Global Underwater Acoustic Communication
Global Underwater Acoustic Communication

Underwater Acoustic Communication Comprehensive Study by Type (Shallow Water Range, Medium Water Range, Long Water Range, Full Ocean Range), Application (Environmental Monitoring, Pollution Monitoring, Climate Recording, Hydrography, Oceanography, Aquaculture, Fisheries, Diving, Mine Reconnaissance), Interface Type (Sensor Interface, Acoustic Modem, Others), End User (Oil & Gas, Military & Defense, Scientific Research & Development, Marine) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Underwater Acoustic Communication Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2021- 2026  

Feb 2021 Edition 219 Pages 200 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
What is Underwater Acoustic Communication?
In recent years, underwater acoustic (UWA) communications have received much attention as their applications are beginning to shift from military towards commercial.es. Wireless underwater communications can be established by the transmission of acoustic waves. Due to the complex physical characteristics of water, an acoustic wave is the only media available for underwater wireless communication at any distance. The underwater acoustic communication channels, however, have limited bandwidth, and often cause signal dispersion in time and frequency. Despite these limitations, underwater acoustic communications are a rapidly growing field of research and engineering.

The market study is broken down by Type (Shallow Water Range, Medium Water Range, Long Water Range and Full Ocean Range), by Application (Environmental Monitoring, Pollution Monitoring, Climate Recording, Hydrography, Oceanography, Aquaculture, Fisheries, Diving and Mine Reconnaissance) and major geographies with country level break-up.

The companies are exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new service launches, and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are exploring new geographies through expansions and acquisitions to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Research Analyst at AMA estimates that Players from United States will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Underwater Acoustic Communication market throughout the predicted period.

Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (United States), Kongsberg Gruppen (Norway), Thales Group (France), Ultra Electronics Group (United Kingdom), Sonardyne International Ltd. (United Kingdom), Evologics GmbH (Germany), DSPComm (Australia), Mistral, Inc. (United States), Nortek AS (Norway), Aquatec Group Ltd. (United Kingdom) and Baltrobotics Sp.z.o.o (Poland) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research coverage are G5 Scientific, LLC. (United States), JPAnalytics LLC. (United States), Seagnal SAS (France), AquaSent LLC. (United States), Proserv (United Kingdom) and Subnero Pte. Ltd. (Singapore).

Segmentation Overview
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Underwater Acoustic Communication market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Underwater Acoustic Communication has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Interface Type, the sub-segment i.e. Sensor Interface will boost the Underwater Acoustic Communication market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by End User, the sub-segment i.e. Oil & Gas will boost the Underwater Acoustic Communication market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

In June 2020 GeoSpectrum Technologies Canada, GeoSpectrum Technologies (GeoSpectrum) announces that it was selected to deliver its Long-Range Acoustic Messaging (LRAM) system to another Western customer. This follows a recent successful delivery of LRAM equipment to the Canadian Government.


Market Trend
  • Technological advancement in the Underwater Acoustic Communication in the

Market Drivers
  • Rising Adoption of Underwater Acoustic Modems in Naval Defense
  • Increasing awareness of the Importance of Reliable and Secured Communication in Defense and Homeland Security End-User

Opportunities
  • The rising concern of government towards the Environmental Protection

Restraints
  • Limited Speed of Data Transmission and Delayed Delivery Rates Due to the Relatively Slow Speed of Sound in Water

Challenges
  • Availability of Limited Usable Frequency Band


Key Target Audience
New Entrants/Investors, Analysts and Strategic Business Planners, Underwater Acoustic Communication Provider, Government Regulatory and Research Organizations and End-Use Industry

About Approach
During this study the evaluation and validation of the market size is done through various sources including primary and secondary analysis. AMA Research & Media follows industrial and regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have the better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with purpose to understand company’s positioning regarding market value, volume and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders etc. and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, analyst team keeps preparing set of questionnaires and after getting appointee list; the target audience are then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connection that includes email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey etc.

Customization available in this Study:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Shallow Water Range
  • Medium Water Range
  • Long Water Range
  • Full Ocean Range
By Application
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Pollution Monitoring
  • Climate Recording
  • Hydrography
  • Oceanography
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • Diving
  • Mine Reconnaissance
By Interface Type
  • Sensor Interface
  • Acoustic Modem
  • Others

By End User
  • Oil & Gas
  • Military & Defense
  • Scientific Research & Development
  • Marine

