Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy
Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy

Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Comprehensive Study by Type (Unified Messaging, Enterprise Telephony, Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing), Instant Messaging, Mobility, Others), Application (Large Organizations, Small and Mid-size Organizations), Platform (Desktop, Tablet, Smartphone, Others), Deployment (Private, Public, Hybrid), Features (Managed Services, FedRAMP Authorized, Secure Connections, Call Controls, Others) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2021- 2026  

Jun 2021 Edition 238 Pages 200 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Market Overview:
Unified communication-as-a-service in energy is designed to boost the efficiency, productivity, reliability, and security of the sophisticated carrier-class networks used in the energy sector. The service comprises unified messaging, enterprise telephony, meetings, instant messaging, mobility, and others. The unified communication includes various components like data centers, compute, racks, networks, blades, and other common systems. This service in the energy sector facilitates the management, provisioning, and performance usage reporting helping in enhancing the operations. Some of the players profiled in the study are Google (United States), Microsoft (United States), Verizon (United States), Cisco Systems, Inc. (United States), AT&T Inc. (United States), Atos (France), Avaya (United States), BT Group plc (United Kingdom), West Corporation (United States), Polycom, Inc. (United States) and Route 101 Ltd. (United Kingdom).

On the basis of geography, the market of Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). North America region held largest market share in the year 2020. Europe on the other hand stood as second largest market due to the presence of key companies into the region and high technological advancement. If we see Market by Platform, the sub-segment i.e. Desktop will boost the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Deployment, the sub-segment i.e. Private will boost the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Features, the sub-segment i.e. Managed Services will boost the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Growth Drivers
  • Growing Energy and Power Generation Industry Worldwide
  • Demand for the Productivity, Efficiency, and Reduced Cost in Energy Operations

Influencing Trend
  • Integration of Cloud Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy

Restraints
  • Problems with the Network Infrastructure Hindering Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Market

Opportunities
  • Growing Government Spenidngs on the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy

Challenges
  • Technological Issues with Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy


Key Market Developments:


On 14th January 2021, Atos SE and RingCentral, Inc. a leading provider of global enterprise cloud communications, collaboration, video meetings, and contact center solutions, announced the first release of Unify Office (UO) in the United States. A Unified Communications-as-a-Service (UCaaS), UO enables businesses to communicate and collaborate with ease using industry-leading voice, video, and team messaging capabilities from anywhere and on any device via a single enterprise solution.

Target Audience:
Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Providers, Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Industry Association, Research and Development Institutes, Potential Investors, Regulatory Bodies and Others

Major Objectives Focused through this Study
• To define, describe, and forecast the Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market on the basis of product [Unified Messaging, Enterprise Telephony, Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing), Instant Messaging, Mobility and Others] , application [Large Organizations and Small and Mid-size Organizations], key regions and end user
• To provide in-depth information regarding major influencing factors affecting the growth of the market (trends, drivers, restraints, opportunities, and industry-centric and regional challenges)
• To strategically analyse the micro-markets and important business segments with respect to individual growth drivers , market trends and potential, and historical contributions to the total market
• Identifying the opportunities in the market for key stakeholders and detailing the competitive landscape for market leaders
• To provide market size for various segments of the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market with respect to major geographies, namely, South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico)
• To strategically profile the key players and analyzing their market shares and core competencies in the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy industry
• To track key developments such as product launches, expansions, agreements, partnerships, mergers & acquisitions, and R&D activities that are key factors in shaping the market

Available Customization:
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research are .
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase

While framing the research framework, major and emerging players operating in the Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy market in various regions have been profiled, and their offerings, geographic footprints, and distribution/sales channels have been analysed through in-depth discussions. The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, analyst team keeps preparing set of questionnaires and after getting appointee list; the target audience are then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connection that includes email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey etc.
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Unified Messaging
  • Enterprise Telephony
  • Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing)
  • Instant Messaging
  • Mobility
  • Others
By Application
  • Large Organizations
  • Small and Mid-size Organizations
By Platform
  • Desktop
  • Tablet
  • Smartphone
  • Others

By Deployment
  • Private
  • Public
  • Hybrid

By Features
  • Managed Services
  • FedRAMP Authorized
  • Secure Connections
  • Call Controls
  • Others

