Post-harvest Treatment
Post-harvest Treatment

Post-harvest Treatment Comprehensive Study by Type (Coatings, Fungicides, Cleaners, Sanitizers, Others), Treatment (Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation), Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others), Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others), Others), Crop Type (Fruits, Vegetables) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2027

Post-harvest Treatment Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2022- 2027  

Apr 2022 Edition 214 Pages 200 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
What is Post-harvest Treatment?
Postharvest handling is the step of crop production that occurs shortly after harvest and includes sorting, cooling, packing, and cleaning. When a crop is pulled from the ground or separated from its parent plant, it begins to decompose. Post-Harvest Treatment gives the finest sensory quality crops, vegetables, and fruits to consumers. Senescence and ripening processes begin in all harvested crops and goods, needing Post-Harvest Treatments to maintain product quality. The risk of contamination or microbial development is lowered since all physiological processes are halted. These treatment procedures are also used to manage water loss, reduce ethylene damage, and control insects. Organic Post-Harvest Treatments are becoming more popular as the demand for organic products develops.

The market study is broken down by Type (Coatings, Fungicides, Cleaners, Sanitizers and Others) and major geographies with country level break-up.

Mergers and acquisitions, expansions, investments, new service launches, and collaborations are among the companies' favoured techniques for exploring the market. Players are expanding and acquiring businesses in new geographies in order to get a competitive edge through synergy. The major key players are contributing there share for increasing company growth. Established and emerging Players should take a closer view at their existing organizations and reinvent traditional business and operating models to adapt to the future.

JBT Corporation (United States), Syngenta (Switzerland), Nufarm (Australia), Bayer (Germany), BASF (Germany), AgroFresh (United States, Decco (United States), Pace International (United States), Xeda International (France) and Fomesa Fruitech (Spain) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research coverage are Citrosol (Spain), Colin Campbell PTY LTD (Australia), Futureco Bioscience (Spain), Apeel Sciences (United States) and Polynatural (Chile).

Segmentation Overview
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Post-harvest Treatment market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Post-harvest Treatment has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Treatment, the sub-segment i.e. Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation) will boost the Post-harvest Treatment market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Crop Type, the sub-segment i.e. Fruits will boost the Post-harvest Treatment market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

In April 2021, Pace International introduced Bio Spectra 100SC postharvest technology to combat cherry rot. The method uses a natural decay control solution that has shown to be more effective against a number of fungal postharvest infections that affect cherries. and In July 2021, Agro Fresh Solutions, Inc. has announced the extension of their Control-Tec postharvest system across the Americas, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, following its successful installation in Chile. Control-Tec is a programmable, automated postharvest technology that helps packinghouses save water while also preventing illness.


Market Trend
  • Increasing Consumption of Agricultural Products

Market Drivers
  • Increasing Demand for Exotic Fruits and Vegetables Due to a Boom in the Hospitality Industry
  • Increase of Health Conscious People

Opportunities
  • New Technologies are available to improve productivity and quality of crop
  • Growing local and regional demand for Post-Harvest Treatment

Restraints
  • High Costs Associated with the Products
  • Strict Government Regulations

Challenges
  • Physiological deterioration may causing infections problem
  • Climate Change Create a Challenge for any Crop


Key Target Audience
Industry Association, Downstream Vendors, Marketing & Consulting firms, Venture Capitalists, Government & Regulatory Bodies and Major companies and Investors

About Approach
To evaluate and validate the market size various sources including primary and secondary analysis is utilized. AMA Research follows regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have the better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with purpose to understand company’s positioning regarding market value, volume and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders etc. and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, analyst team keeps preparing set of questionnaires and after getting appointee list; the target audience are then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connection that includes email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey etc.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

1. What all players are profiled in the study?
The standard version of the report profiles players such as JBT Corporation (United States), Syngenta (Switzerland), Nufarm (Australia), Bayer (Germany), BASF (Germany), AgroFresh (United States, Decco (United States), Pace International (United States), Xeda International (France) and Fomesa Fruitech (Spain) etc.

2. Can we have customized study for Post-harvest Treatment Market?
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.

3. What would be the Market Size of Post-harvest Treatment Market by 2027?
Analysts at AMA estimates Post-harvest Treatment Market to reach USD Million by 2027.
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Coatings
  • Fungicides
  • Cleaners
  • Sanitizers
  • Others
By Treatment
  • Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation)
  • Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others)
  • Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others)
  • Others