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Rising Adoption of Underwater Acoustic Modems in Naval Defense
      • 3.2.2. Increasing awareness of the Importance of Reliable and Secured Communication in Defense and Homeland Security End-User
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Availability of Limited Usable Frequency Band
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Technological advancement in the Underwater Acoustic Communication in the
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type, Application, Interface Type, End User and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Shallow Water Range
        • 5.2.1.2. Medium Water Range
        • 5.2.1.3. Long Water Range
        • 5.2.1.4. Full Ocean Range
      • 5.2.2. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Environmental Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.2. Pollution Monitoring
        • 5.2.2.3. Climate Recording
        • 5.2.2.4. Hydrography
        • 5.2.2.5. Oceanography
        • 5.2.2.6. Aquaculture
        • 5.2.2.7. Fisheries
        • 5.2.2.8. Diving
        • 5.2.2.9. Mine Reconnaissance
      • 5.2.3. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Interface Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Sensor Interface
        • 5.2.3.2. Acoustic Modem
        • 5.2.3.3. Others
      • 5.2.4. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: End User (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Oil & Gas
        • 5.2.4.2. Military & Defense
        • 5.2.4.3. Scientific Research & Development
        • 5.2.4.4. Marine
      • 5.2.5. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Underwater Acoustic Communication: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Kongsberg Gruppen (Norway)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Thales Group (France)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Ultra Electronics Group (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Sonardyne International Ltd. (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Evologics GmbH (Germany)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. DSPComm (Australia), Mistral, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Nortek AS (Norway)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Aquatec Group Ltd. (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Baltrobotics Sp.z.o.o (Poland)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication Sale, by Type, Application, Interface Type, End User and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Shallow Water Range
        • 7.2.1.2. Medium Water Range
        • 7.2.1.3. Long Water Range
        • 7.2.1.4. Full Ocean Range
      • 7.2.2. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Environmental Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.2. Pollution Monitoring
        • 7.2.2.3. Climate Recording
        • 7.2.2.4. Hydrography
        • 7.2.2.5. Oceanography
        • 7.2.2.6. Aquaculture
        • 7.2.2.7. Fisheries
        • 7.2.2.8. Diving
        • 7.2.2.9. Mine Reconnaissance
      • 7.2.3. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: Interface Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Sensor Interface
        • 7.2.3.2. Acoustic Modem
        • 7.2.3.3. Others
      • 7.2.4. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication by: End User (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Oil & Gas
        • 7.2.4.2. Military & Defense
        • 7.2.4.3. Scientific Research & Development
        • 7.2.4.4. Marine
      • 7.2.5. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Underwater Acoustic Communication Shallow Water Range , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Underwater Acoustic Communication Medium Water Range , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Underwater Acoustic Communication Long Water Range , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Underwater Acoustic Communication Full Ocean Range , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Underwater Acoustic Communication Environmental Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Underwater Acoustic Communication Pollution Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Underwater Acoustic Communication Climate Recording , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Underwater Acoustic Communication Hydrography , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Underwater Acoustic Communication Oceanography , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Underwater Acoustic Communication Aquaculture , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Underwater Acoustic Communication Fisheries , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Underwater Acoustic Communication Diving , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Underwater Acoustic Communication Mine Reconnaissance , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Interface Type(USD Million)
  • Table 17. Underwater Acoustic Communication Sensor Interface , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Underwater Acoustic Communication Acoustic Modem , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Underwater Acoustic Communication Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 21. Underwater Acoustic Communication Oil & Gas , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Underwater Acoustic Communication Military & Defense , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Underwater Acoustic Communication Scientific Research & Development , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Underwater Acoustic Communication Marine , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 131. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 132. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 133. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 140. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 141. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 142. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 143. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 144. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 145. Underwater Acoustic Communication Shallow Water Range , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Underwater Acoustic Communication Medium Water Range , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Underwater Acoustic Communication Long Water Range , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Underwater Acoustic Communication Full Ocean Range , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 150. Underwater Acoustic Communication Environmental Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Underwater Acoustic Communication Pollution Monitoring , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Underwater Acoustic Communication Climate Recording , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Underwater Acoustic Communication Hydrography , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Underwater Acoustic Communication Oceanography , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Underwater Acoustic Communication Aquaculture , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Underwater Acoustic Communication Fisheries , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Underwater Acoustic Communication Diving , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Underwater Acoustic Communication Mine Reconnaissance , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Interface Type(USD Million)
  • Table 160. Underwater Acoustic Communication Sensor Interface , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Underwater Acoustic Communication Acoustic Modem , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Underwater Acoustic Communication Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Underwater Acoustic Communication: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 164. Underwater Acoustic Communication Oil & Gas , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Underwater Acoustic Communication Military & Defense , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Underwater Acoustic Communication Scientific Research & Development , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Underwater Acoustic Communication Marine , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Brazil Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Argentina Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Rest of South America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. China Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Japan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. India Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. South Korea Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Taiwan Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Australia Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Rest of Asia-Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. Germany Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. France Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. Italy Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. United Kingdom Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Netherlands Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Rest of Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. Middle East Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Africa Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. United States Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 269. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 270. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 271. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 272. Canada Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 273. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 274. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 275. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 276. Mexico Underwater Acoustic Communication, by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 277. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 278. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 279. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Interface Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by End User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 19. Kongsberg Gruppen (Norway) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Kongsberg Gruppen (Norway) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 21. Thales Group (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Thales Group (France) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 23. Ultra Electronics Group (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Ultra Electronics Group (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 25. Sonardyne International Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Sonardyne International Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 27. Evologics GmbH (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Evologics GmbH (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 29. DSPComm (Australia), Mistral, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. DSPComm (Australia), Mistral, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 31. Nortek AS (Norway) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Nortek AS (Norway) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 33. Aquatec Group Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Aquatec Group Ltd. (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 35. Baltrobotics Sp.z.o.o (Poland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Baltrobotics Sp.z.o.o (Poland) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 37. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by Interface Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Underwater Acoustic Communication: by End User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. South America Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Underwater Acoustic Communication Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (United States)
  • Kongsberg Gruppen (Norway)
  • Thales Group (France)
  • Ultra Electronics Group (United Kingdom)
  • Sonardyne International Ltd. (United Kingdom)
  • Evologics GmbH (Germany)
  • DSPComm (Australia), Mistral, Inc. (United States)
  • Nortek AS (Norway)
  • Aquatec Group Ltd. (United Kingdom)
  • Baltrobotics Sp.z.o.o (Poland)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
G5 Scientific, LLC. (United States) , JPAnalytics LLC. (United States) , Seagnal SAS (France) , AquaSent LLC. (United States) , Proserv (United Kingdom) , Subnero Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation