Global Nuclear Waste Management Market
Global Nuclear Waste Management Market

Nuclear Waste Management Comprehensive Study by Type (Low-Level Waste, High-Level Waste, Intermediate-Level Waste), Application (Industrial, Utility), Reactor Type (Pressurized Water Reactor, Boiling Water Reactor, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor, Gas Cooled Reactor) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2024

Nuclear Waste Management Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2019- 2024 | CAGR: 16.8%  

Mar 2019 Edition 230 Pages 186 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Scope of the Study
Nuclear waste is also known as reactor waste. Nuclear waste is the material that nuclear fuel becomes after it is used in a reactor. There are three types of nuclear waste including low level waste, High-Level Waste and Intermediate-Level Waste. Increasing energy requirements as well as expanding dependency on Fossil Fuel will help to boost global nuclear waste management market. There are several types of reactors used for nuclear waste management such as Pressurized Water Reactor, Boiling Water Reactor, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor and Gas Cooled Reactor.

The market study is being classified by Type (Low-Level Waste, High-Level Waste and Intermediate-Level Waste), by Application (Industrial and Utility) and major geographies with country level break-up. According to AMA, the Global Nuclear Waste Management market is expected to see growth rate of 16.8%

Augean Plc (United Kingdom), BHI Energy (United States), Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (United States), Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (Sweden), US Ecology, Inc. (United States), Veolia Environmental Services (France), DMT (Germany), Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States) and North Wind Group (United States) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research are Stericycle, Inc. (United State), Bechtel Corporation (United States) and Pangea Resources (United States).

Research Analyst at AMA predicts that United States Manufacturers will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Nuclear Waste Management market throughout the predicted period.

Segment Analysis
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Nuclear Waste Management market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Nuclear Waste Management has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). North America region held largest market share in the year 2018. Europe on the other hand stood as second largest market due to the presence of key companies into the region and high technological advancement. If we see Market by Reactor Type, the sub-segment i.e. Pressurized Water Reactor will boost the Nuclear Waste Management market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Increasing Energy Requirements
  • Expanding Dependency on Fossil Fuel
  • Low Electricity Cost Will Encourage Economies to Develops More Nuclear Power Plants

Market Trend
  • High Installation of Pressurized Water Reactors
  • Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources

Restraints
  • High Cost of Nuclear Waste Management System

Opportunities
  • Rising Demand Due To Growing Environmental Concerns
  • Huge Demand Due To Regulations for Better Usage of Efficient Fuels

Challenges
  • Growing Risk Related With Transportation of Nuclear Waste


Market Leaders and their expansionary development strategies
On 16th January 2018, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has collaborated with the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA) to advance a variety of technologies including commercialization of Perma-Fix Medical, S.A.'s process to produce Technetium-99 (Tc-99m), the most widely used medical isotope in the world.



Key Target Audience
Nuclear Waste Management System Developers, Industry Association, Downstream Vendors, Government Regularity Bodies, Private and Government Research Organization and Others

Customization in the Report Available:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Low-Level Waste
  • High-Level Waste
  • Intermediate-Level Waste
By Application
  • Industrial
  • Utility
By Reactor Type
  • Pressurized Water Reactor
  • Boiling Water Reactor
  • Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
  • Gas Cooled Reactor

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing Energy Requirements
      • 3.2.2. Expanding Dependency on Fossil Fuel
      • 3.2.3. Low Electricity Cost Will Encourage Economies to Develops More Nuclear Power Plants
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Growing Risk Related With Transportation of Nuclear Waste
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. High Installation of Pressurized Water Reactors
      • 3.4.2. Growing Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Energy Derived From Alternative Sources
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Nuclear Waste Management, by Type, Application, Reactor Type and Region (value) (2013-2018)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Nuclear Waste Management (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Low-Level Waste
        • 5.2.1.2. High-Level Waste
        • 5.2.1.3. Intermediate-Level Waste
      • 5.2.2. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Industrial
        • 5.2.2.2. Utility
      • 5.2.3. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Reactor Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Pressurized Water Reactor
        • 5.2.3.2. Boiling Water Reactor
        • 5.2.3.3. Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
        • 5.2.3.4. Gas Cooled Reactor
      • 5.2.4. Global Nuclear Waste Management Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Nuclear Waste Management: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2018)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Augean Plc (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. BHI Energy (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (Sweden)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. US Ecology, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Veolia Environmental Services (France)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. DMT (Germany)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. North Wind Group (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Nuclear Waste Management Sale, by Type, Application, Reactor Type and Region (value) (2019-2024)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Nuclear Waste Management (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Low-Level Waste
        • 7.2.1.2. High-Level Waste
        • 7.2.1.3. Intermediate-Level Waste
      • 7.2.2. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Industrial
        • 7.2.2.2. Utility
      • 7.2.3. Global Nuclear Waste Management by: Reactor Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Pressurized Water Reactor
        • 7.2.3.2. Boiling Water Reactor
        • 7.2.3.3. Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor
        • 7.2.3.4. Gas Cooled Reactor
      • 7.2.4. Global Nuclear Waste Management Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Nuclear Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Nuclear Waste Management Low-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 3. Nuclear Waste Management High-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 4. Nuclear Waste Management Intermediate-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 5. Nuclear Waste Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 6. Nuclear Waste Management Industrial , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 7. Nuclear Waste Management Utility , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 8. Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor Type(USD Million)
  • Table 9. Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 10. Nuclear Waste Management Boiling Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 11. Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 12. Nuclear Waste Management Gas Cooled Reactor , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 13. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 14. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 15. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 16. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 17. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 18. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 19. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 20. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 21. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 22. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 23. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 30. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 31. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 32. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 33. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 34. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 35. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 36. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 37. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 38. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 39. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 40. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 41. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 42. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 45. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 46. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 47. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 48. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 51. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 52. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 53. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 54. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 55. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 56. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 57. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 58. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 59. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 60. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 61. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 62. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 63. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 64. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 67. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 70. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 73. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 74. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 75. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 76. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 77. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 78. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 79. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 80. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 81. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 82. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 83. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 84. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 85. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 86. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 87. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 88. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 89. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 90. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 91. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 92. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 93. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 94. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 95. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 96. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Nuclear Waste Management: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 106. Nuclear Waste Management Low-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 107. Nuclear Waste Management High-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 108. Nuclear Waste Management Intermediate-Level Waste , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 109. Nuclear Waste Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 110. Nuclear Waste Management Industrial , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 111. Nuclear Waste Management Utility , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 112. Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor Type(USD Million)
  • Table 113. Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 114. Nuclear Waste Management Boiling Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 115. Nuclear Waste Management Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 116. Nuclear Waste Management Gas Cooled Reactor , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 117. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 118. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 119. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 120. South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 121. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 122. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 123. Brazil Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 124. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 125. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 126. Argentina Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 127. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 128. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 129. Rest of South America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 130. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 131. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 132. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 133. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 134. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 135. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 136. China Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 137. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 138. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 139. Japan Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 140. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 141. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 142. India Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 143. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 144. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 145. South Korea Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 146. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 147. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 148. Taiwan Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 149. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 150. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 151. Australia Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 152. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 153. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 154. Rest of Asia-Pacific Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 155. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 156. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 157. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 158. Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 159. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 160. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 161. Germany Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 162. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 163. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 164. France Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 165. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 166. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 167. Italy Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 168. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 169. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 170. United Kingdom Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 171. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 172. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 173. Netherlands Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 174. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 175. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 176. Rest of Europe Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 177. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 178. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 179. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 180. MEA Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 181. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 182. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 183. Middle East Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 184. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 185. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 186. Africa Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 187. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 188. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 189. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 190. North America Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 191. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 192. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 193. United States Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 194. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 195. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 196. Canada Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 197. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 198. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 199. Mexico Nuclear Waste Management, by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 200. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 201. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 202. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 5. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 6. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 7. South America Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Nuclear Waste Management share by Players 2018 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Nuclear Waste Management share by Players (Top 3) 2018(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Nuclear Waste Management share by Players (Top 5) 2018(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Augean Plc (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Augean Plc (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 18. BHI Energy (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. BHI Energy (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 20. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 22. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (Sweden) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (Sweden) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 24. US Ecology, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. US Ecology, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 26. Veolia Environmental Services (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Veolia Environmental Services (France) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 28. DMT (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. DMT (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 30. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 32. North Wind Group (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. North Wind Group (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 34. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 35. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 36. Global Nuclear Waste Management: by Reactor Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 37. South America Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. Asia Pacific Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 39. Europe Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. MEA Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. North America Nuclear Waste Management Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • Augean Plc (United Kingdom)
  • BHI Energy (United States)
  • Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (United States)
  • Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (Sweden)
  • US Ecology, Inc. (United States)
  • Veolia Environmental Services (France)
  • DMT (Germany)
  • Waste Control Specialists, LLC. (United States)
  • North Wind Group (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Stericycle, Inc. (United State) , Bechtel Corporation (United States) , Pangea Resources (United States)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation