Global Docker Monitoring
Global Docker Monitoring

Docker Monitoring Comprehensive Study by Type (Solution, Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support)), Application (IT and Telecom, Ecommerce and Retail, Media and Entertainment, Travel and Hospitality, Healthcare and Life Sciences, Others), Organization (Large Enterprise, Small and Medium Enterprise), Deployment (On-Premises, Cloud-Based) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2024

Docker Monitoring Market Segmented into XX Submarkets. | Forecast Years: 2019- 2024  

Dec 2019 Edition 248 Pages 210 Tables & Figures
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Tables & Figures
  • Companies Mentioned
Scope of the Study

Docker is a flexible, scalable set of the platform as service products that use OS-level virtualization to deliver software in packages called containers. It is an open-source project for building, packaging and distributing containerized applications. There is a need for constant container monitoring. Docker container monitoring tools are essential for maintaining performance efficiency and detecting performance problems. It ensures increased health, performance and availability of docker containers.

The market study is being classified by Type (Solution and Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support)), by Application (IT and Telecom, Ecommerce and Retail, Media and Entertainment, Travel and Hospitality, Healthcare and Life Sciences and Others) and major geographies with country level break-up.

AppDynamics (United States), ITRS Group Ltd (United Kingdom), New Relic (United States), Broadcom (United States), Dynatrace (United States), Microsoft (United States), Datadog (United States), Sysdig (United States), Splunk (United States), BMC Software (United States) and IBM (United States) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are Riverbed Technology (United States), Oracle (United States), ScienceLogic (United States) and SolarWinds (United States).

Research Analyst at AMA predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Docker Monitoring market throughout the predicted period.

Segment Analysis
AdvanceMarketAnalytics has segmented the market of Global Docker Monitoring market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Docker Monitoring has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Market Drivers
  • Increased Need for Docker Monitoring To Avoid System Outages
  • Demand for Application Development and Testing

Market Trend
  • The Business Impact of Docker Container Performance Is Largely Unmeasured Today
  • Rising Docker Popularity

Restraints
  • Complexities in Docker Monitoring Security

Opportunities
  • Rise in the Trend of Multi-Cloud among Enterprise
  • Increasing Adoption of Docker Monitoring Solutions

Challenges
  • Lack of Skilled Professionals
  • Less Awareness among People





Key Target Audience
Docker Monitoring Providers, Research Professionals, Emerging Companies, Government Body & Associations and End-user

Customization in the Report Available:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.
Data related to EXIM [Export- Import], production & consumption by country or regional level break-up can be provided based on client request**
** Confirmation on availability of data would be informed prior purchase
Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered
By Type
  • Solution
  • Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support)
By Application
  • IT and Telecom
  • Ecommerce and Retail
  • Media and Entertainment
  • Travel and Hospitality
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • Others
By Organization
  • Large Enterprise
  • Small and Medium Enterprise

By Deployment
  • On-Premises
  • Cloud-Based

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increased Need for Docker Monitoring To Avoid System Outages
      • 3.2.2. Demand for Application Development and Testing
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Skilled Professionals
      • 3.3.2. Less Awareness among People
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. The Business Impact of Docker Container Performance Is Largely Unmeasured Today
      • 3.4.2. Rising Docker Popularity
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Docker Monitoring, by Type, Application, Organization, Deployment and Region (value) (2013-2018)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Docker Monitoring (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Docker Monitoring by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Solution
        • 5.2.1.2. Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support)
      • 5.2.2. Global Docker Monitoring by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. IT and Telecom
        • 5.2.2.2. Ecommerce and Retail
        • 5.2.2.3. Media and Entertainment
        • 5.2.2.4. Travel and Hospitality
        • 5.2.2.5. Healthcare and Life Sciences
        • 5.2.2.6. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Docker Monitoring by: Organization (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Large Enterprise
        • 5.2.3.2. Small and Medium Enterprise
      • 5.2.4. Global Docker Monitoring by: Deployment (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. On-Premises
        • 5.2.4.2. Cloud-Based
      • 5.2.5. Global Docker Monitoring Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Docker Monitoring: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2018)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. AppDynamics (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. ITRS Group Ltd (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. New Relic (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Broadcom (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Dynatrace (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Microsoft (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Datadog (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Sysdig (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Splunk (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. BMC Software (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. IBM (United States)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Docker Monitoring Sale, by Type, Application, Organization, Deployment and Region (value) (2019-2024)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Docker Monitoring (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Docker Monitoring by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Solution
        • 7.2.1.2. Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support)
      • 7.2.2. Global Docker Monitoring by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. IT and Telecom
        • 7.2.2.2. Ecommerce and Retail
        • 7.2.2.3. Media and Entertainment
        • 7.2.2.4. Travel and Hospitality
        • 7.2.2.5. Healthcare and Life Sciences
        • 7.2.2.6. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Docker Monitoring by: Organization (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Large Enterprise
        • 7.2.3.2. Small and Medium Enterprise
      • 7.2.4. Global Docker Monitoring by: Deployment (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. On-Premises
        • 7.2.4.2. Cloud-Based
      • 7.2.5. Global Docker Monitoring Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Docker Monitoring: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Docker Monitoring Solution , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 3. Docker Monitoring Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support) , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 4. Docker Monitoring: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Docker Monitoring IT and Telecom , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 6. Docker Monitoring Ecommerce and Retail , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 7. Docker Monitoring Media and Entertainment , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 8. Docker Monitoring Travel and Hospitality , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 9. Docker Monitoring Healthcare and Life Sciences , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 10. Docker Monitoring Others , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 11. Docker Monitoring: by Organization(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Docker Monitoring Large Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 13. Docker Monitoring Small and Medium Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 14. Docker Monitoring: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Docker Monitoring On-Premises , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 16. Docker Monitoring Cloud-Based , by Region USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 17. South America Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 18. South America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 19. South America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 20. South America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 21. South America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 22. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 23. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 24. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 25. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 26. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 27. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 28. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 29. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 30. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 31. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 32. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 33. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 34. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 35. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 36. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 37. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 39. China Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 40. China Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 41. China Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 42. China Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 43. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 44. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 45. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 46. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 47. India Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 48. India Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 49. India Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 50. India Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 51. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 52. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 53. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 54. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 55. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 56. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 57. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 58. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 59. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 60. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 61. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 62. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 63. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 64. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 65. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 66. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 67. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 68. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 69. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 70. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 71. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 72. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 73. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 74. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 75. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 76. France Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 77. France Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 78. France Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 79. France Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 80. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 81. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 82. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 83. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 84. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 85. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 86. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 87. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 88. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 89. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 90. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 91. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 92. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 93. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 94. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 95. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 96. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 97. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 98. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 99. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 100. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 101. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 102. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 103. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 104. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 105. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 106. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 107. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 108. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 109. North America Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 110. North America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 111. North America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 112. North America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 113. North America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 114. United States Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 115. United States Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 116. United States Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 117. United States Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 118. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 119. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 120. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 121. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 122. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 123. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 124. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 125. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Table 126. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 127. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 128. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 129. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Docker Monitoring: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 138. Docker Monitoring Solution , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 139. Docker Monitoring Services (Integration and Implementation, Consulting, Training and Support) , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 140. Docker Monitoring: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 141. Docker Monitoring IT and Telecom , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 142. Docker Monitoring Ecommerce and Retail , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 143. Docker Monitoring Media and Entertainment , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 144. Docker Monitoring Travel and Hospitality , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 145. Docker Monitoring Healthcare and Life Sciences , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 146. Docker Monitoring Others , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 147. Docker Monitoring: by Organization(USD Million)
  • Table 148. Docker Monitoring Large Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 149. Docker Monitoring Small and Medium Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 150. Docker Monitoring: by Deployment(USD Million)
  • Table 151. Docker Monitoring On-Premises , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 152. Docker Monitoring Cloud-Based , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 153. South America Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 154. South America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 155. South America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 156. South America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 157. South America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 158. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 159. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 160. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 161. Brazil Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 162. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 163. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 164. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 165. Argentina Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 166. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 167. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 168. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 169. Rest of South America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 170. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 171. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 172. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 173. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 174. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 175. China Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 176. China Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 177. China Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 178. China Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 179. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 180. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 181. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 182. Japan Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 183. India Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 184. India Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 185. India Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 186. India Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 187. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 188. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 189. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 190. South Korea Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 191. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 192. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 193. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 194. Taiwan Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 195. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 196. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 197. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 198. Australia Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 199. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 200. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 201. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 202. Rest of Asia-Pacific Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 203. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 204. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 205. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 206. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 207. Europe Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 208. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 209. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 210. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 211. Germany Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 212. France Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 213. France Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 214. France Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 215. France Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 216. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 217. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 218. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 219. Italy Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 220. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 221. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 222. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 223. United Kingdom Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 224. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 225. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 226. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 227. Netherlands Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 228. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 229. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 230. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 231. Rest of Europe Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 232. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 233. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 234. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 235. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 236. MEA Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 237. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 238. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 239. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 240. Middle East Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 241. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 242. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 243. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 244. Africa Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 245. North America Docker Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 246. North America Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 247. North America Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 248. North America Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 249. North America Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 250. United States Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 251. United States Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 252. United States Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 253. United States Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 254. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 255. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 256. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 257. Canada Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 258. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 259. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 260. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 261. Mexico Docker Monitoring, by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 262. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 263. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 264. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Docker Monitoring: by Type USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 5. Global Docker Monitoring: by Application USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 6. Global Docker Monitoring: by Organization USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 7. Global Docker Monitoring: by Deployment USD Million (2013-2018)
  • Figure 8. South America Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Docker Monitoring share by Players 2018 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Docker Monitoring share by Players (Top 3) 2018(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Docker Monitoring share by Players (Top 5) 2018(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. AppDynamics (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. AppDynamics (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 19. ITRS Group Ltd (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. ITRS Group Ltd (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 21. New Relic (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. New Relic (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 23. Broadcom (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Broadcom (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 25. Dynatrace (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Dynatrace (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 27. Microsoft (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Microsoft (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 29. Datadog (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Datadog (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 31. Sysdig (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Sysdig (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 33. Splunk (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Splunk (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 35. BMC Software (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. BMC Software (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 37. IBM (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 38. IBM (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2018
  • Figure 39. Global Docker Monitoring: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 40. Global Docker Monitoring: by Application USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 41. Global Docker Monitoring: by Organization USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 42. Global Docker Monitoring: by Deployment USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 43. South America Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. Europe Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. MEA Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. North America Docker Monitoring Share (%), by Country
Some of the key companies/manufacturers profiled in the report
  • AppDynamics (United States)
  • ITRS Group Ltd (United Kingdom)
  • New Relic (United States)
  • Broadcom (United States)
  • Dynatrace (United States)
  • Microsoft (United States)
  • Datadog (United States)
  • Sysdig (United States)
  • Splunk (United States)
  • BMC Software (United States)
  • IBM (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Riverbed Technology (United States) , Oracle (United States) , ScienceLogic (United States) , SolarWinds (United States)
Select License Type
Sample Report Enquiry Before Buy Request Discount

Speak with Analyst

Want to find out more about this report?

Get Free Consultation