Global Surgical Waste Management research

Surgical Waste Management Comprehensive Study by Type (Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management, Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management, Pathological Waste Management, Others), Application (Hospitals, Clinics, Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)), Treatment (Incineration, Autoclaving, Chemical Disinfection, Others), Waste (Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others), Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food)) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2030

Surgical Waste Management Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2024-2030 | CAGR: 11.9%  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
Surgical waste management deals with disposing of the medical wastes which are generated in the treatment or immunization during the surgery of human being or animals or in any kind of research in the hospital. Surgical waste management uses various techniques to reduce the effect of waste collected and its possible risk on staff or patients staying in the hospital. The incineration method is the widely used technique of surgical waste management which is the most effective method, it is used to treat about 90% of surgical wastes in the hospitals. According to AMA Research, the market for Surgical Waste Management is expected to register a CAGR of 11.9% during the forecast period to 2030. This growth is primarily driven by The growing need for safety of employees of the hospitals and reducing its possible adverse effects. It will help reduce sharp injury potential, resulting in the reduction of cost of direct and indirect treatment. It will reduce the risk of exposure to the harmful bloodborne pathogens and any other hospital-acquired infections. This will not only minimize environmental waste but also increase the safety of staff.

AttributesDetails
Study Period2018-2030
Base Year2023
Forecast Period2024-2030
Volume UnitN
Value UnitUSD (Million)
Customization ScopeAvail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility


The Health Care Services sector in the region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Players, such as Stericycle (United States), Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States), Veolia Environnement S.A (France), Cleanaway Daniels (Australia), Clean Harbors (United States), Republic Services, Inc. (United States), Envac Group (Sweden), Serres Oy (Finland), United Medical Waste Management (United States) and AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium), etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Key Developments in the Market:
In August 2020, Stericycle partnered with the World Health Organization to develop a global medical waste management program.
In July 2020, Veolia and Suez partnered with the European Commission to develop a circular economy for medical waste.Key players are adopting numerous strategies to gain market attention and to increase their market share, this strategy can be listed as increasing product portfolio, making partnerships to adopt certain technologies, and acquiring small players to finish the competition in the future. As well as investing money in the R&D sector to make technical upgrades to the product.

Regulatory Insights:
"National legislation constitutes a basis that must be drawn on to improve waste treatment practices in a country. Many countries are currently drawing up national medical waste management plans. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) has been financing a project in collaboration with the WHO in this context since 2006, the aim is to help 72 countries adopt a policy, strategy, and plan for managing the wastes generated in health-care activities."

Influencing Trend:
Increasing Use of Incineration Technology for Waste Treatment Because of its Effectiveness and The Advent of New Surgical Waste Treatment Methods

Market Growth Drivers:
The growing need for safety of employees of the hospitals and reducing its possible adverse effects. It will help reduce sharp injury potential, resulting in the reduction of cost of direct and indirect treatment. It will reduce the risk of exposure to the harmful bloodborne pathogens and any other hospital-acquired infections. This will not only minimize environmental waste but also increase the safety of staff

Challenges:
Surgical Waste Management Might be a Costly Process and Adherence of Regulatory Standards on Surgical Waste Management

Restraints:
Risk of Fire and Explosion Due to Surgical Waste Management

Opportunities:
Emerging Advanced Technologies in Surgical Waste Management will Boost the Market and Stringent Regulatory Guidelines Regarding the Surgical Waste Management

AMA Research follows a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mainly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcases the spontaneously changing Players landscape impacting the market's growth. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyze the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Data Sources of Surgical Waste Management Market Study

Primary Collection: InMail, LinkedIn Groups, Survey Monkey, Google, and Other professional Forums are some of the mediums utilized to gather primary data through key industry participants and appointees, subject-matter experts, C-level executives of Surgical Waste Management Industry, among others including independent industry consultants, experts, to obtain and verify critical qualitative commentary and opinion and quantitative statistics, to assess future market prospects.

The primary interviews and data collected as per the below protocols:
• By Designation: C-Level, D-Level, Others
• By Company Type: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3

Secondary Data Sources such as Annual reports, Press releases, Analyst meetings, Conference calls, Investor presentations, Management statements, and SEC filings of Surgical Waste Management players along with Regulatory Sites, Association, World bank, etc were used as sources secondary set of data.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts but also includes significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Surgical Waste Management Study Sheds Light on
— The Surgical Waste Management Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analysts at AMA organize and took surveys of the Surgical Waste Management industry Players. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Surgical Waste Management industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, surveys, and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Players can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold the value they currently claim or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management
  • Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management
  • Pathological Waste Management
  • Others
By Application
  • Hospitals
  • Clinics
  • Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
By Treatment
  • Incineration
  • Autoclaving
  • Chemical Disinfection
  • Others

By Waste
  • Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others)
  • Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food)

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. The growing need for safety of employees of the hospitals and reducing its possible adverse effects. It will help reduce sharp injury potential, resulting in the reduction of cost of direct and indirect treatment. It will reduce the risk of exposure to the harmful bloodborne pathogens and any other hospital-acquired infections. This will not only minimize environmental waste but also increase the safety of staff
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Surgical Waste Management Might be a Costly Process
      • 3.3.2. Adherence of Regulatory Standards on Surgical Waste Management
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Use of Incineration Technology for Waste Treatment Because of its Effectiveness
      • 3.4.2. The Advent of New Surgical Waste Treatment Methods
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Surgical Waste Management, by Type, Application, Treatment, Waste and Region (value) (2018-2023)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Surgical Waste Management (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management
        • 5.2.1.2. Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management
        • 5.2.1.3. Pathological Waste Management
        • 5.2.1.4. Others
      • 5.2.2. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Hospitals
        • 5.2.2.2. Clinics
        • 5.2.2.3. Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
      • 5.2.3. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Treatment (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Incineration
        • 5.2.3.2. Autoclaving
        • 5.2.3.3. Chemical Disinfection
        • 5.2.3.4. Others
      • 5.2.4. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Waste (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others)
        • 5.2.4.2. Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food)
      • 5.2.5. Global Surgical Waste Management Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Surgical Waste Management: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2023)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Stericycle (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Veolia Environnement S.A (France)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Cleanaway Daniels (Australia)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Clean Harbors (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Republic Services, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Envac Group (Sweden)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Serres Oy (Finland)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. United Medical Waste Management (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Surgical Waste Management Sale, by Type, Application, Treatment, Waste and Region (value) (2025-2030)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Surgical Waste Management (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management
        • 7.2.1.2. Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management
        • 7.2.1.3. Pathological Waste Management
        • 7.2.1.4. Others
      • 7.2.2. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Hospitals
        • 7.2.2.2. Clinics
        • 7.2.2.3. Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
      • 7.2.3. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Treatment (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Incineration
        • 7.2.3.2. Autoclaving
        • 7.2.3.3. Chemical Disinfection
        • 7.2.3.4. Others
      • 7.2.4. Global Surgical Waste Management by: Waste (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others)
        • 7.2.4.2. Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food)
      • 7.2.5. Global Surgical Waste Management Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Surgical Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Surgical Waste Management Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 3. Surgical Waste Management Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 4. Surgical Waste Management Pathological Waste Management , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 5. Surgical Waste Management Others , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 6. Surgical Waste Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Surgical Waste Management Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 8. Surgical Waste Management Clinics , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 9. Surgical Waste Management Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 10. Surgical Waste Management: by Treatment(USD Million)
  • Table 11. Surgical Waste Management Incineration , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 12. Surgical Waste Management Autoclaving , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 13. Surgical Waste Management Chemical Disinfection , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 14. Surgical Waste Management Others , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 15. Surgical Waste Management: by Waste(USD Million)
  • Table 16. Surgical Waste Management Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others) , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 17. Surgical Waste Management Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food) , by Region USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 18. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 19. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 20. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 21. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 22. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 23. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 24. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 25. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 26. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 27. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 28. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 29. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 30. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 31. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 32. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 33. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 35. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 36. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 37. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 40. China Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 41. China Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 42. China Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 43. China Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 44. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 45. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 46. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 47. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 48. India Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 49. India Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 50. India Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 51. India Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 52. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 53. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 54. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 55. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 56. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 57. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 58. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 60. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 61. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 62. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 63. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 64. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 65. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 66. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 68. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 69. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 70. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 71. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 72. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 73. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 74. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 75. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 76. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 77. France Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 78. France Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 79. France Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 80. France Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 81. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 82. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 83. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 84. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 85. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 86. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 87. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 89. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 90. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 91. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 93. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 94. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 95. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 97. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 98. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 99. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 100. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 101. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 102. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 103. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 104. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 105. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 106. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 107. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 108. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 109. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 110. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 111. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 112. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 113. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 114. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 115. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 116. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 117. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 118. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 119. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 120. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 121. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 122. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 123. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 124. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 125. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 126. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Table 127. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 128. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 129. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Surgical Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 138. Surgical Waste Management Bio-hazardous Waste Disposal Management , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 139. Surgical Waste Management Non-Hazardous Pharmaceutical Waste Management , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 140. Surgical Waste Management Pathological Waste Management , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 141. Surgical Waste Management Others , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 142. Surgical Waste Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 143. Surgical Waste Management Hospitals , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 144. Surgical Waste Management Clinics , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 145. Surgical Waste Management Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 146. Surgical Waste Management: by Treatment(USD Million)
  • Table 147. Surgical Waste Management Incineration , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 148. Surgical Waste Management Autoclaving , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 149. Surgical Waste Management Chemical Disinfection , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 150. Surgical Waste Management Others , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 151. Surgical Waste Management: by Waste(USD Million)
  • Table 152. Surgical Waste Management Risk Waste (Infectious, Pathological, Chemical, Others) , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 153. Surgical Waste Management Non-risk Waste (Packaging, Aerosols, Food) , by Region USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 154. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 155. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 156. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 157. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 158. South America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 159. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 160. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 161. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 162. Brazil Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 163. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 164. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 165. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 166. Argentina Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 167. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 168. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 169. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 170. Rest of South America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 171. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 172. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 173. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 174. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 175. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 176. China Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 177. China Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 178. China Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 179. China Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 180. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 181. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 182. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 183. Japan Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 184. India Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 185. India Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 186. India Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 187. India Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 188. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 189. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 190. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 191. South Korea Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 192. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 193. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 194. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 195. Taiwan Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 196. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 197. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 198. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 199. Australia Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 200. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 201. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 202. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 203. Rest of Asia-Pacific Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 204. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 205. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 206. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 207. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 208. Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 209. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 210. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 211. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 212. Germany Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 213. France Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 214. France Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 215. France Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 216. France Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 217. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 218. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 219. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 220. Italy Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 221. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 222. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 223. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 224. United Kingdom Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 225. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 226. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 227. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 228. Netherlands Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 229. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 230. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 231. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 232. Rest of Europe Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 233. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 234. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 235. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 236. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 237. MEA Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 238. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 239. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 240. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 241. Middle East Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 242. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 243. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 244. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 245. Africa Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 246. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 247. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 248. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 249. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 250. North America Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 251. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 252. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 253. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 254. United States Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 255. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 256. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 257. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 258. Canada Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 259. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 260. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 261. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 262. Mexico Surgical Waste Management, by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Table 263. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 264. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 265. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 5. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Application USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 6. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Treatment USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 7. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Waste USD Million (2018-2023)
  • Figure 8. South America Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Surgical Waste Management share by Players 2023 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Surgical Waste Management share by Players (Top 3) 2023(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Surgical Waste Management share by Players (Top 5) 2023(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. Stericycle (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Stericycle (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 19. Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 21. Veolia Environnement S.A (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Veolia Environnement S.A (France) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 23. Cleanaway Daniels (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Cleanaway Daniels (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 25. Clean Harbors (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Clean Harbors (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 27. Republic Services, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Republic Services, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 29. Envac Group (Sweden) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Envac Group (Sweden) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 31. Serres Oy (Finland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Serres Oy (Finland) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 33. United Medical Waste Management (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. United Medical Waste Management (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 35. AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium) Revenue: by Geography 2023
  • Figure 37. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 38. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Application USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 39. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Treatment USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 40. Global Surgical Waste Management: by Waste USD Million (2025-2030)
  • Figure 41. South America Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Surgical Waste Management Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Stericycle (United States)
  • Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States)
  • Veolia Environnement S.A (France)
  • Cleanaway Daniels (Australia)
  • Clean Harbors (United States)
  • Republic Services, Inc. (United States)
  • Envac Group (Sweden)
  • Serres Oy (Finland)
  • United Medical Waste Management (United States)
  • AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Apr 2024 203 Pages 55 Tables Base Year: 2023 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Surgical Waste Management research Quantitative research analysis
Global Surgical Waste Management research Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2018-2023; Base year: 2023; Forecast period: 2024 to 2030
Companies that are profiled in Global Surgical Waste Management Market are Stericycle (United States), Sharps Compliance, Inc. (United States), Veolia Environnement S.A (France), Cleanaway Daniels (Australia), Clean Harbors (United States), Republic Services, Inc. (United States), Envac Group (Sweden), Serres Oy (Finland), United Medical Waste Management (United States) and AMB Ecosteryl (Belgium) etc.
Hospitals segment in Global market to hold robust market share owing to "The growing need for safety of employees of the hospitals and reducing its possible adverse effects. It will help reduce sharp injury potential, resulting in the reduction of cost of direct and indirect treatment. It will reduce the risk of exposure to the harmful bloodborne pathogens and any other hospital-acquired infections. This will not only minimize environmental waste but also increase the safety of staff".
AMA Research predicts that Global Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Surgical Waste Management market throughout the forecasted period.

Know More About Global Surgical Waste Management research Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Dengue Vaccines Comprehensive Study by Application (Prevention of dengue, Enhanced the immunity), End Users (Government organizations, Medical clinics, Non-profit Organization, Diagnostic centers), V...
$ 3650
Sample Preparation Comprehensive Study by Type (Sample preparation instruments, Consumables, Sample preparation kits, Accessories), Application (Pharmaceutical industries, Biotechnology, Diagnostic l...
$ 3750
Gout Therapeutics Comprehensive Study by Type (NSAIDs, Corticosteroids, Colchicine, Urate-Lowering Agents), Application (Hospitals, Clinics), Diseases Type (Acute Gout, Chronic Gout) Players and Regi...
$ 3500
Air Ambulance Services Comprehensive Study by Mission Profile (Inter Facility Transport, Scene Response, Others), Service Model (Community Based, Hospital Based, Hybrid), Aircraft Type (Fixed Wing ...
$ 3350
Health Information Systems Comprehensive Study by Application (Electronic Health Record, Real-Time Healthcare, Population Health Management, Transfer of Information), End Users (Hospitals, Pharmacy, ...
$ 3650
Energy Management Systems for Healthcare Comprehensive Study by Type (Inpatient, Outpatient), Application (Residential, Commercial, Public Buildings), Service (Monitoring & Control, Implementation & ...
$ 3650