Blockchain technology in Healthcare Comprehensive Study by Type (Private Blockchain, Public Blockchain, Consortium Blockchain), End User (Healthcare Payers, Healthcare Providers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Other End Users) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2028

Blockchain technology in Healthcare Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2023-2028  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
The transformation of healthcare delivery has led to the evolution of the concept of patient-centricity or participatory approach to healthcare delivery. Every healthcare industry organization, irrespective of whether it is a provider or payer, understands that there is this only way to keep itself in contention is to provide its members with a best-of-class experience in care delivery at a low cost. Rising demand for healthcare services and integrated delivery, coupled with an increased focus on member health management emphasizes the need for an information technology system. Here blockchain can be useful as it doesn’t require multiple-level authentication and at the same time, it gives complete on-demand access to chronologically arranged data. This robust technology can drive healthcare industry performance with improved quality at low cost.This growth is primarily driven by Rise in Counterfeit Drugs in the Market .

AttributesDetails
Study Period2018-2028
Base Year2022
Forecast Period2023-2028
Volume UnitN
Value UnitUSD (Million)
Customization ScopeAvail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility


The Health Care Technology sector in the region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Players, such as IBM (United States), Microsoft (United States), Pokitdok Inc. (United States), Guardtime (Netherlands), Hashed Health (United States), Chronicled Inc. (United States), Patientory Inc. (United States), PokitDok (United States) and SimplyVital Health (United States), etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Key Developments in the Market:
In April 2018, SimplyVital Health, Inc. announced a partnership with Shivom Ventures Limited to form Global Healthcare Blockchain Alliance. The strategic partnership aimed at supporting the organization to develop technologically advanced products in the blockchain industry, thereby strengthening its foothold in the market.
In 2018, Microsoft and Viant along with GSK formed a consortium named Viant Blockchain Programme aimed to speed the adoption of a supply chain powered by blockchain across a variety of industries, including the healthcare sector.The companies are exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new product launches, and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are exploring new geographies through expansions and acquisitions to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies.

Influencing Trend:
Technology Advancement and Innovation in Blockchain Technology in Healthcare

Market Growth Drivers:
Rise in Counterfeit Drugs in the Market, Low Cost of Maintenance and Growing Requirement to Store and Secure Medical Data

Challenges:
Lack of Awareness about Blockchain Technology in Healthcare and Its Understanding and Balancing Data-Sharing Capability with Privacy Concerns

Restraints:
Lack of a Central Entity and Common Set of Standards

Opportunities:
Personalized Healthcare, Pharmaceutical Research and Precision Medicines and Government Initiatives in Various Countries for Blockchain Technology

AMA Research follows a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mainly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcases the spontaneously changing Players landscape impacting the market's growth. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyze the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Data Sources of Blockchain technology in Healthcare Market Study

Primary Collection: InMail, LinkedIn Groups, Survey Monkey, Google, and Other professional Forums are some of the mediums utilized to gather primary data through key industry participants and appointees, subject-matter experts, C-level executives of Blockchain technology in Healthcare Industry, among others including independent industry consultants, experts, to obtain and verify critical qualitative commentary and opinion and quantitative statistics, to assess future market prospects.

The primary interviews and data collected as per the below protocols:
• By Designation: C-Level, D-Level, Others
• By Company Type: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3

Secondary Data Sources such as Annual reports, Press releases, Analyst meetings, Conference calls, Investor presentations, Management statements, and SEC filings of Blockchain technology in Healthcare players along with Regulatory Sites, Association, World bank, etc were used as sources secondary set of data.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts but also includes significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Blockchain technology in Healthcare Study Sheds Light on
— The Blockchain technology in Healthcare Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analysts at AMA organize and took surveys of the Blockchain technology in Healthcare industry Players. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Blockchain technology in Healthcare industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, surveys, and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Players can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold the value they currently claim or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Private Blockchain
  • Public Blockchain
  • Consortium Blockchain
By End User
  • Healthcare Payers
  • Healthcare Providers
  • Pharmaceutical Companies
  • Other End Users

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Rise in Counterfeit Drugs in the Market
      • 3.2.2. Low Cost of Maintenance
      • 3.2.3. Growing Requirement to Store and Secure Medical Data
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Awareness about Blockchain Technology in Healthcare and Its Understanding
      • 3.3.2. Balancing Data-Sharing Capability with Privacy Concerns
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Technology Advancement and Innovation in Blockchain Technology in Healthcare
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type, End User and Region (value and price ) (2017-2022)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Private Blockchain
        • 5.2.1.2. Public Blockchain
        • 5.2.1.3. Consortium Blockchain
      • 5.2.2. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: End User (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Healthcare Payers
        • 5.2.2.2. Healthcare Providers
        • 5.2.2.3. Pharmaceutical Companies
        • 5.2.2.4. Other End Users
      • 5.2.3. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare Region
        • 5.2.3.1. South America
          • 5.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.3.2.1. China
          • 5.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.3.2.3. India
          • 5.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.3.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.3.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.3.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.3.3. Europe
          • 5.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.3.3.2. France
          • 5.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.3.4. MEA
          • 5.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.3.5. North America
          • 5.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.3.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2022)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. IBM (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Microsoft (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Pokitdok Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Guardtime (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Hashed Health (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Chronicled Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Patientory Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. PokitDok (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. SimplyVital Health (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare Sale, by Type, End User and Region (value and price ) (2023-2028)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Private Blockchain
        • 7.2.1.2. Public Blockchain
        • 7.2.1.3. Consortium Blockchain
      • 7.2.2. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: End User (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Healthcare Payers
        • 7.2.2.2. Healthcare Providers
        • 7.2.2.3. Pharmaceutical Companies
        • 7.2.2.4. Other End Users
      • 7.2.3. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare Region
        • 7.2.3.1. South America
          • 7.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.3.2.1. China
          • 7.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.3.2.3. India
          • 7.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.3.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.3.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.3.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.3.3. Europe
          • 7.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.3.3.2. France
          • 7.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.3.4. MEA
          • 7.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.3.5. North America
          • 7.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.3.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Private Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 3. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Public Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 4. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Consortium Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 5. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Healthcare Payers , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 7. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Healthcare Providers , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 8. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Pharmaceutical Companies , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 9. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Other End Users , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 10. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 11. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 12. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 13. Brazil Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 14. Brazil Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 15. Argentina Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 16. Argentina Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 17. Rest of South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 18. Rest of South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 19. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 20. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 21. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 22. China Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 23. China Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 24. Japan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 25. Japan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 26. India Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 27. India Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 28. South Korea Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 29. South Korea Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 30. Taiwan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 31. Taiwan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 32. Australia Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 33. Australia Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 34. Rest of Asia-Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 35. Rest of Asia-Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 36. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 37. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 38. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 39. Germany Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 40. Germany Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 41. France Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 42. France Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 43. Italy Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 44. Italy Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 45. United Kingdom Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 46. United Kingdom Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 47. Netherlands Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 48. Netherlands Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 49. Rest of Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 50. Rest of Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 51. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 52. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 53. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 54. Middle East Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 55. Middle East Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 56. Africa Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 57. Africa Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 58. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 59. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 60. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 61. United States Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 62. United States Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 63. Canada Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 64. Canada Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 65. Mexico Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 66. Mexico Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 67. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 68. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 69. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 70. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 71. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 72. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 73. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 74. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 75. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 76. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 77. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 78. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Private Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 79. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Public Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 80. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Consortium Blockchain , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 81. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 82. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Healthcare Payers , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 83. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Healthcare Providers , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 84. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Pharmaceutical Companies , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 85. Blockchain technology in Healthcare Other End Users , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 86. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 87. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 88. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 89. Brazil Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 90. Brazil Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 91. Argentina Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 92. Argentina Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 93. Rest of South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 94. Rest of South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 95. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 96. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 97. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 98. China Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 99. China Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 100. Japan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 101. Japan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 102. India Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 103. India Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 104. South Korea Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 105. South Korea Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 106. Taiwan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 107. Taiwan Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 108. Australia Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 109. Australia Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 110. Rest of Asia-Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 111. Rest of Asia-Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 112. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 113. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 114. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 115. Germany Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 116. Germany Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 117. France Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 118. France Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 119. Italy Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 120. Italy Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 121. United Kingdom Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 122. United Kingdom Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 123. Netherlands Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 124. Netherlands Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 125. Rest of Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 126. Rest of Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 127. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 128. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 129. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 130. Middle East Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 131. Middle East Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 132. Africa Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 133. Africa Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 134. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 135. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 136. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 137. United States Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 138. United States Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 139. Canada Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 140. Canada Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 141. Mexico Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 142. Mexico Blockchain technology in Healthcare, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 143. Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 144. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 145. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 146. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 5. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 6. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 7. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type USD/Units (2017-2022)
  • Figure 12. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare share by Players 2022 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare share by Players (Top 3) 2022(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare share by Players (Top 5) 2022(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. IBM (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. IBM (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 18. Microsoft (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Microsoft (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 20. Pokitdok Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Pokitdok Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 22. Guardtime (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Guardtime (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 24. Hashed Health (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Hashed Health (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 26. Chronicled Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Chronicled Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 28. Patientory Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Patientory Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 30. PokitDok (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. PokitDok (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 32. SimplyVital Health (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. SimplyVital Health (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 34. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 35. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 36. South America Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 37. Asia Pacific Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. Europe Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 39. MEA Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. North America Blockchain technology in Healthcare Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare: by Type USD/Units (2023-2028)
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • IBM (United States)
  • Microsoft (United States)
  • Pokitdok Inc. (United States)
  • Guardtime (Netherlands)
  • Hashed Health (United States)
  • Chronicled Inc. (United States)
  • Patientory Inc. (United States)
  • PokitDok (United States)
  • SimplyVital Health (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jun 2023 237 Pages 90 Tables Base Year: 2022 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2018-2022; Base year: 2022; Forecast period: 2023 to 2028
Companies that are profiled in Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare Market are IBM (United States), Microsoft (United States), Pokitdok Inc. (United States), Guardtime (Netherlands), Hashed Health (United States), Chronicled Inc. (United States), Patientory Inc. (United States), PokitDok (United States) and SimplyVital Health (United States) etc.
AMA Research predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare market throughout the forecasted period.

Know More About Global Blockchain technology in Healthcare Report?