7.2.4.3. Ferries
        • 7.2.4.4. Defense Vessels
        • 7.2.4.5. Yacht
        • 7.2.4.6. Cruise Ships
        • 7.2.4.7. Others
      • 7.2.5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Volume)
      • 7.3.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Volume)
        • 7.3.1.1. Diesel-Electric
        • 7.3.1.2. Parallel Electric
        • 7.3.1.3. Serial Hybrid
      • 7.3.2. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Power Rating (Volume)
        • 7.3.2.1. 0 To 300 KW
        • 7.3.2.2. 301 To 500 KW
        • 7.3.2.3. 501 To 800 kW
        • 7.3.2.4. Above 801 kW
      • 7.3.3. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Stroke (Volume)
        • 7.3.3.1. Two Stroke
        • 7.3.3.2. Four Stroke
      • 7.3.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: End User (Volume)
        • 7.3.4.1. Tugboats
        • 7.3.4.2. Offshore Support Vessels
        • 7.3.4.3. Ferries
        • 7.3.4.4. Defense Vessels
        • 7.3.4.5. Yacht
        • 7.3.4.6. Cruise Ships
        • 7.3.4.7. Others
      • 7.3.5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion Region
        • 7.3.5.1. South America
          • 7.3.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.3.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.3.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.3.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.3.5.2.1. China
          • 7.3.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.3.5.2.3. India
          • 7.3.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.3.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.3.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.3.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.3.5.3. Europe
          • 7.3.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.3.5.3.2. France
          • 7.3.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.3.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.3.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.3.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.3.5.4. MEA
          • 7.3.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.3.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.3.5.5. North America
          • 7.3.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.3.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.3.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion (Price)
      • 7.4.1. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Diesel-Electric , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 3. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Parallel Electric , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 4. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Serial Hybrid , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 5. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 0 To 300 KW , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 7. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 301 To 500 KW , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 8. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 501 To 800 kW , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 9. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Above 801 kW , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 10. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke(USD Million)
  • Table 11. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Two Stroke , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 12. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Four Stroke , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 13. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 14. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Tugboats , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 15. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Offshore Support Vessels , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 16. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Ferries , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 17. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Defense Vessels , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 18. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Yacht , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 19. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Cruise Ships , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 20. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Others , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 21. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 22. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 23. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 24. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 25. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 26. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 27. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 28. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 29. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 30. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 31. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 32. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 33. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 43. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 44. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 45. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 46. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 47. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 48. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 49. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 50. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 51. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 52. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 53. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 54. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 55. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 56. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 57. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 58. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 60. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 62. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 63. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 64. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 65. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 66. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 68. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 70. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 71. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 72. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 73. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 74. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 75. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 76. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 77. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 78. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 79. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 80. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 81. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 82. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 83. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 84. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 85. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 86. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 87. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 91. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 95. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 97. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 99. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 100. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 101. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 102. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 103. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 104. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 105. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 106. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 107. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 108. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 109. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 110. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 111. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 112. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 113. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 114. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 115. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 116. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 117. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 118. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 119. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 120. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 121. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 122. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 123. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 124. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 125. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 126. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 127. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 128. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 129. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 130. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Type(K Units)
  • Table 131. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Diesel-Electric , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 132. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Parallel Electric , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 133. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Serial Hybrid , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 134. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Power Rating(K Units)
  • Table 135. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 0 To 300 KW , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 136. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 301 To 500 KW , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 137. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 501 To 800 kW , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 138. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Above 801 kW , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 139. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Stroke(K Units)
  • Table 140. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Two Stroke , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 141. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Four Stroke , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 142. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by End User(K Units)
  • Table 143. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Tugboats , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 144. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Offshore Support Vessels , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 145. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Ferries , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 146. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Defense Vessels , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 147. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Yacht , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 148. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Cruise Ships , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 149. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Others , by Region K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 150. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 151. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 152. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 153. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 154. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 155. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 156. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 157. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 158. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 159. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 160. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 161. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 162. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 163. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 164. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 165. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 166. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 167. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 168. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 169. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 170. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 171. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 172. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 173. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 174. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 175. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 176. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 177. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 178. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 179. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 180. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 181. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 182. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 183. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 184. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 185. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 186. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 187. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 188. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 189. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 190. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 191. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 192. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 193. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 194. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 195. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 196. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 197. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 198. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 199. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 200. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 201. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 202. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 203. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 204. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 205. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 206. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 207. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 208. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 209. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 210. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 211. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 212. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 213. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 214. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 215. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 216. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 217. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 218. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 219. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 220. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 221. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 222. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 223. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 224. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 225. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 226. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 227. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 228. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 229. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 230. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 231. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 232. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 233. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 234. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 235. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 236. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 237. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 238. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 239. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 240. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 241. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 242. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 243. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 244. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 245. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 246. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 247. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 248. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 249. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 250. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 251. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 252. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 253. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 254. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 255. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 256. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 257. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 258. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Table 259. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 260. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 261. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 262. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 263. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 264. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 265. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 266. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 267. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 268. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 269. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 270. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 271. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Diesel-Electric , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 272. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Parallel Electric , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 273. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Serial Hybrid , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 274. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating(USD Million)
  • Table 275. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 0 To 300 KW , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 276. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 301 To 500 KW , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 277. Marine Hybrid Propulsion 501 To 800 kW , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 278. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Above 801 kW , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 279. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke(USD Million)
  • Table 280. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Two Stroke , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 281. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Four Stroke , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 282. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 283. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Tugboats , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 284. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Offshore Support Vessels , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 285. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Ferries , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 286. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Defense Vessels , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 287. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Yacht , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 288. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Cruise Ships , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 289. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Others , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 290. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 291. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 292. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 293. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 294. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 295. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 296. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 297. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 298. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 299. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 300. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 301. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 302. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 303. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 304. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 305. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 306. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 307. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 308. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 309. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 310. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 311. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 312. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 313. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 314. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 315. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 316. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 317. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 318. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 319. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 320. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 321. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 322. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 323. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 324. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 325. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 326. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 327. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 328. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 329. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 330. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 331. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 332. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 333. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 334. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 335. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 336. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 337. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 338. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 339. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 340. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 341. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 342. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 343. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 344. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 345. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 346. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 347. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 348. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 349. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 350. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 351. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 352. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 353. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 354. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 355. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 356. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 357. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 358. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 359. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 360. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 361. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 362. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 363. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 364. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 365. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 366. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 367. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 368. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 369. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 370. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 371. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 372. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 373. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 374. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 375. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 376. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 377. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 378. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 379. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 380. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 381. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 382. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 383. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 384. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 385. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 386. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 387. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 388. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 389. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 390. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 391. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 392. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 393. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 394. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 395. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 396. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 397. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 398. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion, by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 399. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Type(K Units)
  • Table 400. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Diesel-Electric , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 401. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Parallel Electric , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 402. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Serial Hybrid , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 403. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Power Rating(K Units)
  • Table 404. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 0 To 300 KW , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 405. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 301 To 500 KW , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 406. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales 501 To 800 kW , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 407. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Above 801 kW , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 408. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by Stroke(K Units)
  • Table 409. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Two Stroke , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 410. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Four Stroke , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 411. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales: by End User(K Units)
  • Table 412. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Tugboats , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 413. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Offshore Support Vessels , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 414. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Ferries , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 415. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Defense Vessels , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 416. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Yacht , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 417. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Cruise Ships , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 418. Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales Others , by Region K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 419. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 420. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 421. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 422. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 423. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 424. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 425. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 426. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 427. Brazil Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 428. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 429. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 430. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 431. Argentina Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 432. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 433. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 434. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 435. Rest of South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 436. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 437. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 438. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 439. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 440. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 441. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 442. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 443. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 444. China Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 445. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 446. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 447. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 448. Japan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 449. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 450. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 451. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 452. India Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 453. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 454. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 455. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 456. South Korea Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 457. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 458. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 459. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 460. Taiwan Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 461. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 462. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 463. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 464. Australia Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 465. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 466. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 467. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 468. Rest of Asia-Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 469. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 470. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 471. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 472. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 473. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 474. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 475. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 476. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 477. Germany Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 478. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 479. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 480. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 481. France Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 482. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 483. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 484. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 485. Italy Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 486. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 487. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 488. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 489. United Kingdom Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 490. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 491. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 492. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 493. Netherlands Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 494. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 495. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 496. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 497. Rest of Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 498. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 499. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 500. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 501. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 502. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 503. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 504. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 505. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 506. Middle East Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 507. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 508. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 509. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 510. Africa Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 511. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Country K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 512. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 513. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 514. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 515. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 516. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 517. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 518. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 519. United States Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 520. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 521. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 522. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 523. Canada Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 524. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 525. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 526. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 527. Mexico Marine Hybrid Propulsion Sales, by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Table 528. Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 529. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 530. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 531. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 5. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 6. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 7. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 8. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type K Units (2013-2018)
  • Figure 14. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating K Units (2013-2018)
  • Figure 15. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke K Units (2013-2018)
  • Figure 16. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User K Units (2013-2018)
  • Figure 17. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 18. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 19. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 20. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 21. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 22. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type USD/Units (2013-2018)
  • Figure 23. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion share by Players 2018 (%)
  • Figure 24. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion share by Players (Top 3) 2018(%)
  • Figure 25. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion share by Players (Top 5) 2018(%)
  • Figure 26. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 27. Cummins Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Cummins Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 29. AB Volvo Penta (Sweden) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. AB Volvo Penta (Sweden) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 31. General Electric (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. General Electric (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 33. Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 35. Nigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Nigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 37. Fairbanks Morse Engine (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 38. Fairbanks Morse Engine (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 39. Caterpillar Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 40. Caterpillar Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 41. BAE Systems plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 42. BAE Systems plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 43. Wartsila Corporation (Finland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 44. Wartsila Corporation (Finland) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 45. MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 46. MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 47. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 48. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 49. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 50. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 51. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 52. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 53. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 54. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 55. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 56. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type K Units (2019-2024)
  • Figure 57. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Power Rating K Units (2019-2024)
  • Figure 58. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Stroke K Units (2019-2024)
  • Figure 59. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by End User K Units (2019-2024)
  • Figure 60. South America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 61. Asia Pacific Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 62. Europe Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 63. MEA Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 64. North America Marine Hybrid Propulsion Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 65. Global Marine Hybrid Propulsion: by Type USD/Units (2019-2024)
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Cummins Inc. (United States)
  • AB Volvo Penta (Sweden)
  • General Electric (United States)
  • Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom)
  • Nigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Japan)
  • Fairbanks Morse Engine (United States)
  • Caterpillar Inc. (United States)
  • BAE Systems plc (United Kingdom)
  • Wartsila Corporation (Finland)
  • MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (Germany)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Steyr Motors GmbH (Austria) , Torqeedo GmbH (Germany) , Masson-Marine S.A.S (France) , Schottel Group (Germany)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation