Protective Cultures Comprehensive Study by Type (Pure Culture, Mixed Culture), Application (Dairy Based Products, Meat & poultry Products, Seafood, Bakery & Confectioneries, RTE Food Products, Beverages), Composition (Single strain, Multi-strain), Form (Frozen, Freeze-dried), Microorganism (Bacteria (LAB, GCC+), Fungi) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Protective Cultures Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
What is Protective Cultures?
Protective cultures are is composition of live microorganisms. This composition may be pure or mixture of two or more bacteria. This protective culture is added to foods to reduce the spoilage caused by pathogenic or toxigenic microorganisms. This culture inhibit growth of pathogenic and toxigenic microorganisms in foods. In 2002, Bech Hansen coined the term “bio protection” for protective cultures. Protective cultures also essential for non-fermented foods with a neutral pH value and high water activity. This type of food are at high risk of spoilage hence they requires protective cultures. It has huge potential for dairy industry, as control of spoilage yeast and moulds is provided by antifungal protective cultures. Protective cultures provide distinctive features to boiled meat products to increase their shelf life. They useful for preservation, manage their taste, control of its hygiene, maintain and improve quality with desirable qualities. Further, they helps to restore back the essential nutritional characteristics which enhance the taste. Increasing preference for ready to eat food products and growing meat industry is driving the demand for market. According to the study, the market processed meat is anticipated to rise over USD 1.5 trillion by 2022. Geographically, Europe is expected to dominate the Protective cultures market owing to rising demand for processed meat & dairy based products with changing a shift in lifestyle trends and extensive presence of market player. Further, North America is expected to grow at the highest growth rate in the forecast period of due to technological advancements for monitoring protective cultures and adapting changing technologies for production of processed meat & dairy based products.

The market study is broken down by Type (Pure Culture and Mixed Culture), by Application (Dairy Based Products, Meat & poultry Products, Seafood, Bakery & Confectioneries, RTE Food Products and Beverages) and major geographies with country level break-up.

There are various companies are operating in the market to provides protective cultures. Increased demand for processed meat and dairy based ready to eat products is impacting on the demand for meat starter cultures positive manner. Hence to grab the opportunity associated with the market, many new market players are entering to the market. The market leaders are investing on organic and non-organic strategic growth initiatives to become dominant in this industry. Established and emerging Players should take a closer view at their existing organizations and reinvent traditional business and operating models to adapt to the future.

Chr. Hansen (Denmark), Kerry Group(Ireland), Frutarom(Israel), Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain), D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand), DSM (Netherlands), Microtec Gmbh (Germany), Angel Yeast(China), Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom), Biovitec(France), Lesaffre(France), Dohler(Germany), CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands), Natren(United States) and Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research coverage are Meat Cracks Technology GmbH (Germany), Dalton Biotechnologies (Italy) and Aristomenis D. Phikas & Co SA. (Greece).

Segmentation Overview
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Protective Cultures market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Protective Cultures has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Composition, the sub-segment i.e. Single strain will boost the Protective Cultures market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Form, the sub-segment i.e. Frozen will boost the Protective Cultures market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Microorganism , the sub-segment i.e. Bacteria (LAB, GCC+) will boost the Protective Cultures market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.




Market Trend
  • Growing Preference for Labelled Food Products

Market Drivers
  • Raised Inclination of Consumer Inclination toward Ready to Cook Packaged Food Products Is Driving the Demand for Protective Culture
  • High Shelf Life of Food Products Due to Use of Protective Culture Is Impacting On the Demand Positively Increasing Meat Processing Industry
  • Growing Cold Chains Facilities and Storages

Opportunities
  • Introduction of Ready to Cook and Cost Effective Processed Food Products in the Market Is Providing Opportunity for the Growth of the Market
  • Ongoing R&D in Flavour Genesis and Gene Technology for Production of Cultures to Provide Wide Range Protective Cultures

Restraints
  • Stringent Environmental Regulations for the Use of Protective Cultures in Meat & Seafood

Challenges
  • Less Focusing On Use of Proper Technology in Monitoring Of Protective Cultures in Emerging Countries
  • High Cost Associated With Maintenance of Protective Cultures


Key Target Audience
Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms, New Entrants/Investors, Strategic Business Planners, Protective Culture Manufacturers, Suppliers and Distributors, Government Regulatory, Research Organizations and End-Use Industries

About Approach
To evaluate and validate the market size various sources including primary and secondary analysis is utilized. AMA Research follows regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have the better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with purpose to understand company’s positioning regarding market value, volume and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders etc. and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, analyst team keeps preparing set of questionnaires and after getting appointee list; the target audience are then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connection that includes email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Pure Culture
  • Mixed Culture
By Application
  • Dairy Based Products
  • Meat & poultry Products
  • Seafood
  • Bakery & Confectioneries
  • RTE Food Products
  • Beverages
By Composition
  • Single strain
  • Multi-strain

By Form
  • Frozen
  • Freeze-dried

By Microorganism
  • Bacteria (LAB, GCC+)
  • Fungi

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Raised Inclination of Consumer Inclination toward Ready to Cook Packaged Food Products Is Driving the Demand for Protective Culture
      • 3.2.2. High Shelf Life of Food Products Due to Use of Protective Culture Is Impacting On the Demand Positively Increasing Meat Processing Industry
      • 3.2.3. Growing Cold Chains Facilities and Storages
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Less Focusing On Use of Proper Technology in Monitoring Of Protective Cultures in Emerging Countries
      • 3.3.2. High Cost Associated With Maintenance of Protective Cultures
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Growing Preference for Labelled Food Products
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Protective Cultures, by Type, Application, Composition, Form, Microorganism and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Protective Cultures (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Protective Cultures by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Pure Culture
        • 5.2.1.2. Mixed Culture
      • 5.2.2. Global Protective Cultures by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Dairy Based Products
        • 5.2.2.2. Meat & poultry Products
        • 5.2.2.3. Seafood
        • 5.2.2.4. Bakery & Confectioneries
        • 5.2.2.5. RTE Food Products
        • 5.2.2.6. Beverages
      • 5.2.3. Global Protective Cultures by: Composition (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Single strain
        • 5.2.3.2. Multi-strain
      • 5.2.4. Global Protective Cultures by: Form (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Frozen
        • 5.2.4.2. Freeze-dried
      • 5.2.5. Global Protective Cultures Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Protective Cultures (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Protective Cultures by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Protective Cultures: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Chr. Hansen (Denmark)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Kerry Group(Ireland)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Frutarom(Israel)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. DSM (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Microtec Gmbh (Germany)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Angel Yeast(China)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Biovitec(France)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. Lesaffre(France)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Dohler(Germany)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.14. Natren(United States)
        • 6.4.14.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.14.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.14.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.14.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.15. Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States)
        • 6.4.15.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.15.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.15.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.15.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Protective Cultures Sale, by Type, Application, Composition, Form, Microorganism and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Protective Cultures (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Protective Cultures by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Pure Culture
        • 7.2.1.2. Mixed Culture
      • 7.2.2. Global Protective Cultures by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Dairy Based Products
        • 7.2.2.2. Meat & poultry Products
        • 7.2.2.3. Seafood
        • 7.2.2.4. Bakery & Confectioneries
        • 7.2.2.5. RTE Food Products
        • 7.2.2.6. Beverages
      • 7.2.3. Global Protective Cultures by: Composition (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Single strain
        • 7.2.3.2. Multi-strain
      • 7.2.4. Global Protective Cultures by: Form (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Frozen
        • 7.2.4.2. Freeze-dried
      • 7.2.5. Global Protective Cultures Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Protective Cultures (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Protective Cultures by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Protective Cultures: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Protective Cultures Pure Culture , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Protective Cultures Mixed Culture , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Protective Cultures: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Protective Cultures Dairy Based Products , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Protective Cultures Meat & poultry Products , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Protective Cultures Seafood , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Protective Cultures Bakery & Confectioneries , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Protective Cultures RTE Food Products , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Protective Cultures Beverages , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Protective Cultures: by Composition(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Protective Cultures Single strain , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Protective Cultures Multi-strain , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Protective Cultures: by Form(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Protective Cultures Frozen , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Protective Cultures Freeze-dried , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. South America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. South America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. South America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. South America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. South America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. China Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. China Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. China Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. China Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. China Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Japan Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Japan Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Japan Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Japan Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Japan Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. India Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. India Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. India Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. India Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. India Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Australia Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Australia Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Australia Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Australia Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Australia Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Europe Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Europe Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Europe Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Europe Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Europe Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Europe Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Germany Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Germany Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. Germany Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. Germany Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Germany Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. France Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. France Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. France Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. France Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. France Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Italy Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Italy Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Italy Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Italy Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. Italy Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. MEA Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. MEA Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. MEA Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. MEA Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. MEA Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. MEA Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Africa Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Africa Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Africa Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Africa Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Africa Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 131. North America Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 132. North America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 133. North America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 134. North America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 135. North America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 136. North America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 137. United States Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 138. United States Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 139. United States Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 140. United States Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 141. United States Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 142. Canada Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 143. Canada Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 144. Canada Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 145. Canada Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 146. Canada Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 147. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 148. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 149. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 150. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 151. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 152. Protective Cultures: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 153. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 154. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 155. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 156. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 157. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 158. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 159. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 160. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 161. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 162. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 163. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 164. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 165. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 166. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 167. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 168. Protective Cultures: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 169. Protective Cultures Pure Culture , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Protective Cultures Mixed Culture , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Protective Cultures: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 172. Protective Cultures Dairy Based Products , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Protective Cultures Meat & poultry Products , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Protective Cultures Seafood , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Protective Cultures Bakery & Confectioneries , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Protective Cultures RTE Food Products , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Protective Cultures Beverages , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Protective Cultures: by Composition(USD Million)
  • Table 179. Protective Cultures Single strain , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Protective Cultures Multi-strain , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Protective Cultures: by Form(USD Million)
  • Table 182. Protective Cultures Frozen , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Protective Cultures Freeze-dried , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. South America Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. South America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. South America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. South America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. South America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. South America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Brazil Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Argentina Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Rest of South America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. China Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. China Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. China Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. China Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. China Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Japan Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Japan Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Japan Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Japan Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Japan Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. India Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. India Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. India Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. India Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. India Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. South Korea Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. Taiwan Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. Australia Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. Australia Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. Australia Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. Australia Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. Australia Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Rest of Asia-Pacific Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Europe Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Europe Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Europe Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Europe Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. Europe Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. Europe Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. Germany Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. Germany Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. Germany Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. Germany Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. Germany Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. France Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. France Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. France Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. France Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. France Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Italy Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Italy Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Italy Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Italy Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Italy Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 269. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 270. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 271. United Kingdom Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 272. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 273. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 274. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 275. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 276. Netherlands Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 277. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 278. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 279. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 280. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 281. Rest of Europe Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 282. MEA Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 283. MEA Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 284. MEA Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 285. MEA Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 286. MEA Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 287. MEA Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 288. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 289. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 290. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 291. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 292. Middle East Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 293. Africa Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 294. Africa Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 295. Africa Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 296. Africa Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 297. Africa Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 298. North America Protective Cultures, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 299. North America Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 300. North America Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 301. North America Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 302. North America Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 303. North America Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 304. United States Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 305. United States Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 306. United States Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 307. United States Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 308. United States Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 309. Canada Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 310. Canada Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 311. Canada Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 312. Canada Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 313. Canada Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 314. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 315. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 316. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 317. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 318. Mexico Protective Cultures, by Microorganism USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 319. Protective Cultures: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 320. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 321. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 322. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Protective Cultures: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Protective Cultures: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Protective Cultures: by Composition USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Protective Cultures: by Form USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Protective Cultures: by Type USD/Units (2015-2020)
  • Figure 14. Global Protective Cultures share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Protective Cultures share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Protective Cultures share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. Chr. Hansen (Denmark) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Chr. Hansen (Denmark) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Kerry Group(Ireland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Kerry Group(Ireland) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Frutarom(Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Frutarom(Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. DSM (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. DSM (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Microtec Gmbh (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Microtec Gmbh (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Angel Yeast(China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Angel Yeast(China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Biovitec(France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Biovitec(France) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Lesaffre(France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. Lesaffre(France) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 40. Dohler(Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. Dohler(Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 42. CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 43. CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 44. Natren(United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 45. Natren(United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 46. Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 47. Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 48. Global Protective Cultures: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 49. Global Protective Cultures: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 50. Global Protective Cultures: by Composition USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 51. Global Protective Cultures: by Form USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 52. South America Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 53. Asia Pacific Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 54. Europe Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 55. MEA Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 56. North America Protective Cultures Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 57. Global Protective Cultures: by Type USD/Units (2021-2026)
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Chr. Hansen (Denmark)
  • Kerry Group(Ireland)
  • Frutarom(Israel)
  • Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain)
  • D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand)
  • DSM (Netherlands)
  • Microtec Gmbh (Germany)
  • Angel Yeast(China)
  • Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom)
  • Biovitec(France)
  • Lesaffre(France)
  • Dohler(Germany)
  • CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands)
  • Natren(United States)
  • Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Meat Cracks Technology GmbH (Germany) , Dalton Biotechnologies (Italy) , Aristomenis D. Phikas & Co SA. (Greece)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Feb 2022 244 Pages 77 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The standard version of the report profiles players such as Chr. Hansen (Denmark), Kerry Group(Ireland), Frutarom(Israel), Proquiga Biotech, S.A(Spain), D.M.Dunningham (New Zealand), DSM (Netherlands), Microtec Gmbh (Germany), Angel Yeast(China), Biocatalysts Limited (United Kingdom), Biovitec(France), Lesaffre(France), Dohler(Germany), CSK Food Enrichment(Netherlands), Natren(United States) and Wyeast Laboratories Inc.(United States) etc.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
Analysts at AMA estimates Protective Cultures Market to reach USD Million by 2026.

Know More About Global Protective Cultures Report?