Construction Waste Processing Comprehensive Study by Type (Excavation Wastes (Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others), Roadwork Waste ( Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast), Demolition Waste (Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum), Complex waste (Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton)), Application (Municipal Engineering, Construction, Other), Waste Type (Inert, Wood, Cardboard, Plastic, Glass, Metal, Others), Service Type (Collection, Recycling, Landfill, Incineration) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Construction Waste Processing Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
What is Construction Waste Processing Market?

The increasing population worldwide coupled with rising construction activities will help to boost the global Construction Waste Processing market in the forecasted period. Construction waste is anything that is generated as a result of construction and then abandoned, regardless of whether it has been processed or stockpiled. The growing environmental awareness, rapid industrialization, surge in populations foster the growth of the global Construction Waste Processing market. Additionally, the implementation of stringent government regulations will help to trigger the global market.

The market study is being classified by Type (Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others], Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast], Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum] and complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton]), by Application (Municipal Engineering, Construction and Other) and major geographies with country level break-up.

Enviro Serve (India), Progressive Waste Solution (Canada), Republic Service (United States), Clean Harbor (United States), Daiseki (Japan), Gamma Waste Systems (United States), CDE global (Ireland), Siltbuster Ltd (United States), Bre Global (United Kingdom) and TradeBe (United Kingdom) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research are IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Limited (India) and Remondis (India).

Leading key players are focusing on strategic partnerships to improve their services for waste management. Companies are focusing on increasing their client base to strengthen market position and to enhance product & service offerings. Also, it focuses on developing new technologies for waste management. Research Analyst at AMA predicts that European Manufacturers will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Construction Waste Processing market throughout the predicted period.

Segment Analysis
Analyst at AMA have segmented the market study of Global Construction Waste Processing market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Construction Waste Processing has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Growing Construction Activities Worldwide
  • High Demand due to Rapid Urbanization, Growing Population, and the Influx of Tourists

Market Trend
  • Increasing Government Regulations and Norms Regarding Waste Processing
  • Growing Environmental Awareness among The People

Restraints
  • Rising Concerns Regarding Lack of Standardization and Low Margins

Opportunities
  • Growing Sustainable and Green Buiding Technology
  • Upsurging Demand from Emerging Markets due to Increasing Awareness


Market Leaders and some development strategies
On 14th August 2019, Australian mining company Centrex Metals has partnered with CDE Meta to deliver a state-of-the-art wet processing plant, currently under installation at the company’s Ardmore site, that will produce phosphate concentrate.



Key Target Audience
Construction Waste Processing Service Providers, Government Regulatory Bodies, Government Research Organizations, Private Research Organizations and Others

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others]
  • Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast]
  • Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum]
  • complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton]
By Application
  • Municipal Engineering
  • Construction
  • Other
By Waste Type
  • Inert
  • Wood
  • Cardboard
  • Plastic
  • Glass
  • Metal
  • Others

By Service Type
  • Collection
  • Recycling
  • Landfill
  • Incineration

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing Construction Activities Worldwide
      • 3.2.2. High Demand due to Rapid Urbanization, Growing Population, and the Influx of Tourists
    • 3.3. Market Trends
      • 3.3.1. Increasing Government Regulations and Norms Regarding Waste Processing
      • 3.3.2. Growing Environmental Awareness among The People
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Construction Waste Processing, by Type, Application, Waste Type, Service Type and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Construction Waste Processing (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others]
        • 5.2.1.2. Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast]
        • 5.2.1.3. Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum]
        • 5.2.1.4. Complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton]
      • 5.2.2. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Municipal Engineering
        • 5.2.2.2. Construction
        • 5.2.2.3. Other
      • 5.2.3. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Waste Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Inert
        • 5.2.3.2. Wood
        • 5.2.3.3. Cardboard
        • 5.2.3.4. Plastic
        • 5.2.3.5. Glass
        • 5.2.3.6. Metal
        • 5.2.3.7. Others
      • 5.2.4. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Service Type (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Collection
        • 5.2.4.2. Recycling
        • 5.2.4.3. Landfill
        • 5.2.4.4. Incineration
      • 5.2.5. Global Construction Waste Processing Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Construction Waste Processing (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Construction Waste Processing: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Enviro Serve (India)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Progressive Waste Solution (Canada)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Republic Service (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Clean Harbor (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Daiseki (Japan)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Gamma Waste Systems (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. CDE global (Ireland)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Siltbuster Ltd (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Bre Global (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. TradeBe (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Construction Waste Processing Sale, by Type, Application, Waste Type, Service Type and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Construction Waste Processing (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others]
        • 7.2.1.2. Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast]
        • 7.2.1.3. Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum]
        • 7.2.1.4. Complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton]
      • 7.2.2. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Municipal Engineering
        • 7.2.2.2. Construction
        • 7.2.2.3. Other
      • 7.2.3. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Waste Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Inert
        • 7.2.3.2. Wood
        • 7.2.3.3. Cardboard
        • 7.2.3.4. Plastic
        • 7.2.3.5. Glass
        • 7.2.3.6. Metal
        • 7.2.3.7. Others
      • 7.2.4. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Service Type (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Collection
        • 7.2.4.2. Recycling
        • 7.2.4.3. Landfill
        • 7.2.4.4. Incineration
      • 7.2.5. Global Construction Waste Processing Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Construction Waste Processing (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Construction Waste Processing by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Construction Waste Processing: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Construction Waste Processing Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Construction Waste Processing Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Construction Waste Processing Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Construction Waste Processing Complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton] , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Construction Waste Processing: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Construction Waste Processing Municipal Engineering , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Construction Waste Processing Construction , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Construction Waste Processing Other , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Construction Waste Processing: by Waste Type(USD Million)
  • Table 11. Construction Waste Processing Inert , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Construction Waste Processing Wood , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Construction Waste Processing Cardboard , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Construction Waste Processing Plastic , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Construction Waste Processing Glass , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Construction Waste Processing Metal , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. Construction Waste Processing Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Construction Waste Processing: by Service Type(USD Million)
  • Table 19. Construction Waste Processing Collection , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Construction Waste Processing Recycling , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Construction Waste Processing Landfill , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Construction Waste Processing Incineration , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. China Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. China Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. China Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. China Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. India Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. India Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. India Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. India Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. France Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. France Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. France Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. France Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 131. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 132. Construction Waste Processing: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 140. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 141. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 142. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 143. Construction Waste Processing: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 144. Construction Waste Processing Excavation Wastes [Vegetable Soil, Gravel, Rock, Clay, Others] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Construction Waste Processing Roadwork Waste [ Concrete, Broken Asphalt, Paving Stone, Sand, Pebble, Railway Traverse, Ballast] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Construction Waste Processing Demolition Waste [Concrete with Iron, Concrete without Iron, Roofing, Tiles, Bricks, Wood, Stucco, Gypsum] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Construction Waste Processing Complex waste [Plastics, Metals, Ceramic, Paper, Carton] , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Construction Waste Processing: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 149. Construction Waste Processing Municipal Engineering , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Construction Waste Processing Construction , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Construction Waste Processing Other , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Construction Waste Processing: by Waste Type(USD Million)
  • Table 153. Construction Waste Processing Inert , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Construction Waste Processing Wood , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Construction Waste Processing Cardboard , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Construction Waste Processing Plastic , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Construction Waste Processing Glass , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Construction Waste Processing Metal , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Construction Waste Processing Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Construction Waste Processing: by Service Type(USD Million)
  • Table 161. Construction Waste Processing Collection , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Construction Waste Processing Recycling , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Construction Waste Processing Landfill , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Construction Waste Processing Incineration , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. South America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Brazil Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Argentina Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Rest of South America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. China Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. China Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. China Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. China Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Japan Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. India Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. India Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. India Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. India Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. South Korea Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Taiwan Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Australia Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Rest of Asia-Pacific Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Germany Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. France Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. France Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. France Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. France Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Italy Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. United Kingdom Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. Netherlands Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Rest of Europe Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. MEA Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. Middle East Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. Africa Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. North America Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. United States Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 269. Canada Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 270. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 271. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 272. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 273. Mexico Construction Waste Processing, by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 274. Construction Waste Processing: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 275. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 276. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 277. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Waste Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Service Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Type USD/Units (2015-2020)
  • Figure 14. Global Construction Waste Processing share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Construction Waste Processing share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Construction Waste Processing share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. Enviro Serve (India) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Enviro Serve (India) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Progressive Waste Solution (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Progressive Waste Solution (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Republic Service (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Republic Service (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Clean Harbor (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Clean Harbor (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. Daiseki (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Daiseki (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Gamma Waste Systems (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Gamma Waste Systems (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. CDE global (Ireland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. CDE global (Ireland) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Siltbuster Ltd (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Siltbuster Ltd (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. Bre Global (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Bre Global (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. TradeBe (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. TradeBe (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Waste Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Service Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 42. South America Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Asia Pacific Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. Europe Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. MEA Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. North America Construction Waste Processing Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. Global Construction Waste Processing: by Type USD/Units (2021-2026)
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Enviro Serve (India)
  • Progressive Waste Solution (Canada)
  • Republic Service (United States)
  • Clean Harbor (United States)
  • Daiseki (Japan)
  • Gamma Waste Systems (United States)
  • CDE global (Ireland)
  • Siltbuster Ltd (United States)
  • Bre Global (United Kingdom)
  • TradeBe (United Kingdom)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Limited (India) , Remondis (India)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Sep 2021 213 Pages 73 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

"Growing Construction Activities Worldwide " is seen as one of major growth factors of Construction Waste Processing Market in years to come.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
European will lead Construction Waste Processing Market in coming years.

Know More About Global and China Construction Waste Processing Report?