By Crop Type
  • Fruits
  • Vegetables

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing Demand for Exotic Fruits and Vegetables Due to a Boom in the Hospitality Industry
      • 3.2.2. Increase of Health Conscious People
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Physiological deterioration may causing infections problem
      • 3.3.2. Climate Change Create a Challenge for any Crop
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Consumption of Agricultural Products
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Post-harvest Treatment, by Type, Treatment, Crop Type and Region (value and price ) (2016-2021)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Post-harvest Treatment (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Coatings
        • 5.2.1.2. Fungicides
        • 5.2.1.3. Cleaners
        • 5.2.1.4. Sanitizers
        • 5.2.1.5. Others
      • 5.2.2. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Treatment (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation)
        • 5.2.2.2. Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others)
        • 5.2.2.3. Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others)
        • 5.2.2.4. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Crop Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Fruits
        • 5.2.3.2. Vegetables
      • 5.2.4. Global Post-harvest Treatment Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Post-harvest Treatment (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Post-harvest Treatment: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2021)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. JBT Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Syngenta (Switzerland)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Nufarm (Australia)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Bayer (Germany)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. BASF (Germany)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. AgroFresh (United States
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Decco (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Pace International (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Xeda International (France)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Fomesa Fruitech (Spain)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Post-harvest Treatment Sale, by Type, Treatment, Crop Type and Region (value and price ) (2022-2027)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Post-harvest Treatment (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Coatings
        • 7.2.1.2. Fungicides
        • 7.2.1.3. Cleaners
        • 7.2.1.4. Sanitizers
        • 7.2.1.5. Others
      • 7.2.2. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Treatment (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation)
        • 7.2.2.2. Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others)
        • 7.2.2.3. Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others)
        • 7.2.2.4. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Crop Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Fruits
        • 7.2.3.2. Vegetables
      • 7.2.4. Global Post-harvest Treatment Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Post-harvest Treatment (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Post-harvest Treatment by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Post-harvest Treatment: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Post-harvest Treatment Coatings , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 3. Post-harvest Treatment Fungicides , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 4. Post-harvest Treatment Cleaners , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 5. Post-harvest Treatment Sanitizers , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 6. Post-harvest Treatment Others , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 7. Post-harvest Treatment: by Treatment(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Post-harvest Treatment Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation) , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 9. Post-harvest Treatment Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others) , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 10. Post-harvest Treatment Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others) , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 11. Post-harvest Treatment Others , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 12. Post-harvest Treatment: by Crop Type(USD Million)
  • Table 13. Post-harvest Treatment Fruits , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 14. Post-harvest Treatment Vegetables , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 15. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 16. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 17. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 18. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 19. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 20. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 21. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 22. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 23. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 24. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 27. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 31. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 32. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 33. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 34. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 35. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 36. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 37. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 38. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 39. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 40. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 41. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 42. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 43. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 46. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 47. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 48. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 49. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 52. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 53. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 54. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 55. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 56. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 57. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 58. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 59. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 60. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 61. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 62. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 63. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 64. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 65. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 68. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 71. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 74. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 75. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 76. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 77. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 78. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 79. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 80. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 81. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 82. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 83. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 84. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 85. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 86. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 87. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 88. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 89. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 90. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 91. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 92. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 93. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 94. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 95. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 96. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 97. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 98. Post-harvest Treatment: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 109. Post-harvest Treatment: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 110. Post-harvest Treatment Coatings , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 111. Post-harvest Treatment Fungicides , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 112. Post-harvest Treatment Cleaners , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 113. Post-harvest Treatment Sanitizers , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 114. Post-harvest Treatment Others , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 115. Post-harvest Treatment: by Treatment(USD Million)
  • Table 116. Post-harvest Treatment Physical treatments (Heat treatment, Irradiation) , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 117. Post-harvest Treatment Chemical treatments (Nitric oxide, Sulfur dioxide, others) , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 118. Post-harvest Treatment Gaseous treatments (Ozone, Ethylene, Others) , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 119. Post-harvest Treatment Others , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 120. Post-harvest Treatment: by Crop Type(USD Million)
  • Table 121. Post-harvest Treatment Fruits , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 122. Post-harvest Treatment Vegetables , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 123. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 124. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 125. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 126. South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 127. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 128. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 129. Brazil Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 130. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 131. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 132. Argentina Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 133. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 134. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 135. Rest of South America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 136. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 137. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 138. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 139. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 140. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 141. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 142. China Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 143. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 144. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 145. Japan Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 146. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 147. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 148. India Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 149. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 150. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 151. South Korea Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 152. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 153. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 154. Taiwan Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 155. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 156. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 157. Australia Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 158. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 159. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 160. Rest of Asia-Pacific Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 161. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 162. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 163. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 164. Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 165. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 166. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 167. Germany Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 168. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 169. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 170. France Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 171. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 172. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 173. Italy Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 174. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 175. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 176. United Kingdom Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 177. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 178. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 179. Netherlands Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 180. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 181. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 182. Rest of Europe Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 183. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 184. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 185. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 186. MEA Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 187. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 188. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 189. Middle East Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 190. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 191. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 192. Africa Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 193. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 194. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 195. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 196. North America Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 197. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 198. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 199. United States Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 200. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 201. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 202. Canada Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 203. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 204. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 205. Mexico Post-harvest Treatment, by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 206. Post-harvest Treatment: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 207. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 208. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 209. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 5. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Treatment USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 6. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Crop Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 7. South America Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Type USD/Units (2016-2021)
  • Figure 13. Global Post-harvest Treatment share by Players 2021 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Post-harvest Treatment share by Players (Top 3) 2021(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Post-harvest Treatment share by Players (Top 5) 2021(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. JBT Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. JBT Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 19. Syngenta (Switzerland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Syngenta (Switzerland) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 21. Nufarm (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Nufarm (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 23. Bayer (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Bayer (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 25. BASF (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. BASF (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 27. AgroFresh (United States Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. AgroFresh (United States Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 29. Decco (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Decco (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 31. Pace International (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Pace International (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 33. Xeda International (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Xeda International (France) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 35. Fomesa Fruitech (Spain) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Fomesa Fruitech (Spain) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 37. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 38. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Treatment USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 39. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Crop Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 40. South America Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Asia Pacific Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Europe Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. MEA Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. North America Post-harvest Treatment Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. Global Post-harvest Treatment: by Type USD/Units (2022-2027)
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • JBT Corporation (United States)
  • Syngenta (Switzerland)
  • Nufarm (Australia)
  • Bayer (Germany)
  • BASF (Germany)
  • AgroFresh (United States
  • Decco (United States)
  • Pace International (United States)
  • Xeda International (France)
  • Fomesa Fruitech (Spain)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Citrosol (Spain) , Colin Campbell PTY LTD (Australia) , Futureco Bioscience (Spain) , Apeel Sciences (United States) , Polynatural (Chile)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation