Global Academic Scheduling Software Market
Global Academic Scheduling Software Market

Academic Scheduling Software Comprehensive Study by Features (Customised reporting, Intuitive interface, Manageable workflow, Others), Platform (Android, Windows, IOS), End users (Schools, Colleges, Universities, Educational Institutions), Deployment (Cloud-Based, Web-Based), Pricing (Monthly, Annually, One-time license) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2025

Academic Scheduling Software Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2020- 2025  

Jun 2020 Edition 200 Pages 213 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Scope of the Study

Academic Scheduling software helps to automate the process of assigning courses, rooms, and students to instructors at educational institutions. By using Academic Scheduling software, the administrators can set up time slots for classes and create optimal schedule for each student which is based on needs and available resources. These types of tool make the process of scheduling courses faster and more efficient. Also, especially at large institutions which are tasked with creating schedules for thousands of students and staff.

The market study is being classified and major geographies with country level break-up.

EMS Software (United States), FamilyID (United States), Sapphire Software (United States), CollegeNET (United States), Drivers Ed Solutions (United States), Schilling Consulting (United States), Scholastico.com (Mexico), Applied Software Consultants (India), College Scheduler (United States) and Foradian Technologies (India) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are CyberMatrix Corporation (Canada), ISAMS (United Kingdom) and ASIMUT software ApS (United States).

The companies are now exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new developments in existing products and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are also exploring new geographies and industries through expansions and acquisitions so as to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Research Analyst at AMA predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Academic Scheduling Software market throughout the predicted period.

Segment Analysis
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Academic Scheduling Software market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Academic Scheduling Software has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Increasing Effectiveness and Efficiency is Fuelling the Market
  • Features Such as Customised Reporting, Initiative Interface

Market Trend
  • Increasing Popularity of Academic Scheduling Software among Collages

Restraints
  • High Costs Associated with the Installation and Development of Software

Opportunities
  • Increasing Investments by Education Sectors is Boosting the Market
  • Rising Need for Academic Scheduling Software

Challenges
  • Presence of Major as Well as Emerging Players are Increasing the Competition





Key Target Audience
Educational institutions, Government associations, Research organisations, software vendors and Others

Customization in the Report Available:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Features
  • Customised reporting
  • Intuitive interface
  • Manageable workflow
  • Others

By Platform
  • Android
  • Windows
  • IOS

By End users
  • Schools
  • Colleges
  • Universities
  • Educational Institutions

By Deployment
  • Cloud-Based
  • Web-Based

By Pricing
  • Monthly
  • Annually
  • One-time license

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing Effectiveness and Efficiency is Fuelling the Market
      • 3.2.2. Features Such as Customised Reporting, Initiative Interface
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Presence of Major as Well as Emerging Players are Increasing the Competition
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Popularity of Academic Scheduling Software among Collages
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Academic Scheduling Software, by Features , Platform, End users , Deployment , Pricing and Region (value) (2014-2019)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Academic Scheduling Software (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Academic Scheduling Software by: Platform (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Android
        • 5.2.1.2. Windows
        • 5.2.1.3. IOS
      • 5.2.2. Global Academic Scheduling Software Region
        • 5.2.2.1. South America
          • 5.2.2.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.2.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.2.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.2.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.2.2.1. China
          • 5.2.2.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.2.2.3. India
          • 5.2.2.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.2.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.2.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.2.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.2.3. Europe
          • 5.2.2.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.2.3.2. France
          • 5.2.2.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.2.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.2.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.2.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.2.4. MEA
          • 5.2.2.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.2.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.2.5. North America
          • 5.2.2.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.2.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.2.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Academic Scheduling Software: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2019)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. EMS Software (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. FamilyID (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Sapphire Software (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. CollegeNET (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Drivers Ed Solutions (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Schilling Consulting (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Scholastico.com (Mexico)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Applied Software Consultants (India)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. College Scheduler (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Foradian Technologies (India)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Academic Scheduling Software Sale, by Features , Platform, End users , Deployment , Pricing and Region (value) (2020-2025)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Academic Scheduling Software (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Academic Scheduling Software by: Platform (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Android
        • 7.2.1.2. Windows
        • 7.2.1.3. IOS
      • 7.2.2. Global Academic Scheduling Software Region
        • 7.2.2.1. South America
          • 7.2.2.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.2.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.2.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.2.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.2.2.1. China
          • 7.2.2.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.2.2.3. India
          • 7.2.2.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.2.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.2.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.2.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.2.3. Europe
          • 7.2.2.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.2.3.2. France
          • 7.2.2.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.2.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.2.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.2.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.2.4. MEA
          • 7.2.2.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.2.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.2.5. North America
          • 7.2.2.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.2.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.2.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Academic Scheduling Software: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Academic Scheduling Software Android , by Region USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 3. Academic Scheduling Software Windows , by Region USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 4. Academic Scheduling Software IOS , by Region USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 5. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 6. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 7. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 8. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 9. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 10. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 11. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 12. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 13. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 14. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 15. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 16. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 17. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 18. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 19. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 20. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 21. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 22. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 23. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 31. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 32. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 33. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 34. China Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 35. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 36. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 37. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 38. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 39. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 40. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 41. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 42. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 43. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 44. India Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 45. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 46. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 47. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 48. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 49. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 50. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 51. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 52. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 53. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 54. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 55. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 56. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 57. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 58. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 59. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 60. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 61. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 62. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 63. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 64. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 65. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 66. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 67. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 68. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 69. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 70. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 71. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 72. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 73. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 74. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 75. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 76. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 77. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 78. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 79. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 80. France Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 81. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 82. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 83. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 84. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 85. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 86. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 87. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 91. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 92. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 95. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 96. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 97. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 99. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 100. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 101. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 102. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 103. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 104. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 105. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 106. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 107. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 108. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 109. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 110. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 111. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 112. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 113. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 114. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 115. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 116. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 117. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 118. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 119. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 120. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 121. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 122. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 123. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 124. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 125. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 126. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 127. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 128. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 129. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 130. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 131. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 132. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 133. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 134. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 135. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 136. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 137. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 138. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 139. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Table 140. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 141. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 142. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 143. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 144. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 145. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 146. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 147. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 148. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 149. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 150. Academic Scheduling Software: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 151. Academic Scheduling Software Android , by Region USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 152. Academic Scheduling Software Windows , by Region USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 153. Academic Scheduling Software IOS , by Region USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 154. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 155. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 156. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 157. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 158. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 159. South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 160. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 161. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 162. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 163. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 164. Brazil Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 165. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 166. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 167. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 168. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 169. Argentina Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 170. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 171. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 172. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 173. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 174. Rest of South America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 175. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 176. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 177. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 178. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 179. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 180. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 181. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 182. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 183. China Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 184. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 185. China Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 186. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 187. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 188. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 189. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 190. Japan Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 191. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 192. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 193. India Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 194. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 195. India Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 196. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 197. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 198. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 199. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 200. South Korea Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 201. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 202. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 203. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 204. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 205. Taiwan Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 206. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 207. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 208. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 209. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 210. Australia Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 211. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 212. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 213. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 214. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 215. Rest of Asia-Pacific Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 216. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 217. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 218. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 219. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 220. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 221. Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 222. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 223. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 224. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 225. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 226. Germany Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 227. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 228. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 229. France Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 230. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 231. France Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 232. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 233. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 234. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 235. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 236. Italy Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 237. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 238. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 239. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 240. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 241. United Kingdom Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 242. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 243. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 244. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 245. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 246. Netherlands Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 247. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 248. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 249. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 250. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 251. Rest of Europe Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 252. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 253. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 254. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 255. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 256. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 257. MEA Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 258. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 259. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 260. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 261. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 262. Middle East Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 263. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 264. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 265. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 266. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 267. Africa Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 268. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Country USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 269. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 270. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 271. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 272. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 273. North America Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 274. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 275. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 276. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 277. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 278. United States Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 279. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 280. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 281. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 282. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 283. Canada Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 284. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Features USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 285. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 286. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by End users USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 287. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Deployment USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 288. Mexico Academic Scheduling Software, by Pricing USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Table 289. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 290. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 291. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Academic Scheduling Software: by Platform USD Million (2014-2019)
  • Figure 5. South America Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 6. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 7. Europe Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. MEA Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. North America Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Global Academic Scheduling Software share by Players 2019 (%)
  • Figure 11. Global Academic Scheduling Software share by Players (Top 3) 2019(%)
  • Figure 12. Global Academic Scheduling Software share by Players (Top 5) 2019(%)
  • Figure 13. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 14. EMS Software (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 15. EMS Software (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 16. FamilyID (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. FamilyID (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 18. Sapphire Software (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Sapphire Software (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 20. CollegeNET (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. CollegeNET (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 22. Drivers Ed Solutions (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Drivers Ed Solutions (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 24. Schilling Consulting (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Schilling Consulting (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 26. Scholastico.com (Mexico) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Scholastico.com (Mexico) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 28. Applied Software Consultants (India) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Applied Software Consultants (India) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 30. College Scheduler (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. College Scheduler (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 32. Foradian Technologies (India) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Foradian Technologies (India) Revenue: by Geography 2019
  • Figure 34. Global Academic Scheduling Software: by Platform USD Million (2020-2025)
  • Figure 35. South America Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 36. Asia Pacific Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 37. Europe Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. MEA Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 39. North America Academic Scheduling Software Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • EMS Software (United States)
  • FamilyID (United States)
  • Sapphire Software (United States)
  • CollegeNET (United States)
  • Drivers Ed Solutions (United States)
  • Schilling Consulting (United States)
  • Scholastico.com (Mexico)
  • Applied Software Consultants (India)
  • College Scheduler (United States)
  • Foradian Technologies (India)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
CyberMatrix Corporation (Canada) , ISAMS (United Kingdom) , ASIMUT software ApS (United States)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation