Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Market

Agricultural Nanotechnology Comprehensive Study by Type (Crop Protection, Soil Improvement, Water Purification, Plant Breeding, Nanoparticles Production), Application (Nanoscale Carriers, Nano lignocellulosic Materials, Clay Nanotubes, Biosensors, Others), Components (Nano Materials, Nano Tools, Nano Devices), End Users (Land Farming, Indoor Farming, Others) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Agricultural Nanotechnology Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
The rapid development in agriculture is driving huge demand in this market. Nanotechnology enhances positive value for agriculture production. Nanoparticles is having unique properties because of their small size. The agriculture industry s using nanotechnology for reducing the influence of agrochemicals on the environment. This technology enhances the possibilities of developing conventional and stranded agriculture business.This growth is primarily driven by Development in Agriculture, according to the Study this Industry is Expected to Reach USD 2.9 Trillion By the Year 2030 and Rapid Increase in Population Size.

Globally, a noticeable market trend is evident Increase in Investment from Market Leading Players . Major Vendors, such as IntechOpen (England), Nanosys Inc. (United States), ASML Holding (Netherlands), Zyvex (United States), Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom), Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom) and ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary) etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Market Drivers
  • Development in Agriculture, according to the Study this Industry is Expected to Reach USD 2.9 Trillion By the Year 2030
  • Rapid Increase in Population Size

Market Trend
  • Increase in Investment from Market Leading Players
  • Development in Farming Projects
  • Growing Demand for the Nano Materials in the Food Processing Industry

Restraints
  • The Slowdown in Economy Because of Coronavirus Pandemic

Opportunities
High Adoption of Technologies in Agriculture Business, Rapid Development in Expansion of Bio-Economy with Biological Based Raw Materials and High Investment in Research and Development
Challenges
Lack of Consumer Awareness and High Cost Associated with Nanotechnology

AMA Research follow a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mostly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcase the spontaneously changing Vendors landscape impacting the growth of the market. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyse the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts, but also include significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Agricultural Nanotechnology Study Sheds Light on
— The Agricultural Nanotechnology Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analyst at AMA organize and took survey of the Agricultural Nanotechnology industry Vendors. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Agricultural Nanotechnology industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Vendors can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold value they currently claim, or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Crop Protection
  • Soil Improvement
  • Water Purification
  • Plant Breeding
  • Nanoparticles Production
By Application
  • Nanoscale Carriers
  • Nano lignocellulosic Materials
  • Clay Nanotubes
  • Biosensors
  • Others
By Components
  • Nano Materials
  • Nano Tools
  • Nano Devices

By End Users
  • Land Farming
  • Indoor Farming
  • Others

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Development in Agriculture, according to the Study this Industry is Expected to Reach USD 2.9 Trillion By the Year 2030
      • 3.2.2. Rapid Increase in Population Size
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Consumer Awareness
      • 3.3.2. High Cost Associated with Nanotechnology
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increase in Investment from Market Leading Players
      • 3.4.2. Development in Farming Projects
      • 3.4.3. Growing Demand for the Nano Materials in the Food Processing Industry
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type, Application, Components, End Users and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Crop Protection
        • 5.2.1.2. Soil Improvement
        • 5.2.1.3. Water Purification
        • 5.2.1.4. Plant Breeding
        • 5.2.1.5. Nanoparticles Production
      • 5.2.2. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Nanoscale Carriers
        • 5.2.2.2. Nano lignocellulosic Materials
        • 5.2.2.3. Clay Nanotubes
        • 5.2.2.4. Biosensors
        • 5.2.2.5. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Components (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Nano Materials
        • 5.2.3.2. Nano Tools
        • 5.2.3.3. Nano Devices
      • 5.2.4. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: End Users (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Land Farming
        • 5.2.4.2. Indoor Farming
        • 5.2.4.3. Others
      • 5.2.5. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Agricultural Nanotechnology: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. IntechOpen (England)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Nanosys Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. ASML Holding (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Zyvex (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Sale, by Type, Application, Components, End Users and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Crop Protection
        • 7.2.1.2. Soil Improvement
        • 7.2.1.3. Water Purification
        • 7.2.1.4. Plant Breeding
        • 7.2.1.5. Nanoparticles Production
      • 7.2.2. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Nanoscale Carriers
        • 7.2.2.2. Nano lignocellulosic Materials
        • 7.2.2.3. Clay Nanotubes
        • 7.2.2.4. Biosensors
        • 7.2.2.5. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: Components (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Nano Materials
        • 7.2.3.2. Nano Tools
        • 7.2.3.3. Nano Devices
      • 7.2.4. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology by: End Users (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Land Farming
        • 7.2.4.2. Indoor Farming
        • 7.2.4.3. Others
      • 7.2.5. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Agricultural Nanotechnology Crop Protection , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Agricultural Nanotechnology Soil Improvement , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Agricultural Nanotechnology Water Purification , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Agricultural Nanotechnology Plant Breeding , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nanoparticles Production , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nanoscale Carriers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano lignocellulosic Materials , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Agricultural Nanotechnology Clay Nanotubes , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Agricultural Nanotechnology Biosensors , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Agricultural Nanotechnology Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Components(USD Million)
  • Table 14. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Materials , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Tools , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Devices , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by End Users(USD Million)
  • Table 18. Agricultural Nanotechnology Land Farming , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Agricultural Nanotechnology Indoor Farming , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Agricultural Nanotechnology Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 138. Agricultural Nanotechnology Crop Protection , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. Agricultural Nanotechnology Soil Improvement , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. Agricultural Nanotechnology Water Purification , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Agricultural Nanotechnology Plant Breeding , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nanoparticles Production , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 144. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nanoscale Carriers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano lignocellulosic Materials , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Agricultural Nanotechnology Clay Nanotubes , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Agricultural Nanotechnology Biosensors , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Agricultural Nanotechnology Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Components(USD Million)
  • Table 150. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Materials , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Tools , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Agricultural Nanotechnology Nano Devices , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Agricultural Nanotechnology: by End Users(USD Million)
  • Table 154. Agricultural Nanotechnology Land Farming , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Agricultural Nanotechnology Indoor Farming , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Agricultural Nanotechnology Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Brazil Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Argentina Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Rest of South America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. China Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Japan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. India Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. South Korea Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Taiwan Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Australia Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Germany Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. France Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Italy Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. United Kingdom Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Netherlands Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. Rest of Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Middle East Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Africa Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. United States Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Canada Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Mexico Agricultural Nanotechnology, by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 267. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 268. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Components USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by End Users USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. IntechOpen (England) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. IntechOpen (England) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. Nanosys Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Nanosys Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. ASML Holding (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. ASML Holding (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Zyvex (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Zyvex (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 31. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 32. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by Components USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 33. Global Agricultural Nanotechnology: by End Users USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 34. South America Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 35. Asia Pacific Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 36. Europe Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 37. MEA Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. North America Agricultural Nanotechnology Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • IntechOpen (England)
  • Nanosys Inc. (United States)
  • ASML Holding (Netherlands)
  • Zyvex (United States)
  • Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom)
  • Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom)
  • ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Oct 2021 223 Pages 83 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2016-2020; Base year: 2020; Forecast period: 2021 to 2026
Companies that are profiled in Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Market are IntechOpen (England), Nanosys Inc. (United States), ASML Holding (Netherlands), Zyvex (United States), Oxford Instruments plc (United Kingdom), Nanoco Group plc (United Kingdom) and ThalesNano Inc. (Hungary) etc.
The rapid development in agriculture is driving huge demand in this market. Nanotechnology enhances positive value for agriculture production. Nanoparticles is having unique properties because of their small size. The agriculture industry s using nanotechnology for reducing the influence of agrochemicals on the environment. This technology enhances the possibilities of developing conventional and stranded agriculture business.

Know More About Global Agricultural Nanotechnology Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Oat Seeds Comprehensive Study by Type (Organic, Heirloom), Application (Farmland, Greenhouse, Others), Distribution Channel (Online, Offline), Packaging (Below 5 kg, 5 to 10 kg, 10 to 25 kg, 25 to 50...
$ 3500
Palm Seed Oil Comprehensive Study by Type (Rough, Refining), Application (Food Industry, Surfactants, Personal Care, Cosmetics, Agrochemical), Composition (C8, C10, C12, Others) Players and Region - ...
$ 2500
Camelina Oil Comprehensive Study by Type (Food Grade, Industrial Grade), Application (Food Industry, Chemical Industry, Cosmetics), Distribution Chanel (Online, Offline) Players and Region - Global M...
$ 3500
Agricultural Software Comprehensive Study by Type (Farm Management, Livestock Management, Precision Agriculture Software, Others), Application (Field Management, Farming Operation, Irrigation, Animal...
$ 3450
Lotus Root Seeds Comprehensive Study by Type (Brown Peel, White), Application (Farmland, Greenhouse, Other), Packaging (Bagged, Canned) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2030
$ 3500
Camelina Seeds Comprehensive Study by Type (Food Grade, Industrial Grade), Application (Food and Beverages, Cosmetics and Personal Care, Others), Species (Alyssum, Microcarpa, Rumelica, Sativa) Playe...
$ 3400