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing Energy and Power Generation Industry Worldwide
      • 3.2.2. Demand for the Productivity, Efficiency, and Reduced Cost in Energy Operations
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Technological Issues with Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Integration of Cloud Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type, Application, Platform, Deployment, Features and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Unified Messaging
        • 5.2.1.2. Enterprise Telephony
        • 5.2.1.3. Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing)
        • 5.2.1.4. Instant Messaging
        • 5.2.1.5. Mobility
        • 5.2.1.6. Others
      • 5.2.2. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Large Organizations
        • 5.2.2.2. Small and Mid-size Organizations
      • 5.2.3. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Platform (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Desktop
        • 5.2.3.2. Tablet
        • 5.2.3.3. Smartphone
        • 5.2.3.4. Others
      • 5.2.4. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Deployment (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Private
        • 5.2.4.2. Public
        • 5.2.4.3. Hybrid
      • 5.2.5. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Features (Value)
        • 5.2.5.1. Managed Services
        • 5.2.5.2. FedRAMP Authorized
        • 5.2.5.3. Secure Connections
        • 5.2.5.4. Call Controls
        • 5.2.5.5. Others
      • 5.2.6. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Region
        • 5.2.6.1. South America
          • 5.2.6.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.6.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.6.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.6.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.6.2.1. China
          • 5.2.6.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.6.2.3. India
          • 5.2.6.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.6.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.6.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.6.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.6.3. Europe
          • 5.2.6.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.6.3.2. France
          • 5.2.6.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.6.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.6.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.6.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.6.4. MEA
          • 5.2.6.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.6.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.6.5. North America
          • 5.2.6.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.6.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.6.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Google (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Microsoft (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Verizon (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Cisco Systems, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. AT&T Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Atos (France)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Avaya (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. BT Group plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. West Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Polycom, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. Route 101 Ltd. (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Sale, by Type, Application, Platform, Deployment, Features and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Unified Messaging
        • 7.2.1.2. Enterprise Telephony
        • 7.2.1.3. Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing)
        • 7.2.1.4. Instant Messaging
        • 7.2.1.5. Mobility
        • 7.2.1.6. Others
      • 7.2.2. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Large Organizations
        • 7.2.2.2. Small and Mid-size Organizations
      • 7.2.3. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Platform (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Desktop
        • 7.2.3.2. Tablet
        • 7.2.3.3. Smartphone
        • 7.2.3.4. Others
      • 7.2.4. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Deployment (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Private
        • 7.2.4.2. Public
        • 7.2.4.3. Hybrid
      • 7.2.5. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy by: Features (Value)
        • 7.2.5.1. Managed Services
        • 7.2.5.2. FedRAMP Authorized
        • 7.2.5.3. Secure Connections
        • 7.2.5.4. Call Controls
        • 7.2.5.5. Others
      • 7.2.6. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Region
        • 7.2.6.1. South America
          • 7.2.6.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.6.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.6.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.6.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.6.2.1. China
          • 7.2.6.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.6.2.3. India
          • 7.2.6.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.6.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.6.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.6.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.6.3. Europe
          • 7.2.6.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.6.3.2. France
          • 7.2.6.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.6.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.6.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.6.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.6.4. MEA
          • 7.2.6.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.6.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.6.5. North America
          • 7.2.6.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.6.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.6.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Unified Messaging , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Enterprise Telephony , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing) , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Instant Messaging , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Mobility , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 9. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Large Organizations , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Small and Mid-size Organizations , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Desktop , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Tablet , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Smartphone , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 17. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Private , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Public , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Hybrid , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Features(USD Million)
  • Table 21. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Managed Services , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy FedRAMP Authorized , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Secure Connections , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Call Controls , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 131. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 132. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 133. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 134. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 135. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 136. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 137. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 138. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 139. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 140. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 141. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 142. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 143. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 144. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 145. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 146. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 147. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 148. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 149. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 150. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 151. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 152. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 153. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 154. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 155. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 156. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 157. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 158. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 159. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 160. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 161. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 162. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 163. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 164. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 165. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 166. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 167. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 168. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 169. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 170. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 171. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 172. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 173. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Unified Messaging , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Enterprise Telephony , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Meetings (Audio/Video/Web Conferencing) , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Instant Messaging , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Mobility , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 180. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Large Organizations , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Small and Mid-size Organizations , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 183. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Desktop , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Tablet , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Smartphone , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 188. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Private , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Public , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Hybrid , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Features(USD Million)
  • Table 192. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Managed Services , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy FedRAMP Authorized , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Secure Connections , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Call Controls , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Brazil Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Argentina Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Rest of South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. China Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Japan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. India Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. South Korea Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Taiwan Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. Australia Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. Rest of Asia-Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 269. Germany Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 270. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 271. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 272. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 273. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 274. France Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 275. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 276. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 277. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 278. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 279. Italy Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 280. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 281. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 282. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 283. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 284. United Kingdom Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 285. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 286. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 287. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 288. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 289. Netherlands Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 290. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 291. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 292. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 293. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 294. Rest of Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 295. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 296. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 297. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 298. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 299. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 300. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 301. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 302. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 303. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 304. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 305. Middle East Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 306. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 307. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 308. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 309. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 310. Africa Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 311. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 312. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 313. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 314. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 315. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 316. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 317. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 318. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 319. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 320. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 321. United States Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 322. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 323. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 324. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 325. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 326. Canada Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 327. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 328. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 329. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 330. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 331. Mexico Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy, by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 332. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 333. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 334. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Deployment USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Features USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 9. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 14. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. Google (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Google (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Microsoft (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Microsoft (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Verizon (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Verizon (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Cisco Systems, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Cisco Systems, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. AT&T Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. AT&T Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Atos (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Atos (France) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Avaya (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Avaya (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. BT Group plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. BT Group plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. West Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. West Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Polycom, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Polycom, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Route 101 Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. Route 101 Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 40. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 42. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 43. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Deployment USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 44. Global Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy: by Features USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 45. South America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. Asia Pacific Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. Europe Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 48. MEA Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. North America Unified Communication-as-a-Service in Energy Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Google (United States)
  • Microsoft (United States)
  • Verizon (United States)
  • Cisco Systems, Inc. (United States)
  • AT&T Inc. (United States)
  • Atos (France)
  • Avaya (United States)
  • BT Group plc (United Kingdom)
  • West Corporation (United States)
  • Polycom, Inc. (United States)
  • Route 101 Ltd. (United Kingdom)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation